StopPATH WV
  • News
  • StopPATH WV Blog
  • FAQ
  • Events
  • Fundraisers
  • Make a Donation
  • Landowner Resources
  • About PATH
  • Get Involved
  • Commercials
  • Links
  • About Us
  • Contact

WV PSC Punishes Customers With Rate Increase in FirstEnergy Billing & Meter Reading Investigation Order

5/28/2014

24 Comments

 
The West Virginia Public Service Commission finally issued an Order in its General Investigation of FirstEnergy subsidiaries Potomac Edison and Mon Power today.  The investigation was initiated a year ago at the urging of citizens' groups and legislators, and was to examine the billing, meter reading and customer service practices of Potomac Edison and Mon Power.

However, instead of punishing the company for its transgressions, the PSC has decided to punish the customers!

The PSC has ordered Potomac Edison and Mon Power to increase meter readings from bi-monthly to monthly no later than July 1, 2015.  However, the company's customers will pay for the cost of increasing the frequency of meter reading.  FirstEnergy has estimated that monthly reading would increase yearly costs by five million dollars ($5,000,000.00).  The PSC has directed the company to recover the increased cost from you by amending its recent request for a 15% rate increase to add the additional costs for monthly meter reading.  The PSC estimates that this will add another half a percent to the upcoming rate increase, to make the total rate increase more than 16%.
Converting from bimonthly to monthly meter reading in the territory of both FirstEnergy operating companies in West Virginia will require a transition period that allows FirstEnergy time to procure additional  equipment, hire and train new meter readers and make any necessary changes to its billing platform. Therefore, the Commission will require that FirstEnergy implement monthly meter reading as quickly as possible, and no later than July 1, 2015. The Commission will monitor the transition as part of the adjustment to its metrics discussed below. The Commission will be watching for continued improvement and consistent performance. The handling of current annual read customers will also be discussed in the relevant section below. FirstEnergy should file amendments to the tariffs of each West Virginia operating company that provide for monthly meter reading and billing for residential customers. Finally, FirstEnergy may request to amend its filings in the pending general rate proceeding and provide evidence of the reasonable increase in the estimated cost of service.
Over the year long course of this investigation, customers made many constructive and useful suggestions on how FirstEnergy could improve.  The Coalition for Reliable Power and the NAACP suggested that FirstEnergy (AT ITS OWN EXPENSE) be ordered to read meters every month for one full year in order to acquire accurate readings on which to base future estimated bills.  The West Virginia Consumer Advocate Division recommended that FirstEnergy be ordered to read meters monthly for one year without addressing who would pay for it.  The WV PSC staff recommended that FirstEnergy be ordered to read meters monthly only if other recommendations for improvement were not successful.

NOBODY RECOMMENDED THAT THE COMPANY BE ORDERED TO READ METERS MONTHLY, INDEFINITELY, AND AT THE CUSTOMERS' EXPENSE.

But the PSC batted aside every constructive suggestion, in addition to your calls that the company be punished for its willful violation of its tariff.  Instead, it rewarded FirstEnergy with another $5M rate increase!

The bi-monthly meter reading system of the former Allegheny Power worked fine for many years.  It was only AFTER Allegheny Power was acquired by Ohio utility holding company FirstEnergy that the problems started.  The PSC admits that the transition to FirstEnergy business practices, in addition to poor decision making, caused the problems.  The switch to monthly reading can therefore be easily tied to the ill-advised FirstEnergy merger.  The PSC and FirstEnergy promised us that customers wouldn't have to pay higher rates as a result of the merger.  Once again, the PSC has failed us.

To add insult to injury, the PSC and FirstEnergy are in cahoots to spin this as a victory for the customers in the press.  The PSC is crowing about how they have ordered FirstEnergy to read meters monthly, without mentioning who is going to pay for it.  You are!  They must really think you're stupid.  Don't fall for it!


West Virginia electric customers have now been punished for speaking out about the abuse heaped on them by Ohio-based FirstEnergy.  It's going to cost us at least $5M.

This is the clearest example of regulatory failure I've ever witnessed.
24 Comments
Don
5/28/2014 06:17:34 pm

Congratulations WVPSC. You have just failed in every measure of reasonable expectation to protect the consumer from First Energy's poor customer service, deaf ears to customer complaints and knowingly subjecting its customers to lies and half-truths in staffing and billing practices. It was bad enough that the company cut meter readers and blamed the weather for the company's poor decision making, but you have rewarded these knuckle-heads by making the customers give them yet more money to do what they should have done from the start - read the meters. This beautiful example of poor oversight and misplaced priorities makes me question the reason for your existence. Wow.

Reply
Dr. Luis Contreras link
5/29/2014 12:27:01 am


Why do we need “public” service commissions when they only work to protect investor-owned utilities? Rewarding lousy management and punishing ratepayers makes no sense at all.

The days of remote power generation as the only source of energy with expensive polluting power plants and incentives to build electric infrastructure are gone.

Onsite renewable power changes the rules of the game: we now have a choice to become power generators and stop being abused ratepayers.

With a 5.5 kW solar array, my electric bill last month was $0.00. For less than the price of a used truck, I have prepaid my electric bill for the next 50 years, with no maintenance.

There are many creative ways for community solar and wind power; it is up to ratepayers to take the power away from utilities and PSC’s.

For ideas, please visit our community website and leave a comment. Thanks!

www.LeanPower.org

Reply
Captain Trips
6/4/2014 01:15:59 am

Dr. Luis,

Please help me understand the process. So your e-bill last month was $0. Does that mean you took NO power from the grid? (If so, do you not use any power at night or on cloudy days or during polar vortices, or do you have battery storage?)

Or does that mean that you took power at night and sold power back during the day? If you sold power back then does that mean that you're selling power to others on the (evil) grid and you're counting on them to NOT solar-up as you did, otherwise there'd be no one to buy your power during the day?

As more and more people solar-up then the load served by utilities will decline, they will not have to generate as much and power prices should come down. So the benefits of selling power back will decline over time and it's the early adopters who benefit the most. Mr. Ponzi perfected this scheme.

So, you're benefiting financially from the existing grid at the expense of the poor folk who can't afford the solar panels on their vacation homes in Arkansas. This is similar to a "regressive tax".

Do you have solar panels on your Austin TX home? Or do you happily take electrons from the Sand Hill fossil fueled plant there, via the evil grid?

Don't get me wrong. I'm all for saving the planet, reducing harmfull emissions, renewable energy, energy efficiency, distributed generation and all that. But you need to remember that you NEED the grid if you want reliable, inexpensive power..."Por los demas, y para los demas, con hambre y sed de justicia."




Reply
Keryn
6/4/2014 05:02:56 am

Well, I gotta say, I agree with most of what you said, Cap'n. Any distributed generation connected to the grid must pay for the services they receive. But, the point of contention seems to be what is reasonable? Utilities that want to invent whopping renewable connection fees are being greedy. And net zero producers connected to the grid want to pay nothing for the service. Who's going to decide what's reasonable?

Reply
Captain Trips
6/4/2014 06:27:23 am

Wait, what? You agree with most....

Great question about who's going to decide what's reasonable. Clearly you don't trust the PSCs to do the right thing. And the utilities don't want to give away access to their customers - basically giving away their profits. And I doubt that they've factored in their cost savings by not having to build a new large generating unit in 5 or 10 years - replacing those coal units being shut down. Maybe YOU could do the math for us?

Luis Contreras link
6/5/2014 09:44:54 am

Hello, Cap'n

Glad to see someone read my comments and took the time to find out who I am and what I believe. I have no clue who you are, and that is OK.

Some people choose to buy a new truck. For half the price, I bought the best solar system I could find, to pre-pay my electric bill for the next 50 years, with no maintenance. Unlike SWEPCO I did not have to use eminent domain, cut down acres of trees or condemn my neighbor’s property.

My total bill was not $0.00; I paid the “service availability fee” everyone pays, every month, for the use of the grid. I am not getting a free ride at all. Read your electric bill and you will find it. It is a fixed fee, just to be connected.

I can tell from your questions you know how net-metering works. In Arkansas, Carroll Electric Cooperative Corp. sells the extra electrons I make to my neighbors at a profit. CECC loves my solar system and would like me to install more panels.

We, the ratepayers, have paid for the grid, and will keep paying for all the overhead. The grid is a mess that grew up one line at a time, as if designed by drunken sailors. It was needed in the 70’s when there were no onsite generation alternatives.

The grid is not reliable at all; that is why I have a back up generator. We do no need more transmission lines and no more coal by wire.

Reply
Keryn
6/4/2014 08:18:58 am

What, am I supposed to be unreasonable? I try to be quite reasonable, and some of the arguments I've been presented with that net zero DG shouldn't pay for their use of the grid (and once the person didn't even want to pay for their service drop, meter or billing) are just illogical. No, I have quite enough math on my plate for the time being, but I wish there was a way to fairly solve this dilemma before the factions get even more entrenched.

Reply
Keryn
6/4/2014 09:00:26 am

But, just to make this a little less weird for you, Cap'n., I will let you know what parts of your comment I don't agree with (feel better now?) I'm not a fan of the "poor people" regressive tax argument. I don't think that's going to be helpful in the long run. It's nothing but an attempt by the power companies to foment class warfare and distract folks from the real greedmeister.

I also think it's high time that the utilities deal with the reality of DG in their long-range planning, instead of running full steam ahead toward building more centralized generation and transmission. Perhaps if the utilities took that first step and approached the problem honestly... oh hell, what am I saying? Silly me!

Reply
Captain T
6/4/2014 11:00:56 pm

Well, I can assure you that at least one large utility is dialing in a variety of national and regional DG scenarios in their IRP.

Reply
Keryn
6/5/2014 03:34:58 am

That's great, Capt! Where can I read more (and write about it?)

Reply
FOPW
6/5/2014 06:00:01 am

See your 2/23/2014 blog post and look for updates in the coming months.

Patience
6/6/2014 12:08:40 am

FOPW, huh? I think I figured it out, but can you give me some hints as to who the "F" you are...?

Keryn
6/6/2014 01:14:15 am

Well, an "F" is better than an "E" We make great "F"s because nobody in their right mind wants to be our "E."

Captain T
6/12/2014 04:44:19 am

Re: Distributed Gen Developing Story...

http://www.tva.gov/dgiv/

Keryn
6/12/2014 05:31:16 am

Sweet! Thanks, Capt.

Hansel
6/5/2014 07:28:12 am

Gretel and I have followed the trail of bread crumbs to the candy house in the forest! This is a fun game!

Reply
Dr. Luis Contreras link
6/6/2014 12:33:14 am

Cap’n

I should have replied before, my apology. I missed all the fun.

Rats, you just gave me a reason to add a few more panels. Some months are cloudy and I end up paying for coal electrons.

Unlike 40 year projects, I can add one panel at a time; the cost of the panels is dropping like a rock.

No need to reply Cap'n

Reply
Captain Trips
6/6/2014 06:39:37 am

Dr. Luis,

Dang it. I tried to be like Keryn and throw out some inflamatory commentary to try to get a rise out of you, but you turned out to be very level headed, calm, calculating, reasonable. In other words, you're no fun.

p.s. Where can I get me some of them thar rock bottom priced panels?

p.p.s. Have you seen the EPRI report: "The Integrated Grid - Realizing the full value of central and distributed energy resources"? In it is a discussion of the problems that Germany had when they greatly increased their solar and wind - doubling of electricity rates, grid instability, etc.

Reply
Dr. Luis Contreras link
6/10/2014 01:18:45 am

Dear Cap'n

Did you know EPRI is the "research" arm of the Edison Electric Institute, a lobby group for all investor-owned US utilities? Of course, good old Tom was 6 feet under when EEI was created and gets no royalties for the use of his name.

EEI and the Tobacco funded research is suspect

Reply
Keryn
6/6/2014 08:32:18 am

Now, now, Captain, was that nice? Are you trying to fit yourself into the "E" category, just to see what happens? You're going to have to try a lot harder than that. I like you!

Reply
Captain Herbert Trips
6/7/2014 04:14:45 am

Multiple choice reply:

A. Well, gosh. I like you too!

B. heh, heh, well, what are you wearing?

C. I just like to play devil's advocate to keep a little balance to the discussions when I see an opportunity.

D. All of the above.



Reply
Patience
6/7/2014 05:06:14 am

Aha! Herbert, is that you?? I know I kept getting you confused with all of my other husbands, but we did have a golden afternoon together on stage one day ...

Reply
mike the poor man link
6/9/2014 01:09:51 pm

so, i should believe in the PSC? tell me why!

Reply
Keryn
6/10/2014 03:10:44 am

??? I advise that you shouldn't. Avoid disappointment.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    About the Author

    Keryn Newman blogs here at StopPATH WV about energy issues, transmission policy, misguided regulation, our greedy energy companies and their corporate spin.
    In 2008, AEP & Allegheny Energy's PATH joint venture used their transmission line routing etch-a-sketch to draw a 765kV line across the street from her house. Oooops! And the rest is history.

    About
    StopPATH Blog

    StopPATH Blog began as a forum for information and opinion about the PATH transmission project.  The PATH project was abandoned in 2012, however, this blog was not.

    StopPATH Blog continues to bring you energy policy news and opinion from a consumer's point of view.  If it's sometimes snarky and oftentimes irreverent, just remember that the truth isn't pretty.  People come here because they want the truth, instead of the usual dreadful lies this industry continues to tell itself.  If you keep reading, I'll keep writing.


    Need help opposing unneeded transmission?
    Email me


    Search This Site

    Got something to say?  Submit your own opinion for publication.

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010

    Categories

    All
    $$$$$$
    2023 PJM Transmission
    Aep Vs Firstenergy
    Arkansas
    Best Practices
    Best Practices
    Big Winds Big Lie
    Can Of Worms
    Carolinas
    Citizen Action
    Colorado
    Corporate Propaganda
    Data Centers
    Democracy Failures
    DOE Failure
    Emf
    Eminent Domain
    Events
    Ferc Action
    FERC Incentives Part Deux
    Ferc Transmission Noi
    Firstenergy Failure
    Good Ideas
    Illinois
    Iowa
    Kansas
    Land Agents
    Legislative Action
    Marketing To Mayberry
    MARL
    Missouri
    Mtstorm Doubs Rebuild
    Mtstormdoubs Rebuild
    New Jersey
    New Mexico
    Newslinks
    NIETC
    Opinion
    Path Alternatives
    Path Failures
    Path Intimidation Attempts
    Pay To Play
    Potomac Edison Investigation
    Power Company Propaganda
    Psc Failure
    Rates
    Regulatory Capture
    Skelly Fail
    The Pjm Cartel
    Top Ten Clean Line Mistakes
    Transource
    Valley Link Transmission
    Washington
    West Virginia
    Wind Catcher
    Wisconsin

Copyright 2010 StopPATH WV, Inc.