StopPATH WV
  • News
  • StopPATH WV Blog
  • FAQ
  • Events
  • Fundraisers
  • Make a Donation
  • Landowner Resources
  • About PATH
  • Get Involved
  • Commercials
  • Links
  • About Us
  • Contact

AEP Earnings Call a Block and Tackle Bunch of Bull

1/29/2014

1 Comment

 
Ever listened to an investor owned utility's earnings call?  They're an acquired taste, because your first one sounds like complete and utter gibberish.  Are these people speaking English?  Is there some fancy 1% business speak language that they didn't teach you in school?  Nope.  I think company management just plain ol' makes crap up to keep the investment analysts guessing.

Case in point -- Nick Akins and his "block and tackle spending." 
And then, when you look at the other capital that we're spending, it's block and tackle spending that typically is recovered from a regulated standpoint.
Blink.  Blink.  What?  Just for shits and giggles I plugged "block and tackle spending" into google.  I got a wikipedia description of block and tackle that describes it thus:  "...a system of two or more pulleys with a rope or cable threaded between them, usually used to lift or pull heavy loads," and a whole bunch of boating websites.  So, Nick is going to rig up some contraption that spends money using a system of pulleys and rope?  Sounds complicated.  I guess that's why they pay him the big bucks!

Anyhow... once you realize that the emperor has no clothes and that these corporate elitists are really not speaking in some special language, like pig latin, that your plebeian self doesn't understand, earnings calls are quite entertaining.  AEP's 4Q 2013 call on Monday was no exception.

AEP's CFO finally gets around to admitting that energy efficiency has flattened out residential demand growth and it's not expected to recover.
Residential sales, shown in the upper left quadrant, were up 0.9% for the quarter, which brings the annual sales flat to 2012. We continue to see modest customer growth in our Western service areas, while our East customer accounts were essentially flat. Average usage per customer has been impacted by home energy efficiency programs. For these reasons, we are expecting normalized residential sales to be down nearly 1% in 2014.
Too bad he's arriving late for the party.  How much do they pay this guy to make these brilliant conclusions?

AEP also got some apt questions about its planned "transmission spend," such as what it's going to take to make AEP fall out of love with transmission as an investment vehicle... oh, say, maybe as a little section 206 complaint or two:
Michael J. Lapides - Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Research Division
Yes, 2 questions unrelated. First, on the transmission side. We've seen in the MISO and in New England dockets where interveners are seeking lower transmission base ROEs. If same things happens in some of -- whether it's the Southwest Power Pool, whether it's in PJM, how -- what do you think that tipping point is where we change or, I don't know, you're incentive or your desire to be a sizable investor in transmission in the U.S.?

Nicholas K. Akins - Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President, Member of Executive Committee and Member of Policy Committee
I think, as long as transmission is, at a premium or equal to the state rates, we're in good shape. And I think, clearly, there is an incentive being placed on building transmission. We're happy with that. And if -- really, once again, the FERC needs to send some messages here that from a policy perspective that we want to continue building transmission in this country. And as long as that premium is at or above the state rates, then we're in good shape.

Brian X. Tierney - Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President
FERC was clearly, Michael, looking to attract a capital into this space. And what they've done with their ROEs has done exactly what FERC wanted to happen. So as long as they, as Nick was saying, as long as they continue to send a signal that they want increased investment in this area, we'll respond to that signal.

Nicholas K. Akins - Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President, Member of Executive Committee and Member of Policy Committee
Okay, I think it's good -- I think, it continues to be part and parcel to the overall grid expansion that's going on in the resilience of the grid. And there's going to continue to be spin regardless. The question is, do you really want to satisfy that precursor of transmission being build out to respond to the generation retirements and so forth to optimize the grid so that you can do that as a prerequisite and then focus on the rest of the underlying system. That's what key. I think you got to get through this transitional process we're at in this industry. So transmission needs to be incentivized in that regard because that will provide the greatest benefit in terms of resiliency of the grid, but also in terms of the optimization of the resources that are attached to the grid.
Blah, blah, blah, grid expansion, transmission build out, blah, blah, what could go wrong?

What about fierce, organized opposition to AEP's transmission plans?  The people have spoken and their action has seriously complicated or delayed many of AEP's transmission plans, in the past, currently, and in the future.  In fact, opposition is getting more organized and more knowledgeable.  And we're not going away.

AEP needs a new business plan.  Transmission is not the carefree investment vehicle Nick thinks it is...
1 Comment

Ireland Struggles With Misguided Energy Policy & Big Wind Greed

1/27/2014

0 Comments

 
Well, deja vu, folks!

It seems that the Midwest shares a common struggle with the people of Ireland.

A recent editorial in Ireland's Independent reads like something penned in the central U.S.:
The expected growth in electricity demand has not materialised. There is now a wide and growing margin of generation capacity over demand. A new gas-fired plant was commissioned last year and another one is due to come on stream towards the end of 2014. The construction of new wind-farms continues apace. While some of the older stations are coming to the end of their useful lives, none are on their last legs. If Ireland was left to its own devices, there would be no urgency about adding more generation capacity for many years to come.

*snip*

Plans by Eirgrid to upgrade the high voltage transmission network, and in particular to build three major lines in the southeast, the west and a new North-South line, reflect both the ongoing need to renew and strengthen the network but also the perceived requirement to accommodate additional wind-power units. If the Government's wind targets are excessively ambitious, some of the grid projects might not be needed. There is also a push from wind-energy companies, including State companies, to build more capacity designed for exporting power to the UK. If these plans go ahead, there would be yet more high voltage lines, on top of Eirgrid's proposals, from the midlands to the east coast, as well as further undersea interconnection to Britain.

Energy infrastructure is both expensive and controversial. *snip* Plans for new transmission lines, extra wind-farms and onshore gas exploration are meeting widespread resistance around the country and promise to dominate the local and European Parliament elections in May.

If energy infrastructure projects make economic sense, the political system must arbitrate the health, safety and environmental concerns that will inevitably, and quite properly, be raised. It is sometimes tempting to regard the objectors as locally oriented nimbies seeking to blackmail politicians who are pursuing necessary national priorities. Indeed this is hinted at in the government line on pylons and wind-farms, which takes it as read that the various projects are necessary to meet the requirements of development. But if the economic justification for the projects is flimsy, the balance of the argument is altered. In Ireland it has not been demonstrated that the continuing push for ever-greater reliance on intermittent wind-generated electricity makes economic sense, nor is it clear that wind is the least-cost path to reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
BINGO!

So, it's not a need issue, it's a GREED issue, just like it is here in the U.S.
0 Comments

Wisconsin Ratepayers Ask States to Consider Non-Transmission Alternatives in Planning for Peak Load

1/27/2014

0 Comments

 
Rob Danielson of SOUL of Wisconsin, and Deb Severson of Citizens' Energy Task Force, are asking state regulators to join them in supporting financially and environmentally sustainable energy solutions.

In a recent editorial in The Wisconsin State Journal, the pair of ratepayer advocates is asking the Wisconsin Public Service Commission to make utilities accountable for the financial and community costs of building more transmission, and for using the term “reliability” so loosely that ratepayers are led to think these lines are about “keeping the lights on.”

Danielson and Severson contend that energy efficiency contributes to grid reliability by reducing stress on the grid. Efficiency is also the best way to save ratepayers’ money and reduce our carbon footprint. It has no negative impacts, other than reducing utility profits.

Utilities and state regulators need to acknowledge how cost-effective it is to shave peak-demand during those very limited hours in the summer or winter when demand spikes — and that this, too, increases grid reliability. Paying customers to turn off their air conditioners for 15 minutes, or an industrial customer to use back-up diesel, makes far more economic sense than spending billions to add wires to bring in rarely needed extra power. Energy spikes can also be addressed by adding local renewables, which have the added benefit of creating additional local, ongoing jobs.

There are many ways to address need without building new transmmission, and Danielson and Severson are asking for equal consideration of them. Consumers are demanding that ratepayer and community interests — not utility and Wall Street profits — drive our future transmission planning decisions.

0 Comments

Potomac Edison's Estimated Bills Are More Screwed Up Than Ever

1/27/2014

0 Comments

 
Yeah, I know, news flash, right?  But I was actually surprised to get my most recent estimated bill.  No, it wasn't because it took 10 long days to get here after it was issued.  And, no, it wasn't because it was all bulky like it contained a small booklet of some sort.

It's because the estimated usage was much lower than I was expecting, and just over half the amount actually showing on my meter.  I was expecting the usual larger than actual estimated bill again this month, especially because the actual from the same period last year was one of those outrageously high "catch up bills" resulting from the company's failure to read meters.

So, how did the company come up with this month's ridiculously low usage estimate?  If you sat through December's PSC hearing on the General Investigation of the company's billing, meter reading and customer service practices, you'd know that the company has two estimation routines in place.  One uses same period from prior year, adjusted to current weather and days in billing period.  The other uses prior month data.

A phone call to a delightful customer service representative named Kelly advised me that my bill was based on prior year actual.  Using the handy-dandy usage history graph on my current bill, I find that my last year same period was over 4,000 kwh.  So, Kelly informs me that because the company "renumbered" me and adjusted my billing period, the current estimate also used some data from the following month on my bar graph.  That month's usage was 2,406.  So, Potomac Edison's average of 4000 and 2406 is 2,576?  No wonder there's an investigation going on.  Helpful and pleasant Kelly offered to adjust my bill because we determined that my next month actual reading will produce an outrageous bill.  But, it really doesn't matter since I am on the average payment plan.  However, many Potomac Edison customers whose bills were estimated by the same method mine was this month may not be.  Those customers are going to get gigantic bills next month, bills they may be unable to pay.  As if that's not bad enough, the unusually cold weather is going to exacerbate this problem tremendously.

I thought I heard FirstEnergy telling the PSC Commissioners that it had solved all the estimation routine problems.  It looks like that's not true, and a whole new wave of unhappy customers is quietly building and should start crashing in during the month of February.  How much longer is this going to go on?  How much longer are West Virginians supposed to put up with this stunning incompetence?  Let's get with the program here, PSC!

So, in conclusion, let's add a little levity by going back to my intro. paragraph and examining the reason for my unusually bulky bill.  That was because it contained ELEVEN (11), count 'em 11, copies of this month's bill insert.  The insert urges me to sign up for FirstEnergy's eBill program so I can "use less paper" which "is better for the environment."  Right, FirstEnergy, as soon as you take your own advice.  And to add one last giggle on top, my customer service rep., Kelly, offered to send me some energy efficiency literature because that's what she's been instructed to do when she gets a high bill call.  But, wait a sec, FirstEnergy has been fighting against energy efficiency programs in West Virginia (and many other states).  As well, maybe customers wouldn't have such high bills if the company read every meter every month until it established accurate base data and corrected its hideously inaccurate estimation routines.  Does FirstEnergy have any literature on that problem?  Probably not.

Loving those "merger synergies," FirstEnergy!
0 Comments

Will Midwest States Become the Next West Virginia?

1/23/2014

0 Comments

 
The West Virginia water crisis has generated a whole bunch of national media attention on West Virginia's status as the east coast's dumping ground.

This isn't a new story, it's actually a very old story.  The long and short of it is that the people and environment of West Virginia have been prostituted to out-of-state business interests by their own elected officials.  The people of West Virginia have long sacrificed for the needs of others, and all they have to show for it is crushing poverty and a fouled environment.  All the money ends up in the pockets of its out-of-state overlords.  I told this story to the people of Illinois during a public hearing on the Rock Island Clean Line project last fall.

Now, Salon tells West Virginia's story to the rest of the country.

Is there a lesson to be learned here?  How easily could wind-rich Midwest states be substituted for West Virginia in this article?
The people of West Virginia had made clear demands: put land and people first.  The companies did neither, but continued on their profit-driven rampage destroying huge swaths of the West Virginia mountains – one of the world’s most beautiful landscapes – with mountaintop removal for cheaper access to coal, exposing residents to toxic air pollution in order to provide the rest of the nation with cheap energy.  The decisions made in the early 1970s are what got us here today, with hundreds of thousands of people spending days unsure when they would be able to drink their water again, with many remaining unsure as pipe flushing and other cleanup procedures have been ineffective.
Think huge industrial wind farms and miles and miles of high voltage transmission lines are harmless?

Wind farms could endanger small aircraft
Wind turbines throw ice
Wind farms can drive you crazy
Wind farms have a multitude of adverse effects

New high voltage transmission lines also have adverse effects and will take thousands of acres of the nation's most productive farm land out of production.


The people of Illinois, Iowa, Kansas and Missouri have made clear demands:  put the land and people first.  Clean Line Energy Partners have done neither, but continue on their profit-driven rampage intent on destroying huge swaths of America's farmland -- one of the world's most productive food producers -- with acres of wind farms and miles of transmission lines for cheaper access to renewable electricity, exposing residents to economic and health risks in order to provide the rest of the nation with cheap energy.  The decisions made today will be the history of tomorrow.

And if we don't learn from history, we are bound to repeat it.

0 Comments

Another Cold Snap, Another Request for Energy Efficiency

1/23/2014

0 Comments

 
PJM Interconnection has again put out a press release asking customers to practice energy efficiency during unusually cold weather.  This is starting to become a regular occurrence -- PJM also asked customers to conserve power earlier this month.

The first request was blamed on generator outages related to the cold weather.  Today's request is also blamed on generation shortages, however, it has (so far) been limited to just two utilities in Maryland, Baltimore Gas & Electric (BGE) and Potomac Electric Power Company (PEPCO).

Interestingly enough, Maryland's electric consumption exceeds its native generation capacity.  The U.S. Dept. of Energy's Energy Information Administration reports:
The state's electricity consumption exceeds its net generation, and currently more than one-third of power consumed in Maryland comes from the PJM grid.
Obviously, Maryland has been living beyond its electric means.  Dependence upon imported power from other states isn't looking like such a good plan tonight.

But, don't blame Maryland.  The state tried to encourage the development of new in-state generation last year, only to have its plan attacked by PJM, the Market Monitor, and the out-of-state generators who supply expensive electricity to Marylanders, and eventually the plan was slapped down in federal court.

Good work, PJM! 
0 Comments

Arkansas Ratepayer Files Formal Challenge of American Electric Power's FERC Transmission Rate

1/23/2014

1 Comment

 
Complaint Alleges AEP's SWEPCO subsidiary overcharged regional ratepayers for transmission charges in 2012
Martha Peine of Eureka Springs, Arkansas, has filed a complaint with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), alleging that American Electric Power’s SWEPCO transmission subsidiary has improperly charged thousands of dollars in lobbying, advertising, charitable contributions, and other non-transmission expenditures to ratepayers in Southwest Power Pool’s nine-state region, which includes portions of Arkansas.

Electric ratepayer Peine filed her Formal Challenge to American Electric Power Service Corporation’s 2013 Formula Rate Annual Update with the FERC on Wednesday.   Her examination of transmission rates, conducted under federal transparency rules, revealed AEP has improperly charged Arkansas ratepayers for general advertising and promotional expenses, charitable donations and related expenses, economic development expenses unrelated to transmission, lobbying expenses, merger expenses, and other non-transmission expenses totaling $92,511.  The complaint asks that FERC grant the challenge and order refunds to ratepayers of amounts wrongly included in rates.

According to Peine, “The problem has been that no one reviews these FERC filings on a micro-level to determine if unallowable expenses are included.”

AEP/SWEPCO has already acknowledged over $16,000 in wrongful charges as a result of Peine’s discovery efforts, and has made provisions to credit ratepayers for this amount.  However, Peine contends that an additional $95K was also wrongly charged to electric customers in their monthly bills and has not yet been refunded.

The total includes expenses such as lunch with Larry Smith, mayor of Cave Springs, and others in November 2012 while presenting a big-fat-check to the Illinois River Watershed Partnership for the development of a 30-acre watershed sanctuary at Cave Springs. Mayor Smith later gave testimony before the APSC that SWEPCO’s preferred route 33 is perfectly reasonable, even though it would damage the Trail of Tears and National Military Park at Pea Ridge, and that the alternate route proposed to pass through his own city was not reasonable.

Other corporate expenses incorrectly recovered from all AEP ratepayers, including its Arkansas transmission subsidiaries, were expenses for AEP’s “Lemonade Stand” TV commercial that AEP ran during a particularly nasty Ohio regulatory battle with rival FirstEnergy in 2012.  The commercial attempted to influence the Public Utility Commission of Ohio’s decision in a case involving AEP’s corporate reorganization to comply with Ohio’s electric deregulation laws.

Oh... ho ho ho... the Lemonade Ad?

You didn't recover that from ratepayers, did you, AEP?  Tsk, tsk, tsk!  I thought we advised you not to do that!

SWEPCO has 30 days to produce its answer to the charges before the federal commission.

The complaint can be downloaded here.
1 Comment

How Clean Energy Is Killing Itself

1/22/2014

0 Comments

 
Remember when clean energy was just a cute little infant that everyone adored?  Pampered with government incentives and pats on the head by the media and celebrities, clean energy was the epitome of positive change.  Eventually, clean energy cut teeth and learned to walk, and people adored it more than ever.

Now clean energy has entered its sullen, teen aged years and suddenly it's not so cherubic anymore.  Clean energy has become demanding, shrill and arrogant, and average Americans are turning away.  The messenger is killing the message.

Last week, a collection of environmental interest groups berated President Obama for not moving fast enough on climate change to suit their environmental goals.

A chastising response from Obama advisor John Podesta ended with this sentence:
In the meantime, we will continue to welcome your advice, based on your very long  experience on how to convince the American
public of the need and opportunity to  transform dirty energy systems to ones that  are cleaner and more efficient.
Was that a tongue-in-cheek dig at the way these organizations may be driving away the American people with their militant concentration on their own management goals, instead of issues that matter to the members who keep the organization solvent?  These environmental organizations may have lost touch with the American public, and perhaps the only thing they are convincing them of lately is to cancel their memberships and turn their backs.

It's taken us hundreds of years to get to this point, and climate change isn't going to be fixed this month, this year, or maybe even this century.  Certainly not within the lifetimes of the current crop of arrogant clean energy advocates pouring out of our educational system, who seem to believe that arrogant disparagement is a useful tool to convince others to adopt their own sense of urgency in realizing their personal clean energy goals.

The false sense of urgency being pushed on the American public would require them to buy into the rhetoric that clean energy must be accomplished right now by plunging headlong into enabling big wind's big profits, and fostering social injustice by taking from one segment of society in order to make the needs of others more climate friendly.  This is not a sustainable plan and it is being soundly rejected by the American public.

"So what?", clean energy may say.  "We'll force them to adopt our clean energy plans!"

Not so fast.  The American public holds title to land needed by the big Midwest wind-a-thon, and they're not giving up easily.  It's turning into a political clash of epic proportions, and the landowners and voters have dug in their heels for a long, messy battle.  Now clean energy must find a way to part land from landowner if it intends to move forward.

Is the CFRA's report on transmission opposition "issues" going to do the trick?  Probably not.

Will a couple of Fresh Energy executives playing the part of an impartial news source help?

Communications. To achieve results, we must move the national narrative around clean energy and climate. Stories that show the economic benefits of a clean energy economy and positive, science-based discussions about clean energy, climate, and health are keys to progress. Fresh Energy has expanded our commitment to become a clean energy communications leader, as producers of the regional online news site Midwest  Energy News and in debate-changing strategic communications efforts.
Fresh Energy's Midwest Energy News "is a news site and we don’t take policy positions," according to its editor.  However, here’s Fresh Energy’s “policy” on transmission:
Wind power is a major ingredient in the transition to a clean energy economy. But to make it work, we need transmission lines that
bring electricity from windy areas to urban centers. If we do it right, wind blowing on the Great Plains will keep the lights on in
Minneapolis, Chicago, and Detroit, creating new jobs, protecting our air and water, and reducing reliance on dirty coal power.  The Midwest’s transmission grid is managed by the Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO), one of the largest transmission organizations in the world. Fresh Energy has been working with MISO and a network of partners to plan for 17 new multi-value transmission lines in the region, ensuring they are financed fairly and designed in a way that maximizes clean energy use and saves  customers money. A strong, regional transmission backbone reduces dependence on coal plants. Determining how transmission lines are sited and routed—and how  landowners are compensated—is a crucial step. With our technical knowledge and commitment to community livability, Fresh Energy is playing a key role in this process. As Fresh Energy and its partners continue the push for more clean energy in Minnesota and the upper Midwest,
we’re setting the stage for the next set of transmission lines
that will make or break our ability to fully harness the potential of the wind.
Take a look at what happened when Midwest Energy News published a glowing review of the CFRA report and a handful of landowners posted comments on the story. Landowners were challenged to answer the editor's argumentative questions, and had their own comments unfairly summarized and re-written by the editor.  Although he keeps determining that the discussion has "run its course," he just keeps coming back to have the last word.... 61 comments on the article and counting...

Did the Midwest Energy News editor's "conversation" with landowners help them see the light about clean energy?  Or did it just make them more determined to put a stop to what they see as short-sighted and unacceptable energy initiatives to build a coast-to-coast transmission "superhighway" to enable Enron-style energy trading?
  Or maybe they simply concluded that clean energy is a bully and a brat?

A true, sustainable, clean energy future is going to require thoughtful and empathetic leadership over the long term, and the patience to develop new technologies that provide real benefit to everyone.  Clean Energy is not yet mature.
0 Comments

FirstEnergy Slashes Dividend - Sigh, Scribble, UT-OH!

1/22/2014

0 Comments

 
Sometimes it's worth getting to work early to enjoy a little schadenfreude!  FirstEnergy put on a special show for investment analysts this morning in the wake of the company's announcement yesterday that it would FINALLY be cutting its dividend to reflect the mess our pal Tony the Trickster has made of the company.

Investors have long used the services of voice analysts to pick up clues that indicate CEO lying.  In response, companies have done a better job preparing their CEOs to mask verbal tells.  And then there was today's FirstEnergy call...  no fancy voice analyst needed!  It was obvious to anyone tuning in that Tony was very put upon to be there and have to answer questions.  Very pointed questions.

The call began with much heavy sighing and attitude, and if that wasn't enough, once the questions from analysts began, the sound of someone scribbling furiously on a piece of paper to feed answers to company officials kept getting louder... and louder... and louder.  Right.... that's the sound of a healthy company poised for enormous growth....

So, what's Tony's next great plan?  Betting on guaranteed earnings from FirstEnergy's regulated business.  If you've been listening in on the earnings calls of Ohio's utility Tweedledum and Tweedledee over the past few years, you may note that Tony the Trickster was so focused on "beating" rival AEP in the Ohio retail market, that he didn't see what was sneaking up behind him.  AEP was forced to retreat from its competitive business a lot sooner, because FirstEnergy was so willing to take quantity over quality in order to sign up the most customers in Ohio.  Fortunately for AEP, concentrating on its regulated business a lot sooner than FirstEnergy saved it from a lot of sighing and scribbling.

Oh, that competition thing... it can make smart men do really stupid things.  Tony the Trickster got all offended when asked if the company would need to continue to inject cash in its loser competitive business segment, or if that part of the business would begin supporting itself.  Truth hurts, doesn't it?

FirstEnergy finds itself squarely behind the curve now, so the next great plan is to start pumping money (i.e. "investing") into its regulated transmission business.  What can go wrong with this plan?  Lots. 

FirstEnergy also plans to file base rate cases in West Virginia and Pennsylvania this year, despite the fact that its JCP&L rate case in New Jersey hasn't actually "derisked" the company.  Tony forgot to tell analysts that it must file a West Virginia rate case as a result of its dumping of the Harrison power station into West Virginia's regulated system, not that it wants to file a rate case to increase earnings.

Tony says that "reality" caused the company to most effectively "reposition" itself because now is the time to make a move to eliminate uncertainty, speculation and rumors by refocusing the company.

You believe him, don't you?
0 Comments

Wind Wars - Talking Dollars and Sense

1/16/2014

10 Comments

 
The battle between renewables and fossil fuel generation has taught us all that it's good to be "green."  However, "green" comes in many shades.  There are also many internal battles going on inside the renewables world.  One of the most concerning is the "big wind" battle pitting onshore wind companies against offshore wind companies.

There's lots of money to be made by harnessing the wind.  It's a "free" resource, and our green-hungry society is clamoring to feel good about themselves by financially supporting it.

But all wind isn't good wind.  The idea behind "green" is that it's a sustainable resource.  A sustainable resource is one that is defined as "conserving an ecological balance by avoiding depletion of natural resources."

Onshore wind is not sustainable.  It requires the depletion of one of our most valuable resources, the  productive farmland that feeds and sustains us. It requires taking something from those less economically advantaged and politically connected and giving it to others with the right economic and political connections. Centralized onshore wind generation is taking over our farming communities with turbines and huge new transmission lines to feed it to far flung coastal cities thousands of miles away.  There, arrogant, urban environmentalists can feast hungrily on their expensive "green" energy, believing that they are helping sustain the planet.  Nothing could be further from the truth!

Offshore wind doesn't require new transmission rights of way across privately-held land.  It doesn't require much new land-based transmission at all.  The development will take place miles offshore and be fed to the coastal cities via a few new radial lines.  However, offshore wind has been blocked by economically and politically advantaged individuals who don't want distant wind turbines mucking up their sea views.  Instead, they would rather the rest of us suck it up and make a sacrifice to provide for their needs.

Onshore wind is much further along in the development process and is therefore less pricey than its offshore cousin.  However, onshore wind has reached the saturation point where billions must now be spent developing new transmission to serve it.  This brings us to the tipping point where we must decide our own energy future.

Will we finally move forward on offshore transmission located in our own back yards, or will we choose to spend just as much foisting the burden off on others by building new transmission for onshore wind?

Let's examine the economics of both proposals.

Onshore wind claims that its new transmission projects will provide 5000+ temporary construction jobs and 500+ operations jobs.  None of these suspiciously rounded claims are backed up by source data, so we can't be sure how they were calculated to determine their veracity.
  The jobs and economic benefits claimed by onshore wind are intended to be realized by the communities where the line is located.  For the example, that would be the states of Kansas, Missouri, Illinois and Indiana.  Coastal consumers buying this wind product would be sending their energy dollars to other states and into the pockets of foreign transmission project investors.

The U.S. Department of Energy just released comparable economic data for offshore wind.
  The data for offshore wind development off the mid-Atlantic coast predicts 6000+ temporary construction jobs and more than 2,300 operations jobs.  Offshore wind will keep your energy dollars at home in the mid-Atlantic region, providing jobs and economic benefits in the communities who consume the energy produced.

Local economic benefits from imported onshore wind:  0

Local economic benefits from local offshore wind:  $$$


The
choice is yours.

10 Comments
<<Previous
Forward>>

    About the Author

    Keryn Newman blogs here at StopPATH WV about energy issues, transmission policy, misguided regulation, our greedy energy companies and their corporate spin.
    In 2008, AEP & Allegheny Energy's PATH joint venture used their transmission line routing etch-a-sketch to draw a 765kV line across the street from her house. Oooops! And the rest is history.

    About
    StopPATH Blog

    StopPATH Blog began as a forum for information and opinion about the PATH transmission project.  The PATH project was abandoned in 2012, however, this blog was not.

    StopPATH Blog continues to bring you energy policy news and opinion from a consumer's point of view.  If it's sometimes snarky and oftentimes irreverent, just remember that the truth isn't pretty.  People come here because they want the truth, instead of the usual dreadful lies this industry continues to tell itself.  If you keep reading, I'll keep writing.


    Need help opposing unneeded transmission?
    Email me


    Search This Site

    Got something to say?  Submit your own opinion for publication.

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010

    Categories

    All
    $$$$$$
    2023 PJM Transmission
    Aep Vs Firstenergy
    Arkansas
    Best Practices
    Best Practices
    Big Winds Big Lie
    Can Of Worms
    Carolinas
    Citizen Action
    Colorado
    Corporate Propaganda
    Data Centers
    Democracy Failures
    DOE Failure
    Emf
    Eminent Domain
    Events
    Ferc Action
    FERC Incentives Part Deux
    Ferc Transmission Noi
    Firstenergy Failure
    Good Ideas
    Illinois
    Iowa
    Kansas
    Land Agents
    Legislative Action
    Marketing To Mayberry
    MARL
    Missouri
    Mtstorm Doubs Rebuild
    Mtstormdoubs Rebuild
    New Jersey
    New Mexico
    Newslinks
    NIETC
    Opinion
    Path Alternatives
    Path Failures
    Path Intimidation Attempts
    Pay To Play
    Potomac Edison Investigation
    Power Company Propaganda
    Psc Failure
    Rates
    Regulatory Capture
    Skelly Fail
    The Pjm Cartel
    Top Ten Clean Line Mistakes
    Transource
    Valley Link Transmission
    Washington
    West Virginia
    Wind Catcher
    Wisconsin

Copyright 2010 StopPATH WV, Inc.