StopPATH WV
  • News
  • StopPATH WV Blog
  • FAQ
  • Events
  • Fundraisers
  • Make a Donation
  • Landowner Resources
  • About PATH
  • Get Involved
  • Commercials
  • Links
  • About Us
  • Contact

The Naysayers and The Suspicious

3/13/2019

0 Comments

 
Over the years I've read one glowing blog after another, penned by environmental groups and "clean energy" focused pubs, singing the praises of the doomed Clean Line projects.  Incumbent utilities, the fossil fuel industry, and mysterious "dark money" providers were blamed for getting in the way of "clean energy."  Resistant landowners also took a clobbering, for being so "selfish" to not volunteer their land and desire to farm around new transmission lines.  It was always someone else's fault that Clean Line was failing.  But the song was always the same... we need big new transmission lines "for wind" in order to save the planet.

Recently, Clean Line has announced its ultimate failure (although it's actually been failing for years).  The Clean Line projects are history.  This fact seems to be just barely settling in when along comes another long-distance direct current transmission proposal, SOO Green Renewable Rail.  You'd think these transmission ("for wind") lovers would be over the moon.

But they're not, if this article is any indication.  While describing the project adequately, the author throws in certain unnecessary barbs that try to doom the project before it even gets started.  Here's an example:
SOO Green could set a new paradigm for how to win approval for clean energy wires infrastructure...
Yay! Positive encouragement for a better future!  Except that is followed by this:
...if it doesn't end up as another warning sign of how hard it can be.
Was that really necessary?  I mean you all have been so busy heaping glowing compliments upon Clean Line, without those kind of barbs, and now when a project that could actually get done is on the horizon, you're a pessimistic Doubting Thomas.

Oh, so it's just one sorta off article, right?  But then the armchair climate change warriors who spend way too much time reading and commenting on the ridiculous articles in this pub start up (and it's the same bunch every time).  First they start talking about eminent domain and how good it is, how right, how just.  A project that doesn't use eminent domain just can't be good.  Then they start complaining about how expensive a buried project can be.  We desperately need new transmission "for wind," but it has to be constructed the cheapest way possible, even if it poses a burden on landowners and gets held up and eventually cancelled by overwhelming community opposition?  Is this really about "clean energy" at this point, or is it more about being "right" and powerful in an online forum and stomping on people you just don't like?  You know what they say about people who spend inordinate amounts of time in online communities...

And now let's move onto the suspicious.  Just about every single article about SOO Green Renewable Rail out of Iowa and Illinois mentioned the Rock Island Clean Line and its failure.  The comparison, as inapt as it truly is, gets made for the reader.  Considering the overwhelming opposition in these states that killed RICL dead, dead, deader than dead, how can these folks help but be suspicious of SOO Green?  Some grabbed their torches and pitchforks and issued the battle cry, but aren't quite sure where the battle ground is.

If it's just like RICL, contentious permitting processes at state regulatory boards are on the horizon, and affected landowners want to participate.  Except those processes won't happen.  No eminent domain.  Let's repeat that... NO EMINENT DOMAIN.  Construction on existing rail rights of way.  No private land may be taken against the owner's will.  If the project isn't harming anyone's property, what case would they make against it?  One person stated that there is no "need" for such a project.  I'm pretty sure "need" isn't a factor here.  As a merchant transmission owner, the only examination of "need" comes from customers.  If customers sign contracts to buy service, then it's "needed."  Why would any state regulator need to examine "need" if jurisdictional ratepayers aren't paying for it, and there is no request for eminent domain authority?  I just can't see any logical case against SOO Green, except that folks don't like transmission and think there are other solutions.  I tend to agree with them, for the most part, but if a transmission project that doesn't demand any sacrifice of others gets built underground on existing rights of way, won't that become a feather in the cap of transmission opponents on future overhead, eminent domain, projects?  If SOO Green proves that transmission really can be constructed underground on existing rights of way, what is the excuse for any future project that wants to do it the old fashioned way?

And I suppose it doesn't help that many of the Midwestern news articles were packed with the same old, tired Clean Line glitter, such as overinflated promises of jobs (600!), generalities about how "hungry" the east coast is for power (hint:  it's not, it's doing just fine building its own renewables, such as offshore wind), and overblown claims about how SOO Green is "for wind."  The suspicious have heard all this dreck before, and they didn't believe it the first time.  Recycling Clean Line talking points bolsters the comparison to Clean Line and can only make things harder down the road.  Let's hope SOO Green can just be itself -- a revolutionary idea that can change the way transmission is built in this country.  Applying a tired transmission line narrative to a fresh new idea is sort of disappointing, and it's fueling existing suspicion.

Perhaps it was too much too soon for many of the naysayers and the suspicious.  Maybe they just need a little time to noodle it out.  SOO Green has a hard road ahead convincing these folks that they don't have ulterior motives, and that they can get the job done.  I'm willing to give SOO Green a chance, how about you?
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    About the Author

    Keryn Newman blogs here at StopPATH WV about energy issues, transmission policy, misguided regulation, our greedy energy companies and their corporate spin.
    In 2008, AEP & Allegheny Energy's PATH joint venture used their transmission line routing etch-a-sketch to draw a 765kV line across the street from her house. Oooops! And the rest is history.

    About
    StopPATH Blog

    StopPATH Blog began as a forum for information and opinion about the PATH transmission project.  The PATH project was abandoned in 2012, however, this blog was not.

    StopPATH Blog continues to bring you energy policy news and opinion from a consumer's point of view.  If it's sometimes snarky and oftentimes irreverent, just remember that the truth isn't pretty.  People come here because they want the truth, instead of the usual dreadful lies this industry continues to tell itself.  If you keep reading, I'll keep writing.


    Need help opposing unneeded transmission?
    Email me


    Search This Site

    Got something to say?  Submit your own opinion for publication.

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010

    Categories

    All
    $$$$$$
    2023 PJM Transmission
    Aep Vs Firstenergy
    Arkansas
    Best Practices
    Best Practices
    Big Winds Big Lie
    Can Of Worms
    Carolinas
    Citizen Action
    Colorado
    Corporate Propaganda
    Data Centers
    Democracy Failures
    DOE Failure
    Emf
    Eminent Domain
    Events
    Ferc Action
    FERC Incentives Part Deux
    Ferc Transmission Noi
    Firstenergy Failure
    Good Ideas
    Illinois
    Iowa
    Kansas
    Land Agents
    Legislative Action
    Marketing To Mayberry
    MARL
    Missouri
    Mtstorm Doubs Rebuild
    Mtstormdoubs Rebuild
    New Jersey
    New Mexico
    Newslinks
    NIETC
    Opinion
    Path Alternatives
    Path Failures
    Path Intimidation Attempts
    Pay To Play
    Potomac Edison Investigation
    Power Company Propaganda
    Psc Failure
    Rates
    Regulatory Capture
    Skelly Fail
    The Pjm Cartel
    Top Ten Clean Line Mistakes
    Transource
    Valley Link Transmission
    Washington
    West Virginia
    Wind Catcher
    Wisconsin

Copyright 2010 StopPATH WV, Inc.