StopPATH WV
  • News
  • StopPATH WV Blog
  • FAQ
  • Events
  • Fundraisers
  • Make a Donation
  • Landowner Resources
  • About PATH
  • Get Involved
  • Commercials
  • Links
  • About Us
  • Contact

Transmission Line "Open Houses" Cause Project Opposition Infernos

7/22/2016

2 Comments

 
The transmission project "Open House" is a public relations ploy designed to indoctrinate an unsuspecting public with transmission company talking points while simultaneously dividing and conquering a community.

This tactic is so old, I don't even know (or much care) where it originated.  All that matters is that it has become an industry "best practice" that needs serious reform.  Transmission companies who utilize "Open House" format are doing nothing but shooting themselves in the foot right out of the starting gate.

The idea behind presenting a project to a community via an "Open House" format is to neutralize the combined energy of an angry crowd, such as would occur if the company presented its project to all attendees at the same time in a town hall format.  By keeping attendees separate, the company believes it is keeping the public from sharing information and validating their ideas with others who share the same unfavorable opinion about the information presented.  An assembled crowd listening to the same information from one speaker would feed off the energy of just a few naysayers until everyone is on the same opposition bandwagon.

But "Open House" meetings simply delay the inevitable.  Unless companies meet with community residents separately, multiple attendees will talk with each other and share opinions.  People band together at times of crisis, and transmission company "Open Houses" are a fertile enabler of impromptu discussions and exchanges of information by community members.  The commiseration of strangers will spill out of the "Open House" venue and continue long after the transmission company employees take off their little name tags and pack up their display posters.  The transmission company "Open House" is the birthplace of transmission project opposition groups.

In the past, each community opposition group had to reinvent the wheel and it took them longer to cause transmission project approval headaches.  Today however, the internet exponentially expands quick access to resources and information used to spray gasoline on an opposition bonfire while anger is fresh.  It's an opposition inferno!

Is there a way to change that outcome?  Sure.  But it's not about meeting format.  It's about how company information is presented.  Current "best practice" intends to lead attendees through a maze of "information stations" where company representatives explain electric energy, environmental protection, the transmission grid, transmission grid planning, need for new transmission lines, and the appearance and function of new lines.  Then the attendee is dumped out into an "information station" where they can look at maps to find out how close their property is to the proposed transmission line.  That's all the attendee cares about, everything else learned at the early stations is completely forgotten when they come to the realization that the project is going to directly affect them.  Then the transmission company hands them a "comment card" and the idea that their opinion matters in the ultimate transmission route.  Attendees are conditioned to frame their comment around pushing the line off their own property and onto that of their neighbor.  That only works for a few minutes while the attendee is earnestly at work trying to avoid the transmission line.  Comment card deposited, the attendee leaves the venue, where others have gathered on sidewalks and in parking lots to discuss the project and resolve to fight it.  Opposition is born.

I came across a news photo recently depicting a transmission company employee talking to attendees at a Southern Cross transmission project "Open House."  It's classic.  Every news story about a transmission line "Open House" includes the obligatory photo of attendees speaking with company employees.  I've seen this photo thousands of times, only the faces change.

Look at this photo.  The body language tells the story.
Nervous transmission company employee tries to explain himself to angry attendees.  Look at the three attendees.  Two have their arms folded across their chest.  That's a defensive posture that indicates they clearly aren't even listening to transmission guy any longer and certainly are long past being receptive to his information.  The attendee in the middle has his hands firmly planted in his pockets, which is also a semi-defensive move that signals insecurity, mistrust and a reluctance to listen.  All three attendees have the same expression on their face.  It's the expression of someone who clearly doesn't believe the person speaking.  You can bet that those three will be talking with each other as soon as transmission guy moves away to talk with other attendees.

But wait... is transmission guy also in the process of shoving his hands in his pockets?  Ahh... insecurity!  And why not?  Who wouldn't be insecure facing down these three?

So, what's the problem?  Transmission guy is presenting them with a fait accompli.  He (and his company and possibly a regional transmission organization) have already made the decision to build a transmission project.  Now, maybe the project is a necessary response to a problem that must be solved.  But nobody likes hearing the solution to a problem, without first considering the problem.

A better approach is not to attempt behavior control of a community to go along with a pre-determined solution, but to involve the community in crafting the solution to a problem that affects them.  Presenting the problem to the community and soliciting possible solutions within a range of possibilities, and being open to new possibilities, creates a whole different dynamic.  It causes attendees to listen to the problem, the possible solutions, and to become involved in solving the problem.  When communities are involved in crafting the solution, they cooperatively "buy in" to the ultimate solution.  Now the solution may not be the company's desired transmission project, so the company needs to demonstrate flexibility in the selected solution.  As long as it gets the job done, right?

But wait... a solution that's not the company's solution might not make the most money for the company.  Look at yourselves, transmission companies, you want to be public utilities, but yet you believe that also gives you the right to make the most money possible from the public you serve.  It doesn't.

Stasis or momentum?  The choice is yours!
2 Comments
Eric Morris
7/23/2016 12:16:54 pm

Yikes. Speak about transmission opposition inferno. The gathering was people complaining about a transmission project being shoved on them.

http://news.antiwar.com/2016/07/23/isis-attack-on-afghan-shiite-protest-kills-80-wounds-231/

Reply
Eric Morris
7/23/2016 12:19:25 pm

Whoops. They want the power--in rich countries the cronies shove unneeded stuff, in less developed ones the powers-that-be horde for themselves, I guess.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    About the Author

    Keryn Newman blogs here at StopPATH WV about energy issues, transmission policy, misguided regulation, our greedy energy companies and their corporate spin.
    In 2008, AEP & Allegheny Energy's PATH joint venture used their transmission line routing etch-a-sketch to draw a 765kV line across the street from her house. Oooops! And the rest is history.

    About
    StopPATH Blog

    StopPATH Blog began as a forum for information and opinion about the PATH transmission project.  The PATH project was abandoned in 2012, however, this blog was not.

    StopPATH Blog continues to bring you energy policy news and opinion from a consumer's point of view.  If it's sometimes snarky and oftentimes irreverent, just remember that the truth isn't pretty.  People come here because they want the truth, instead of the usual dreadful lies this industry continues to tell itself.  If you keep reading, I'll keep writing.


    Need help opposing unneeded transmission?
    Email me


    Search This Site

    Got something to say?  Submit your own opinion for publication.

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010

    Categories

    All
    $$$$$$
    2023 PJM Transmission
    Aep Vs Firstenergy
    Arkansas
    Best Practices
    Best Practices
    Big Winds Big Lie
    Can Of Worms
    Carolinas
    Citizen Action
    Colorado
    Corporate Propaganda
    Data Centers
    Democracy Failures
    DOE Failure
    Emf
    Eminent Domain
    Events
    Ferc Action
    FERC Incentives Part Deux
    Ferc Transmission Noi
    Firstenergy Failure
    Good Ideas
    Illinois
    Iowa
    Kansas
    Land Agents
    Legislative Action
    Marketing To Mayberry
    MARL
    Missouri
    Mtstorm Doubs Rebuild
    Mtstormdoubs Rebuild
    New Jersey
    New Mexico
    Newslinks
    NIETC
    Opinion
    Path Alternatives
    Path Failures
    Path Intimidation Attempts
    Pay To Play
    Potomac Edison Investigation
    Power Company Propaganda
    Psc Failure
    Rates
    Regulatory Capture
    Skelly Fail
    The Pjm Cartel
    Top Ten Clean Line Mistakes
    Transource
    Washington
    West Virginia
    Wind Catcher
    Wisconsin

Copyright 2010 StopPATH WV, Inc.