StopPATH WV
  • News
  • StopPATH WV Blog
  • FAQ
  • Events
  • Fundraisers
  • Make a Donation
  • Landowner Resources
  • About PATH
  • Get Involved
  • Commercials
  • Links
  • About Us
  • Contact

FERC Orders $7M Refund of PATH Advertising, Lobbying and Front Group Costs

1/20/2017

5 Comments

 
On January 21, 2011, Ali Haverty and I filed a "Formal Challenge to Potomac-Appalachian Transmission Highline, LLC 2010 Formula Rate Annual Update." This was after several months of rather frustrating information requests to an active and threatening PATH transmission project.  We had no expertise or legal help, we simply did the best we could with available processes.

Now, nearly 6 years later, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has confirmed our contentions that PATH should not have collected from ratepayers the costs of its reliable power coalitions (West Virginians for Reliable Power, Marylanders for Reliable Power and Virginians for Reliable Energy), its PATH Education Awareness Team (or "PEAT"), its memberships in civic and social groups, its lobbying for release of a conservation easement in Loudoun County, Virginia, its hiring of a well-connected lobbyist in West Virginia, its cost of public opinion polling and focus groups in West Virginia, Virginia and Maryland, and the cost of all of PATH's television, radio and print advertising promoting its project in all three states.  The Commission has ordered PATH to refund these costs (plus unearned return and interest) to millions of ratepayers in PJM's 13-state region.
It truly was no bed of roses.  We combed through hundreds of thousands of documents, learned FERC's accounting rules, learned how to write and file all sorts of legal pleadings, made dozens of trips to FERC's offices in DC, and suffered through some middle of the nighters in order to meet deadlines.  We've spent the past 6 years jumping one hurdle after another to get to this point.

And we're still friends.  Never once did we consider giving up or splitting our team.  No matter how heavy the burden, we kept our eyes on the prize.

Opinion No. 554
Picture
The Commission also ordered accounting transactions to remove an additional $1.1M of public relations & advertising expenses PATH booked to its asset account in 2008, before Ali and I began to challenge PATH's annual rate filings.  This $1.1M of cost has been sitting neatly in an account where it earned 14.3% (and then 10.4%) return on equity for the PATH companies every year since.  Not only will PATH have to deduct those costs from its ultimate recovery, it has also been ordered to make a compliance filing to essentially correct and replace each of its annual accounting filings for the past 8 years.  This approach allows crediting of that undue return to ratepayers.  So, while the total disallowance to PATH is more than $7.1M, the total ratepayer credit effected will be much more.

We appreciate the Commission's order, and our overall experience at FERC.  In an era where the agency has been kicked around by protestors and the media, we can honestly say that we were treated well by FERC staff, judges, and commissioners.  We never felt dismissed or marginalized.  We felt that our concerns were heard.

We wouldn't change a thing.
Picture
5 Comments

Clean Line's Choo-Choo Runs Out of Steam

1/17/2017

2 Comments

 
"Full steam, ahead!" said the Little Engine That Thought He Could.  But when confronted with all the landowners he'd previously tied to the tracks with the hope of running them over, it turned out that he couldn't.  He didn't have enough steam.

"I can't, I can't, I can't, I can't get over these hurdles," said the Little Engine That Couldn't.  "Wheeze, cough, sputter," went the Engine.  "Where are my customers?" whined the Engine as its wheels fell off and it puffed mightily to a full stop. 

"Where are my customerssssssssss..."
KUAR reports that Clean Line has filed a motion at  U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas in Jonesboro, asking that the Court speed up its hearing process because the lawsuit is hindering the company's progress in finding financing for its project.

KUAR also points out:
When asked in November whether the federal lawsuit will slow the project’s intended construction start following the delivery of a HVDC converter station in Pope County, Clean Line Founder and President Michael Skelly said the transmission project is moving “full steam ahead.”
Plains & Eastern isn't steaming anywhere without financing, despite claims that its "schedule" is set for construction to begin in the second half of 2017.

That's just not happening.  Clean Line has its eggs mixed up with its chickens.  While it's probably true that nobody wants to finance a transmission project with a pending lawsuit hanging over its head, the bigger problem here is that Plains & Eastern has no customers.  None.  Without customers, the project has no projected revenue.  It's just like asking for a loan when you're unemployed.  Just.not.happening.

Clean Line has neatly lined up all its own business failures in a row and blamed it all on the lawsuit.
“Utilities will have to contract for energy to deliver to their customers with specific dates in mind. A delay in this matter has the potential to delay the entirety of the project as financing institutions require a high degree of certainty – meaning a low risk of legal and regulatory obstacles – prior to committing the capital to make multi-billion dollar investments required to construct the project and the wind generation that the project will enable,” Heister continued. “Because of the interconnected nature of all of the various project participants, even small schedule delays can lead to cascading impacts.”
Then why didn't Clean Line have any customers before the lawsuit was filed?  The U.S. DOE agreed to "participate" in the transmission project last March.  The lawsuit wasn't filed until mid-August.

Clean Line can't get financing because of the lawsuit.
Clean Line can't get customers because of the lawsuit.
Clean Line's project will be delayed because of the lawsuit.
Wind farms cannot be built because of the lawsuit.
And, worst of all, any delay in the project would push back the date “on which the public benefits from new renewable energy generation" (!!!)

What generation?  I don't see any generation.  Because of the lawsuit.

That lawsuit!  It's the only reason Clean Line hasn't fired up the bulldozers yet! 

Want to be part of the winning team?  Golden Bridge, the landowner group behind the lawsuit, is still accepting new members.  Check it out!

And, hey, remember that Clean Line is having this gigantic fit in front of a federal court judge because it wants a hearing to be held one month sooner than the judge has scheduled.  One month.  A one month scheduling delay is going to make or break this project, or so Clean Line says. 

Clean Line has been trying to build this project since 2009.  That's eight years. Eight.  And suddenly one month is the difference between success and failure.  Maybe Clean Line is planning to run out of money sometime between October and November of this year and won't be around for a November court date?

And isn't it funny... the lawsuit claims that due process was never afforded to Arkansans during the DOE's Section 1222 process.  And now Clean Line wants a judge to speed up the routine hearing process as well.  Talk about adding insult to injury...

And what about those "conditions precedent" in Clean Line's "Participation Agreement" with the DOE?  These are the conditions Clean Line must satisfy in order for the DOE to "participate" in eminent domain land takings:
  1. Customers.  The project must present fully executed term sheets with customers.
  2. Executed interconnection agreements with regional grid operators.
  3. Insurance that holds the United States of America harmless for any of Clean Line's issues.
  4. Financing.  The project must have money with which to build.
So, if the Court moves the hearing date to October, will all these conditions be magically satisfied so that Mike Skelly can jump behind the wheel of his bulldozer?

Nope.

Clean Line needs to quit blaming others and own its failure.  Quit embarrassing yourself.

Update:  Oh, snap!  The judge has denied Clean Line's motion.
2 Comments

Buried Transmission Line Gets Permit:  Full Steam Ahead!

1/13/2017

2 Comments

 
ITC's Lake Erie Connector transmission project received its Presidential Permit from the U.S. DOE yesterday.

It's full steam ahead for the project!

Unlike other HVDC transmission projects that have been struggling to get their aerial routes approved for the past eight years, Lake Erie Connector sailed through approvals in just a couple years.  Why?
The ITC Lake Erie Connector is a +/- 320 kV HVDC bi-directional transmission line, approximately 73 miles in length, that would interconnect with converter stations located in Erie, Pennsylvania and Nanticoke, Ontario.

A 345kV Alternating Current (AC) underground transmission line would connect the Erie converter station to Penelec's existing Erie West substation, while a 500kV AC line would tie the Nanticoke converter station to Hydro One’s Nanticoke substation.

The majority of the transmission line would be buried beneath Lake Erie or underground using existing roadway rights-of-way. ITC anticipates the project receiving all state, federal, and provincial permits for the ITC Lake Erie Connector by Q2 2017, commencing construction in 2017, and being in service in Q4 2020.

Let's say that again:
Will overhead transmission lines be used?

No. The current project plan envisions all of the cable being installed underwater or underground.

Underground, out of sight, along public rights of way.  No significant or sustained opposition.

And a good time was had by all.
2 Comments

Dominion's Boogeyman Fails to Scare Tidewater

1/13/2017

0 Comments

 
Dominion upped the ante on its Surry-Skiffes Creek transmission project this week.  Because it has not been successful in overcoming opposition to an aerial crossing of the James River, it introduced the blackout boogeyman in the form of a remediation plan for the area, filed with regional grid operator PJM.
The so-called remedial action scheme Dominion prepared and presented this week to PJM Interconnection, the operator of the 13-state electrical grid Virginia is plugged into, would cut power to Hampton, two-thirds of Newport News, Poquoson and eastern York County if there are faults on two of the dozens of components in the Peninsula's high transmission network.
Oh no!  Blackouts, you say?

The people of the Tidewater said, "meh."
They say Dominion's been using scare tactics when it has said there could be as many as 80 days a year in which rolling blackouts are possible. Dominion says that's the number of days when demand is so heavy that faults in the system could force it to cut some customers off in order to avoid a widespread blackout.

"It appears that Dominion Virginia Power would rather continue their campaign to frighten consumers and threaten to close their Yorktown power plants," said James Zinn, a trustee with the Save the James Alliance, who argues that federal law allows the U.S. Department of Energy to order a power plant to operate in an emergency.
Well, gosh, PJM better get to altering its transmission plans in order to avoid emergency, because that's just not acceptable, and it doesn't appear that the opposition is going to fold on this one.
"If nothing else, this is consistent with their continued inflexibility to consider less intrusive alternatives for their construction of towers over the historic James River," he said.
So, what could they do instead?  Bury the line underwater?  Ya think?  Honestly, Dominion, you're behaving like a 5-year old.  "I'm gonna hold my breath until I die!"  Stop being a pimple on the ass of progress.
0 Comments

Clean Line Business Plan May Be Beyond Reporter's Grasp

1/13/2017

2 Comments

 
The Arkansas Business reporter who attempted to speak for landowners last year is back to assure everyone that the Plains & Eastern Clean Line is sure to be a favorite of the new Trump administration.  Maybe it was hard to breathe in there and he got a little confused?  Or maybe he just doesn't have enough information because he's been talking to the wrong people?

Kyle Massey insists:
... a GOP penchant for infrastructure projects and commerce-building is expected to favor endeavors like the Plains & Eastern Clean Line, a $2 billion plan for transmitting wind power across 12 Arkansas counties from Oklahoma to near Memphis.
Let's parse that statement.  Massey says Plains & Eastern is expected to be "favored."  Favored?  How is that exactly?  What might a GOP administration actually do to "favor" the project?  Does this mean that the administration will somehow step outside the law to "permit" this project?  Does it mean that a GOP administration will suddenly find a big chunk of taxpayer cash with which to build the project?  Does this mean that a GOP administration will finance the $2B project with taxpayer funds?

None of that will happen.  Because it can't happen.  The U.S. Department of Energy has already signed a Participation Agreement, in which it agrees to "participate" in the project only under certain conditions.

1.  No taxpayer or government money or loans will be used for the project.
2. The project must be fully financed before the government "participates."
3.  The  project must have confirmed customers for its transmission capacity before the government "participates" in eminent domain activities to secure needed right of way.

There's absolutely no way for any administration to further "favor" the Plains & Eastern project to assure that it gets built.

Plains & Eastern is a "merchant" transmission project.  That means that the company takes on all the market risk for the project.  If there is no market for the project, it cannot be financed and built because it has no revenue stream to pay for construction.  Only potential customers can volunteer to buy capacity and create a revenue stream.  It has no captive ratepayers forced to shoulder its costs and guarantee repayment of financing.

And Plains & Eastern has no customers.  No utilities have volunteered to become customers.  No "fortune 500 companies" have volunteered to become customers.  Fortune 500 companies do not buy power and transmission directly, but are served by their local utility franchise.  So no matter how much they may be clambering for renewable energy, the companies do not decide where it is procured, or how it is transmitted.  The utility makes that choice.  The utility has a responsibility to provide its captive ratepayers with the cheapest resource available.  So, sure, big companies do carelessly throw their names onto ineffectual letters that pretty much say nothing.  But they do so at their own risk... the risk that their customers may find their penchant for eminent domain to accomplish their corporate greenwashing goals repugnant and stop shopping at their stores or buying their products.  While it is generally accepted that "green is good," and that greenwashed companies are favored by the public, that changes when the greenwashing encourages the eminent domain taking of customer private property.  Do I want my shampoo made with green energy?  Do I want my shampoo made with green energy that hinders the productivity and profitability of a chicken farmer in Arkansas?  No, the "green" doesn't spread that far.  Maybe Unilever is going to produce, and Walmart is going to sell, new Eminent Domain Guilt Shampoo?  Lather, ruin someone's dream, rinse.  Repeat the misery.

Massey's dream is buoyed along by academia.
Academic voices say the trend toward renewables may be too entrenched to be crippled by Washington. Trump “can eliminate subsidies for solar power as well as electric cars, and he may not be very supportive of renewable energy, but ultimately technology and market forces will be the determining forces,” said Rajesh Sharma, an Arkansas State University assistant professor and expert in renewable energy technology. “Clean technology is advancing every year and costs are going down.”
Actually, the subsidies for industrial wind are already on the chopping block and were reduced 20% on January 1, with additional reductions to come every year until phased out completely by 2021.  Wind is going to get more expensive when tax credits evaporate,  not cheaper.  Economics aren't going to help Plains & Eastern.  The project failed to attract customers when the tax credits were highest, and a GOP administration is likely to further dampen enthusiasm for expensive power that utilities aren't required by law to buy.  Even our pal Mikey Skelly acknowledges that.
Skelly sees opposition to the Clean Power Plan as “probably a net negative” to his ambitious project...
Massey's prediction, masquerading as "news," holds no greater weight than the prognostication of someone else.

And with the help of Wayne and Garth we will now enter our own dream sequence...
President Trump:  "What's this Plains & Eastern Clean Line?"
Secretary of Energy Perry:  "It's a 700-mile electric transmission line that will encourage the building of thousands of new wind turbines in red states."
President Trump:  "Does it have any customers?"
Secretary of Energy Perry:  "No.  Even the previous administration wasn't capable of 'favoring' it enough to attract customers."
President Trump:  "Do the Republicans want it to be built?"
Secretary of Energy Perry:  "No.  As a matter of fact, the entire Republican delegation from the State of Arkansas is vehemently opposed to it because it is just so much federal overreach."
President Trump:  "$@$& that!  Plains & Eastern Clean Line, you're fired!"

We've all got dreams.  Some are more realistic than others.
2 Comments

FirstEnergy Needs You To Toss Them a Rope

1/12/2017

0 Comments

 
Awwww.... FirstEnergy had a bad year in 2016.
"There's blood in the water," Jones said in an October interview.

He added, "We've reduced benefits, we've reduced 401(k) matches, we froze wages. We've done a lot of things to try and offset lost revenue, but couldn't offset it entirely … We're evaluating everything we do as a company to try and find a way to close that gap. Because (what's been done so far) is not enough to get us into the position with the credit rating agencies that we need to be in."
And I'm sure Chatty Chuck took a huge pay cut and stopped wasting the company's profits on football stadium signage, too.  Wait!  What?  That didn't happen?

Well, there always selling another antique coal-fired electric generating station to captive customers in West Virginia!  I'm pretty sure they're going to try that next as a way to position themselves properly with the credit rating agencies.  Because even though FirstEnergy's money problems were of their own making, they want West Virginians to bail them out.  Again.
Pleasants, currently owned by a Mon Power sister company, Allegheny Energy Supply, is an aging, coal-fired plant that hasn’t been generating the returns investors want in Ohio’s deregulated energy marketplace. FirstEnergy CEO Charles E. Jones, on at least two occasions in 2016, told analysts the company wanted to shift plants like Pleasants that weren’t making investors enough money in Ohio into West Virginia’s regulated market, saying, “I think later this year, they’ll start (looking) at it seriously, and it’s up to (the West Virginia Public Service Commission) to decide, would Pleasants be the appropriate solution.”
And so that's what they did, issuing a narrow and completely opague Request for Proposals that could only be fulfilled by the sale of Pleasants to West Virginia regulated FirstEnergy subsidiaries Mon Power and Potomac Edison.  Once the transaction is completed, electric customers of the two local utilities will pay all the operational costs of the plant, along with a guaranteed profit.  That ought to cheer up the credit rating agencies, right?

Well, only if it happens.  Only if you allow it to happen.  What can you do?  Stay educated.  Stay tuned... 
0 Comments

New York Jumps on Economic Potential of Offshore Wind

1/12/2017

0 Comments

 
New York's governor recently announced a commitment to 2400 MW of offshore wind.  And people got excited.
“Governor Cuomo’s bold commitment to harvest New York’s abundant offshore wind power could make us a regional hub for offshore wind development, creating jobs and attracting significant industry investments, while allowing the state to reach its 50 percent renewable energy mandate,” Gordian Raacke, Executive Director of Renewable Energy Long Island said.
That's right... by tapping the huge renewable resource right outside their own front door, the citizens of New York not only get cleaner power, they also get the jobs and economic development that come along with new industry.  The more they build, the cheaper offshore wind becomes, and best of all, nobody has to sacrifice their land and way of life to support the energy needs of someone else.  New York can spend its energy dollars in its own community.

And just in case some billionaires get their panties in a wad about the offshore turbines spoiling their sea views, Governor Cuomo assured New Yorkers:
They will not be visible from the beach. They will be 30 miles southeast of Montauk. Not even Superman standing on Montauk Point could see these wind farms.
Superman?  I think he meant super rich man.  While it's reassuring that New York's offshore wind isn't going to intrude on anyone's property rights, this begs the question of why any property rights anywhere should be compromised in the name of cleaner energy?  Midwest wind shipped to the east coast via gigantic and expensive new transmission lines was last decade's idea.  Get over it.  Move on.  Offshore wind and a booming new coastal industry is the future.

It's good news that New York has created a win-win for its citizens by taking responsibility for its own energy needs.  Bravo!  Now maybe our heartland can get back to the important business of feeding America, instead of being continually hounded to make huge sacrifices to their heritage, profit and productivity in order to charge America's iPhone.

First it was Rhode Island, now New York.  And Massachusetts has also made a commitment to offshore wind.  Who else wants to get into the game?
0 Comments

Clean Line Deathwatch Victim #2:   Southwire

1/8/2017

7 Comments

 
Clean Line "preferred vendor" Southwire joined compatriot General Cable in the cemetery of good intentions this week.
Picture
Southwire announced that it will be closing its Flora, Illinois facility in the first quarter of this year.  That's a lot of permanent jobs that will disappear from southern Illinois.  And another of Clean Line's "strategic alliances" bites the dust.

Rock Island Clean Line's "strategic alliance" with Southwire:
Clean Line recently announced an agreement with Southwire, designating Southwire as the preferred supplier of the overhead transmission wire for the Rock Island Clean Line. The agreement anticipates that the wire will be produced in Southwire’s facility in Flora, Illinois, where the company employs approximately 130 people. Clean Line and Southwire announced the agreement on March 6, 2012, at the American Wind Energy Association’s Regional Wind Energy Summit- Midwest.
Grain Belt Express Clean Line's "strategic alliance" with Southwire:
A leader in technology and innovation, Southwire Company, LLC is one of North America’s largest wire and cable producers. Southwire and its subsidiaries manufacture underground and overhead Utility products, Renewable Energy products, building wire and cable, metal-clad (MC) cable, portable and electronic cord products. Southwire also provides OEM wire products, engineered products, continuous casting technology, and products made by Technology Research, LLC and Watteredge, LLC, both subsidiaries of Southwire Company.

Southwire’s Flora, Illinois plant has more than 40 years of experience in the design and manufacturing of overhead transmission conductor. Today, the plant leverages that expertise to support large-scale transmission projects like Grain Belt Express. The Grain Belt Express project could require as much as $35 million in materials from Southwire, depending on commodity prices and other variables.
So what happens to Southwire's extra-special MOU with Clean Line to purchase transmission wire for two of its proposed projects valued at more than $100M?  Will Southwire manufacture the wire for Clean Line in another state or even another country?  How exactly does this help the state of Illinois?  And how much did the Illinois Commerce Commission depend on an increase in Illinois jobs when it approved the Rock Island and Grain Belt projects?
SPRINGFIELD (Nov. 12, 2015) – The Illinois Commerce Commission (ICC) today approved an Order granting Clean Line Energy a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity to construct and operate the Illinois portion of the 780-mile direct current Grain Belt Express Clean Line.

The project will bring approximately $700 million of private investment to the state of Illinois, create about 1,500 jobs and support Illinois manufacturing.

Clean Line is also committed to supporting local businesses and has designated Southwire Company a preferred supplier for wire for the transmission line. Southwire will manufacture the wire at its plant in Flora, Illinois.

Whoopsie!  And what about all the economic promises to Illinois touted by the Chamber of Commerce?
“The Illinois Chamber of Commerce applauds Clean Line Energy and Southwire Company for coming together to support manufacturing jobs in Illinois,” said Todd Maisch, President and CEO of the Illinois Chamber of Commerce. “Through this agreement, the Grain Belt Express Clean Line will create vital work orders for a local company. Clean Line’s commitment to hiring locally whenever possible will ensure that the Grain Belt Express will be an economic boon to the state.”
Gone with the wind.

So, let's review.  One of three Plains & Eastern Clean Line "strategic alliances" is kaput.  One of three Rock Island Clean Line "strategic alliances" is kaput.  One out of five "strategic alliances" for the Grain Belt Express Clean Line is kaput.

A MOU with a company that can't get its projects approved, financed and built can't prevent economic disaster.

Who's next?
7 Comments

Clean Line Sponsors Hen House for Utility Chickens

1/7/2017

2 Comments

 
Here chickie, chickie, chick...

Clean Line Energy Partners and the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy are "sponsoring" a "clean power summit" for southeastern states.  What a great way to herd all the southern utility chickens into the HVDC merchant transmission line hen house!

Still completely desperate for customers I see, Clean Line.  As if listening to Mario Harturdo for 45 minutes is going to result in enough transmission capacity contracts to save your project?  That's pretty pathetic.  And also amusing.
Picture
Nobody wants to contract for transmission capacity on an unbuilt transmission line that doesn't connect with any existing generators.  No generators, no transmission line, no customers!

While the vast majority of the presentations at the "summit" are about distributed generation, solar and building wind generators in the southeast, never fear, Clean Line and its environmental puppet will be making presentations touting the wonderfulness of long-distance HVDC transmission from the Midwest.  Sounds like a good time to step outside and get a cup of coffee, return some phone calls.

Here's what's timely and interesting for southeastern utilities:
  • South Carolina’s Distributed Energy Resource Act
  • Southeast Solar, Renewable Energy Policy and Rate Design Update
  • Entergy New Orleans’ Self-Build Aggregated Rooftop Solar Project
  • Management of Purchase Agreements for Both Power and RECs
  • State Utility Commissioners’ Perspectives on Clean Power in the Southeast (renewable resources policies and development in the region)
  • Distributed Solar at Florida Power & Light
  • Case Study: Designing a Community Solar + Storage Project to Meet Customer Needs
  • Community Solar: Where Are We Now?
  • Ratemaking Challenges and Solutions with Renewable Energy
  • New Hydropower at Existing Dams, Realizing the Full Potential of Existing Infrastructure
  • Net Energy Metering Across Entergy’s Jurisdictions
  • Renewable Energy Programs in the Tennessee Valley
All these topics focus on southeastern renewable resources... making the most of what's available locally.  And then there's Clean Line, and SACE, sticking out like a couple of sore thumbs.
  • Utilizing HVDC Transmission to Enhance Renewable Energy Delivery in the Southeast
    High-voltage direct current (HVDC) transmission is the most efficient technology to move large amounts of power over long distances. Utilizing HVDC, the Plains & Eastern Clean Line will provide southeastern states with access to some of the best wind energy resources in the country. Low-cost wind power delivered by this project is an essential measure to help southeastern states diversify their energy mix. This presentation will outline the measures by which Clean Line is conveying low-cost renewable energy from windy areas in the Plains States to areas with a demand for clean energy. It will also examine how Clean Line has navigated state and federal permitting processes to advance the project to construction.
Say what?  Construction?  Clean Line hasn't put one shovel anywhere near the ground yet.  And why is that?  Because Clean Line has no customers!  No customers, no eminent domain help from the U.S. DOE, and no project financing.  And, just so you know, Clean Line isn't an "essential measure" for any purpose.  Transmission lines that are "essential" would be supported by regional planning authorities.  Clean Line is not supported by any planning authority.  Clean Line is pure "build it and they will come" speculation.  Except Clean Line wants the chickens to come before they build it, and that's just not happening.

So, if the chickens aren't convinced by Mario Harturdo's presentation, there's still an opportunity to be guided to buy transmission capacity on an unbuilt transmission line to nowhere by the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy.
  • Key Considerations for Southern Wind Power    Wind power opportunities for customers in the south are expanding. North Carolina has installed its first utility-scale wind farm, highlighting the improvement of new turbine technology for in-region wind power. Utilities are beginning to focus on winter peak demand requirements, during times when power resources would provide substantial capacity. The changes in the federal production tax credit (PTC) for wind power effectively gives a four-year window, after signing a power purchase agreement, to receive power. Major proposed high voltage direct current (HVDC) transmission projects would connect exceptionally high value, low cost wind power resources to the southeast. How do these key considerations affect plans for renewable energy purchases in the next five years? What are the primary benefits, and challenges, to incorporating more wind power into the southeastern electricity mix? This segment will focus on recent changes and considerations for southern wind power and how to evaluate what opportunities exist.
Oh for the love of Woodsy Owl... the last thing a bunch of utility executives need is to be "taught" how to evaluate wind power purchases by an environmentalist.  SACE knows so much about utility renewable purchase agreements that it recently sponsored a petition asking the TVA to buy power from Clean Line Energy.  (Hint:  Clean Line does not sell power.  It is a wanna be transmission company.)  I hope Simon is planning to play loud music during his presentation to cover up all the laughter from the audience.

And for attending this glorified sales pitch, conference organizer EUCI wants you to pay $1195 in conference fees, per person, plus the cost of travel, room & board while you're whooping it up for 2 days in beautiful, warm Charleston, SC.

Sorta makes you wonder... if these "summits" have "sponsors" that are permitted to advertise their products with presentations during the "summit," why is there an additional fee to attend?  Is EUCI splitting the loot with its "sponsors?"

Heeeerrrre chickie, chick, chick...
2 Comments

    About the Author

    Keryn Newman blogs here at StopPATH WV about energy issues, transmission policy, misguided regulation, our greedy energy companies and their corporate spin.
    In 2008, AEP & Allegheny Energy's PATH joint venture used their transmission line routing etch-a-sketch to draw a 765kV line across the street from her house. Oooops! And the rest is history.

    About
    StopPATH Blog

    StopPATH Blog began as a forum for information and opinion about the PATH transmission project.  The PATH project was abandoned in 2012, however, this blog was not.

    StopPATH Blog continues to bring you energy policy news and opinion from a consumer's point of view.  If it's sometimes snarky and oftentimes irreverent, just remember that the truth isn't pretty.  People come here because they want the truth, instead of the usual dreadful lies this industry continues to tell itself.  If you keep reading, I'll keep writing.


    Need help opposing unneeded transmission?
    Email me


    Search This Site

    Got something to say?  Submit your own opinion for publication.

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010

    Categories

    All
    $$$$$$
    2023 PJM Transmission
    Aep Vs Firstenergy
    Arkansas
    Best Practices
    Best Practices
    Big Winds Big Lie
    Can Of Worms
    Carolinas
    Citizen Action
    Colorado
    Corporate Propaganda
    Data Centers
    Democracy Failures
    DOE Failure
    Emf
    Eminent Domain
    Events
    Ferc Action
    FERC Incentives Part Deux
    Ferc Transmission Noi
    Firstenergy Failure
    Good Ideas
    Illinois
    Iowa
    Kansas
    Land Agents
    Legislative Action
    Marketing To Mayberry
    MARL
    Missouri
    Mtstorm Doubs Rebuild
    Mtstormdoubs Rebuild
    New Jersey
    New Mexico
    Newslinks
    NIETC
    Opinion
    Path Alternatives
    Path Failures
    Path Intimidation Attempts
    Pay To Play
    Potomac Edison Investigation
    Power Company Propaganda
    Psc Failure
    Rates
    Regulatory Capture
    Skelly Fail
    The Pjm Cartel
    Top Ten Clean Line Mistakes
    Transource
    Washington
    West Virginia
    Wind Catcher
    Wisconsin

Copyright 2010 StopPATH WV, Inc.