StopPATH WV
  • News
  • StopPATH WV Blog
  • FAQ
  • Events
  • Fundraisers
  • Make a Donation
  • Landowner Resources
  • About PATH
  • Get Involved
  • Commercials
  • Links
  • About Us
  • Contact

Globalism and Electricity:  Taking Over the World

6/9/2021

3 Comments

 
Ever since President Xi Jinping pitched the idea of a “global energy internet” to the United Nations six years ago, China’s been trying to persuade the world to build the high voltage highways that would form its backbone. That plan to wrap the planet in a web of intercontinental, made-in-Beijing power lines has gone pretty much nowhere. Yet the fortunes of so-called supergrids appear to be turning, if not on quite the spectacular, Bond-villain scale Xi first envisaged.
What could go wrong?  What could go wrong with a global electric grid powered by unreliable wind and solar electricity?  What are the chances that some country that's still building fossil fuel generators would jack up the global grid and then disconnect itself and rely on its alternative resources to take over a paralyzed, powerless world?
This is absolute madness being pushed by an increasingly bold mainstream media owned by the elite with a global agenda.  It's the elite, rich and powerful, vs. the rest of us.  The Have-Way-Too-Much vs. the Have-Nots.

Take a look at this proposed map of the new global grid.
Picture
Let's focus in on the U.S.:
Picture
In addition to the green and blue lines, there's also a network of black and red lines across the continental U.S.  What are those?
Picture
How close does that come to this?
Picture
That's a map of a proposed "overlay" high voltage transmission grid that's been bumping along unbuilt for years.  First it was for coal, now it's for renewables.

It also looks a lot like this more recent version used by "Breakthrough Energy's" front groups, ACORE and ACEG, to illustrate their "Macrogrid Initiative."
Picture
What's The Macrogrid Initiative?  It's a group of global elite billionaires who want to invest in a new electric transmission "overlay" grid.  These billionaires think they know more about the power grid than professionals.  It includes characters such as Bill Gates, Michael Bloomberg,* Jeff Bezos, a couple of Chinese Billionaires, and a selected elite from around the globe.

Ya know, they say New World Order is a conspiracy theory, just like a lot of things poo-poo'd by the media lately as conspiracy theories that later turned out to be true.  The media merely covered them up because they didn't fit the desired narrative.  Ditto with believing that The Great Reset is an elite takeover.  But if you google Bill Gates + either of these "conspiracies" there's plenty to read that doesn't sound quite as crackpot as it used to.

What are the chances that the Chinese independently came up with a macrogrid idea at the same time as Bill Gates?  That making electricity bigger and costlier and centrally controlled isn't a plan to take over the world like Dr. Evil?  What's the one thing in the world our society can't do without?  Electricity.

Why is our Big Government so obsessed with centralized renewables and Big Transmission?  Why is democratic energy, such as microgrids, home generators, and distributed generation being squashed?  We could sit here all day and ask these rhetorical questions.  Is there really no such thing as coincidence?
*Must be a real coincidence that this crazy story about a global power grid was published by Bloomberg, right?
3 Comments

Illinois Legislature To Vote On Energy Bill Next Tuesday

6/9/2021

1 Comment

 
This story says the Illinois legislature will be called back into session for one day next Tuesday, June 15.  There are a couple better stories about it, but they're behind paywalls so we won't provide links.  One blathered on about how they think they have enough votes in the Senate to pass the bill, however, that appears maybe sort of iffy.

Your mission... peel away at least one state Senator.  Here's a list.  Of course, the Senator doesn't have to vote against the energy bill, s/he just needs to remove the language that changes the definition of "public utility".  It should be really easy for the Senator to find just by searching the document for the words "public utility," and even easier for the Senator to amend the bill to remove it before the vote on Tuesday.

Would the Illinois senate hold up this important energy bill to argue over whether Invenergy should be a public utility?  Or will they throw Invenergy under the bus in order to pass this legislation that fixes other more important energy issues?  Invenergy is an opportunistic parasite that has attached itself to fast moving and popular legislation in order to increase its corporate profits.  Invenergy is not worth the sacrifice.

Here's a little background music to play while you work.
1 Comment

Invenergy Wants To Change Illinois Law To Give Grain Belt Express Eminent Domain

6/5/2021

3 Comments

 
Picture
Was it just last month that Invenergy told the Missouri legislature that it wasn't fair to change state law if it hurt their project?  Well, guess what?  Invenergy is busy trying to change state law in Illinois to help Grain Belt Express by allowing it to become a public utility so it may use eminent domain to site the project across Illinois.  Hypocrisy at its finest!

As many of you may remember, the Illinois courts vacated Grain Belt's permit (and eminent domain authority) several years ago because Grain Belt Express did not own any utility property in the state.  Because it did not own utility property, it was not a public utility, and because it wasn't a public utility it was not allowed to use eminent domain to acquire easements across private property.  Clean Line was unsuccessful in overturning this decision. 

However, Invenergy is attempting to change the law upon which the court's decision was based.  As part of an extensive new energy bill in Illinois, the following language changes have been proposed to the statute.
Picture
By changing the definition of public utility, Invenergy could be be a public utility now, if it only intends to own property later.  It merely has to apply at the ICC and receive a permit.  Our private property rights are under attack all across the Midwest by greedy merchant transmission developers who want to use your private property to make money on speculative renewable energy projects.

Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker says utilities did not write this energy bill.
Pritzker, who vowed in the wake of the ComEd scandal that utilities and energy companies would no longer write the state’s energy policy, declined to comment on the specifics of his offer, saying that negotiators were “still working on the bill.”

“Utilities did not write the bill that we have worked on. That is clear,” Pritzker said. “We have done everything that we can to stand up for clean energy principles, to make sure that we’re expanding renewables in the state. I have set out the principles, I have stuck to those principles, and so my hope is that we’ll end up with a good energy bill.”

So, we're supposed to believe that Invenergy did not have its thumb on this rather opportune language change?  Illinois is still reeling from a recent utility scandal where ComEd exerted undue influence on the state legislature.  It sure looks to me like Illinois has simply traded one utility master for another.  Instead of the legislature being under ComEd's thumb, now it's under Invenergy's thumb.
Something sure stinks in Springfield!

Invenergy wants to take the most profitable route for GBE, and that's using eminent domain to take private property across three states.  It doesn't want to fairly negotiate with landowners without the sledgehammer of eminent domain.  Here's another news flash:  eminent domain is not necessary to build merchant transmission!  When eminent domain for overhead merchant transmission was outlawed in Iowa several years ago, a better project emerged.  SOO Green Renewable Rail is developing a merchant transmission project buried its entire length on existing railroad rights of way.  No eminent domain!  No changing state law, no sacrifice from landowners.  It's a complete no-brainer!  Maybe Invenergy should make a better project instead of using its influence to manipulate state law for its own benefit?

Fortunately, the Illinois energy bill did not pass before the legislative session ended, however, there's talk that it may come to a vote in a few days, or maybe this month, or next month, nobody is really sure and reports change day by day.  If it does come to a vote, the public utility definition change needs to be stripped out.  Let Illinois legislators know!

Does Invenergy's legislative hypocrisy stick in your craw?  Want to do something about it?  Well, you can!  It's quick and easy, and probably extremely satisfying as well!  You don't have to be an Illinois resident to contact Illinois legislators.  The bigger the voice, the more impact it has! For complete instructions on who to call or write, visit BlockRICL or send an email to [email protected].
3 Comments

PJM Calls Pennsylvania PUC Denial of Transource Project A Siting Delay

6/3/2021

1 Comment

 
PJM's first Transmission Expansion Advisory Committee meeting since its ordered Transource Independence Energy Connection project was denied by the PA PUC veers off into the ridiculous.

While meeting materials show that PJM will engage in studies to see if any issues are created by removing the IEC from PJM's plan, PJM is wearing blinders on its journey there.
Picture
It seems IEC's construction schedule is being impacted due to the siting process.  I guess you could put it that way, since a denial by the PUC would prevent the project from being sited.... ever!  But never fear, a denial is only a "delay to the projected completion" in PJM's dream world.  They act like the PUC is going to change its mind somewhere down the road.  Of course, that is unlikely to happen.  But PJM wants to pretend it can happen.

PJM just cannot admit that the IEC project was a mistake from the very beginning.  PJM cannot admit that it made a mistake when it endlessly propped up the IEC project in the face of mounting evidence that it was too costly and wasn't needed.  PJM can never admit that its planning is fallible.

Here's PJM riding along on its bike of "need" for the IEC... until it hits the PA PUC speed bump.

PJM meant to do that.

Sure it did!
1 Comment

Macropropaganda

6/1/2021

1 Comment

 
Picture
It's a new word for the bloviating nonsense spewed by Bill Gates' Macrogrid Initiative.

Bill Gates became rich selling crappy computer technology that enslaved the vast majority.  Now he thinks he's an expert on absolutely everything and dreams of taking over the world and remaking it to his own liking.  Money doesn't equal intelligence.  The only ones buying his schtick are the ones Bill is buying to carry it out.  The ordinary man is not impressed.  In fact, the ordinary man is positively revolted by the rich and powerful dictating every aspect of his life and finances.  The ordinary man will dig in his heels and oppose Bill's brain farts simply on general principles.  Bill's energy vision is no different.

Bill gathered all the best dreamers and schemers he could buy to sell his vision of top down big energy to the new Big Government bureaucrats hungry for power and prestige.  Obviously Bill isn't interested in selling his plan to the masses.  Perhaps he thinks that his Big Government can be used to stomp on the masses and drag them into an increasingly expensive and unreliable energy future controlled by the global elite?

Sorry, we're not on board.  In fact, we're going to fight, kick and scream the whole way.  And we're going to keep speaking truth to power until we get our way.

Big Government agency U.S. Department of Energy held a "summit" last week under the auspices of its ARPA-E program.  There, our Big Government "partnered" with Big Transmission and its bastard child "The Macrogrid Initiative" to tell us what we need "as a society."

The four words no for-profit industry should ever utter:
WE AS A SOCIETY
You're not part of our "society."  You have your own "society" of filthy rich folks who want to use us as a stepping stone to even more riches.  Any elite blowhard who utters these words is displaying his own arrogance.  It is SOCIETY that decides what we need "as a society," not elite dictators.  Saying these words guarantees that society will fight you tooth and nail.

And that's exactly what's going to happen to Bill's Macrogrid Initiative.  Having a dream to build a gigantic, new electric grid is one thing; getting there is another.  There's a fork in the road, and Bill and his cabal have veered off onto the wrong path.

Two options:

1.  Innovate new energy solutions that would be accepted by society.

2.  Use old energy solutions that are highly profitable and attempt to force them on society.

One path requires more money upfront but guarantees smooth sailing on the back end.  The other requires no effort in the beginning, but will flounder endlessly when rejected by society.  You'd think Bill would be smart enough to know the difference, but perhaps his arrogance gets in the way?

The only way we as a society are going to allow an energy transition is if it does not impact the sanctity of our homes and empty our wallets.  Otherwise, get ready for eternal, entrenched opposition from society.  We're not docile sheep, in fact you're probably going to be surprised by the virulence we can muster when threatened.
The panelists agreed that regulatory entities will need to alter their policies to accelerate transmission projects and facilitate their interconnection to the grid.
Alter regulation to increase your profits and decrease society's rights?  I don't think so.  In fact, you might even get surprised by some regulatory virulence if you keep trying to stuff your arrogant ideas down that pipe.

Regulation is for benefit of society.  It's not for the purpose of increasing utility power and profits.  Regulators serve ME, not YOU.  We as a society have created a regulatory paradigm that cannot be dismantled or it will cease to exist and become nothing more than a political-corporate dictatorship that does not protect consumers.  Regulation was formed to protect consumers from corporations, not the other way around.  Are we going to need regulators to protect us from the regulators?  Or are we going to need a revolution?

It's not that great a stretch these days for the people to disconnect from the bloated energy bureaucracy and make their own energy.  What good is a kingdom with no subjects?

Game on, Bill!
Picture
1 Comment

Becoming Transmission Woke

6/1/2021

0 Comments

 
In a recent article in NPR, a spokeswoman for Cardinal Hickory Creek transmission line accuses the Environmental Law and Policy Center of being "contradictory."  Strip away all the weasel words and she says that they're hypocrites.  If the ELPC supports "clean energy" it must also support Big Transmission.

After years of supporting Big Transmission like Clean Line Energy Partners, ELPC got transmission woke when a Big Transmission project "for renewables" got sited in its own backyard.  This is undeniable reality:  People don't like renewables when infrastructure to support it gets sited in their own backyard.

ELPC's wokeism spurred an organizational change to supporting "no wires alternatives", such as advanced transmission technology that makes better use of existing transmission.  ELPC still supports "clean energy", but it does so while recognizing the environmental damage caused by Big Transmission.  Is this hypocrisy?  Or the beginning of a sensible new trend where big green becomes transmission woke?

Big Transmission as the solution to "climate change" is headed towards oblivion.  The more gigantic projects they dream up, the better the odds that one of them will get dangerously close to the places environmental groups hold dear.  Already, having an environmental hypocrite like ELPC in their nest is causing great concern.  The wokeism is only going to spread, because once you get transmission woke, there's simply no going back.  Landowners will NEVER change their minds and welcome new overhead transmission for renewables.  No matter what the transmission profiteers propose, and no matter how much OPM* (Other People's Money) they spend "incentivizing"** transmission, they are simply spinning their wheels.  Opposition will continue, and increase, including opposition from environmental groups.

NPR says that Cardinal Hickory Creek is in trouble, and the trouble is coming from ELPC, the only party with the resources to drag it through the courts.  Bravo!  However, it also demonstrates one of the foundational tenets of transmission opposition, "the enemy of my enemy is my friend."  For years, big green fought against transmission when they thought it was "for coal."  Now that it's supposed to be "for renewables", big green loves transmission.  Is this hypocritical?  You bet'cha!  ELPC demonstrates that it isn't about transmission at all, but about environmentalism.  Isn't it time that big green goes back to its roots and stops being a well-funded patsy for an increasingly greedy energy industry?  See tenet above.  A landowner is likely to get whiplash from the changing transmission policies of big green.

Environmental groups in New England are at war against each other over the Big Transmission project New England Clean Energy Connect.   ELPC is not alone, the wokeism is blossoming, along with the finger pointing and claims of hypocrisy.

Why does this swirling sea of transmission frenemies matter?  Because it further degrades the pedestal of moral superiority to which Big Transmission has ascended by making it murkier and less trusted.  Landowners have long been suspicious of the regulatory process that approves or denies Big Transmission.  Is it really about transmission being needed, or is it simply about buying influence and political support?

A Wisconsin judge summed it up recently when ruling on a claim of bias by the state PSC in the Cardinal Hickory Creek approval:
“(I)t is essential to our democratic system, to our design of government, that we maintain the process as fair in appearance and in practice,” Frost wrote. “At least then the disappointment of the losing party is in having lost, not in being cheated by an unfair process or decision maker. Disappointment is acceptable. Distrust is dangerous.”
Wise words that should be applied universally these days.  We all know what you're doing behind closed doors and we simply don't trust you.
*Financial incentives, loan guarantees, and tax credits paid for by taxpayers.
**This is not a word.  Incentive is a noun, not a verb. 

0 Comments

Welcome To The Brave New World of Unreliable Renewables

5/28/2021

1 Comment

 
Picture
The North American Electric Reliability Corporation recently released its 2021 Summer Reliability Assessment.

Two words:  Buy candles.

NERC sees possible problems ahead in California and Texas.  Coincidentally, these regions have built a lot of renewables, which causes "more expensive" fossil fuel generators to close.

About California:
WECC-California is at risk of energy emergencies during periods of normal peak summer demand and high risk when above-normal demand is widespread in the west. Prior to summer, the planning reserve margin (which is based on existing and firm capacity) for the California-Mexico assessment area was below the 18.4% Reference Margin Level that WECC calculates is needed for maintaining loss-of-load risk below a 1-day-in-10-year benchmark (a 400 MW shortfall at peak demand). Probabilistic studies indicate 10,185 MWh of energy in the area is expected to go unserved this summer. Over 3 GW of additional resources are expected for this summer with most coming in the form of new solar photovoltaic (PV) generation. These generation plants can provide energy to support peak demand; however, solar PV output falls off rapidly in late afternoon while high demand often remains.
More electric use (homes, cars) combined with unreliable, variable renewables equals disaster.  How might California avoid it?
Imports to the area are needed to maintain reliability when demand peaks in the afternoon and to ramp up even further for several hours as internal resources draw down. California will have 675 MW of new battery energy storage systems on-line at the start of the summer that can continue to supply stored energy for periods when needed. Reliance on non-firm imports to cover high demand or low resource output conditions heightens the risk that operators will need to use energy emergency alerts (EEA)—and trigger the shedding of firm load in above-normal heat conditions—to maintain a stable BPS at times. Planned resource additions of 1,300 MW over the summer, including 825 MW of new battery storage, are expected to help mitigate late-summer risks.
California plans to suck energy out of neighboring regions.  California depends on other states to supply its energy.  Why?  It's not that California cannot build baseload generation that runs when called, like natural gas, it simply chooses not to.  Gotta meet those renewable energy goals, ya know.... at least on paper.  But are they really effective when the "dirty" energy is produced in other regions?  This is not realistic, and Californians may pay the price this summer with increased blackouts.

In addition, there's the risk that a weather event, such as a wide area heat wave for instance, can make less energy from other regions available as they deal with their own needs.  Imports are unreliable.

There's also:
Additionally, transmission networks can become stressed when events such as wildfires or wide-area heatwaves cause network congestion. The growing reliance on transfers within the Western Interconnection and falling resource capacity in many adjacent areas increases the risk that extreme events will lead to load interruption.

Operation of the BPS can be impacted in areas where wildfires are active as well as areas where there is heightened risk of wildfire ignition due to weather and ground conditions. Wildfire prevention planning in California and other areas include power shut-off programs in high fire-risk areas. When conditions warrant implementing these plans, power lines (including transmission-level lines) may be preemptively de-energized in high fire-risk areas to prevent wildfire ignitions.
So, even if other regions can supply the power California needs to meet its own need, it often can't happen during wildfire season because transmission is shut off so it doesn't start a fire.  Hey... don't you think BURYING transmission might allow it to continue to operate during wildfire season?  Overhead transmission and investor owned utility neglect caused by greed creates disaster.  Again, California's energy policies are insufficient to meet demand.  This isn't an aberration.  This is the new normal of a "clean" energy future.

About Texas:
Variable energy resources from wind and solar are critical to meeting peak electricity demand in ERCOT. Periods of low wind generation or higher-than expected thermal outages create a reliability risk during peak load hours. ERCOT appears to be in a weather cycle that may increase the risk of intensifying drought conditions and higher than normal summer temperatures. These weather factors could result in actual summer peak demand exceeding the forecast, which already anticipates record peak demand levels. Thermal outages may increase during severe and prolonged drought conditions due to cooling water supply and temperature issues.

Highest risk for unserved energy at peak demand hour, late afternoon (Risk can
extend for 1–2 hours after peak as solar PV output diminishes. Periods of low-wind, which usually occur 1–2 hours before peak demand, can also result in extended shortfall risk
.)
Again, reliance on variable, undependable renewables causes shortages.  Texas has a lot of wind and solar.  Blackouts are the result.

This is scary news.  However, the mainstream media chooses not to report reality (surprise!  surprise!).  Instead, the media chooses to focus on climate change being responsible for the shortages.  They also like to talk about other things that don't really matter, like the Colonial Pipeline hack.  Anything but the fact that electric systems dependent upon renewables are not dependable. 

Just look at the capacity factors for wind and solar in the table at the end of the NERC report. The lowest wind capacity factor is listed as 7%, with the majority of them hovering somewhere between 10 and 20%.  This means that those generators can only be expected to reliability produce 7% of their potential.  Do you know how much overbuilding these poor capacity figures require?  Does this even make sense?  We'd have to build way too many to get any kind of "reliability," and even then the "reliability" is only a percentage on paper... reality may differ. 

"But this turbine produces energy reliably 7% of the time!"  However, today is a 0% day." Off go the lights.

Speaking of plans that only work on paper... building enormous amounts of new overhead transmission in order to hook all these poorly performing renewables together to produce a 7% chance of getting energy is so much fantasy.  If increased reliance on renewables requires imports from other regions, what happens when all regions have increased reliance on renewables?  Where does the energy come from then?

The warning is stark.  Nobody is paying attention because it's not what they want to hear.

NERC officials warned:
The full report identifies the extent of the possible deficiencies, and Robb told reporters of his own concerns about how the energy transition might be impacting reliability.

"In our hurry to develop a cleaner resource base, reliability and energy adequacy have to be taken into consideration," he said.

The latest reliability assessment is "quite concerning," John Moura, NERC's director of reliability assessment and performance analysis, told reporters.

Summer 2020 and winter 2021 were "difficult to say the least," Moura said, and the latest assessment signals "similar risks" lie ahead.

In the long-term, system operators must do extensive analysis to ensure the addition of variable resources will not negatively impact reliability, he added. "As we look forward, it really just looks more stressful," Moura said, "because of the different resources coming onto the system."

Get used to it... electricity is going to become a "sometimes" commodity if we continue to spiral faster and faster towards the "zero carbon" fantasy.  Reliability will be sacrificed in the name of "climate change."  Didn't the "clean energy" folks tell us we'd have to make some hard choices?
1 Comment

PJM Plans Studies to Remove Transource IEC From its Plan

5/25/2021

1 Comment

 
Well, it seems that didn't take long.  PJM issued a statement yesterday according to trade press RTO Insider.
Officials at PJM said they were also reviewing the PUC’s decision and that it “appreciates the commission’s consideration.”

“PJM will commence the appropriate planning studies to determine next steps, including identifying any potential reliability issues due to removal of the project from the Regional Transmission Expansion Plan,” the RTO said in a statement.

So PJM is removing the IEC from its plan?  Is that some kind of Freudian slip or a sudden realization?

Dear Dr. Freud would probably also be verrrrry interrrrested in PJM's sudden interest in doing planning studies to identify any potential reliability issues due to removal of the project from its plan, since it refused to do these kinds of studies during the PUC case, insisting that some old data was good enough to determine there was a serious reliability issue that only IEC could solve. 

Was PJM lying then, or is it lying now?

I seem to remember PJM refusing to do these very same studies to support the project's "reliability" claims at the PUC.
The OCA also noted that Transource’s assertions regarding “reliability” as a basis for need refer to a single generation deliverability test performed by PJM in 2018.  Further, the OCA noted PJM neither, performed its full suite of reliability tests to confirm that these reliability violations will result in 2023, nor, performed another generation deliverability test since 2018 which may confirm or refute the results of the 2018 test.  
If PJM didn't do these studies during the PUC case, then it did not have to recognize that there is no reliability issue IEC must solve.  PJM's new studies may magically determine that the project isn't needed after all, and then PJM can remove it from the RTEP.  No fuss, no muss!

Hit it, Alanis...
1 Comment

Pennsylvania PUC Denies Transource IEC Project Application

5/24/2021

2 Comments

 
Picture
Late last week, the PA PUC voted on an Order denying the application of AEP affiliate Transource to build the Independence Energy Connection in Franklin and York Counties.  Today, the PUC issued the Order.

Denied, denied, denied, denied and denied!  The PUC also rescinded Transource's Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for the project, and ordered all related dockets closed.  As far as the PA PUC is concerned, the Transource nightmare is over and done.  Of course, Transource may (and probably will) ask the Commission to reconsider its decision.    After that, Transource may have certain rights to appeal the decision of the PUC.  However, chances of that being successful seem to be hovering between slim and none.

The Commission adopted the Recommended Decision of Judge Barnes, except as modified in the Order.  The modifications are few.  The Commission addressed all the exceptions to Judge Barnes' decision, and granted only one.  That one was the Judge's finding of fact regarding interference with GPS systems used in farming operations.  The Commission struck that finding, but it did not change the outcome.  The second bone of contention was Judge Barnes' recommendation that the Commission should issue a Rule to Show Cause why Transource's CPCN should not be rescinded.  The Commission simply skipped bothering with another proceeding and straight up rescinded Transource's CPCN in this Order.

The Commission reprimanded Transource over several of its exceptions.  One was its contention that ALL the findings of fact by Judge Barnes should be disregarded where they don't agree with Transource's contentions.  Transource forgot to mention WHY, or provide any facts whatsoever, to support this exception.  Exceptions must be specific, or the Commission cannot even consider them.  Denied!
In its Exception No. 8, Transource asserts that the ALJ’s recommendation to deny Project 9A is based on “faulty findings” without specifying any alleged factual or legal error.  In footnote to its Exception, Transource takes issue with certain specified findings by the ALJ and asserts, as a general matter, that all the ALJ’s findings of fact and conclusions of law should be disregarded to the extent the findings “are inconsistent with [Transource’s] Exceptions, Briefs and Testimony in this proceeding.”  Transource Exc. at 39, fn. 27 (emphasis added). 
 
We note that Transource’s Exception, as stated, fails to conform with Commission Regulations for stating exceptions, and lacks sufficient specificity to enable our review.  See 52 Pa. Code § 5.533 (pertaining to exceptions, requiring that the exceptions be stated with supporting reasons for each exception).  A general assertion that all the ALJ’s factual findings and legal conclusions should be disregarded to the extent they are “inconsistent” with a party’s filings does not state a supporting reason to disregard any of the findings and conclusions.  
Transource's team of crack lawyers (the best our money can buy!) should have known better.

They also should have known better regarding their crazy contention that the PA PUC has no authority (under federal law) to deny a project ordered by PJM.  Pennsylvania must evaluate the need for the project under statute.  Pennsylvania's statute is not satisfied by abdicating to PJM's findings of need.  I think this might be my favorite part:
... “need” from a PJM planning perspective may or may not be, as Transource asserts, “consistent with the standard for need under Pennsylvania law.”  It is for this Commission, not PJM, to decide whether the PJM planning perspective is, or is not, in line with the Pennsylvania standard for “need” under the Code, Commission Regulations and relevant caselaw.
BAM!  Read it and weep, Transource.  Of course, Transource must have known that this argument would lead nowhere, and possibly tick off the Commission.  But they went there anyhow.  Was it because Transource simply had nothing else?

Pennsylvania's Consumer Advocate deserves an MVP award for its work on this case.  The Consumer Advocate provided the experts and data that demonstrated how the transmission project would cause additional costs to ratepayers in Pennsylvania, and how PJM refused to consider these impacts.  PJM's claims simply were not true, no matter what lengths it went to in order to continue to push this project along towards approval.  It's refreshing to see all the PJM flim-flam stripped away, and for regulators to evaluate a transmission proposal based on its actual merits, instead of the glammed up package presented by a regional transmission organization.  The judge and the Commission are not buying PJM's story, and are not impressed in the least by PJM's self-importance or overly-complicated geek speak.  It is what it is, and IEC simply isn't needed.
Isn't it time for PJM to fall gracefully on its sword and cancel the project as it has done in the past for the PATH project, the MAPP project, the Monmouth County Reliability Project, and others, when the need for the project simply and magically evaporated?  C'mon, PJM, the time has come!

PJM's first foray into competitive market efficiency projects has been an overly expensive failure.  Transmission congestion is fleeting, and PJM's planning process simply takes too long.  The IEC was no longer needed by the time the PJM Board approved it.  But once PJM decides it wants a project, actual need no longer matters.  It's about the project, not the process.  The lengths PJM went to in order to continue to prop up this project are truly shameful.  It's time for PJM to come to terms with reality and fix its broken processes that allowed this travesty to play out over the last five years, including the changes it made to FERC-approved mechanisms that allow PJM to ignore cost increases to parts of the region caused by projects that lower costs for others, and to ignore new generation coming online on the other side of the transmission constraint.  It has now been proven that neither one of these policies will fool a state regulator on the question of "need."  When PJM does these things, it damages its credibility as a regional transmission planner.  How many times can PJM order and support projects that are not truly needed before they are simply unreliable and unbelievable?  PJM is not acting in the best interests of regional electric consumers when it orders unneeded projects.  It's acting in the financial interests of its utility members.  How many hundreds of millions of dollars have PJM electric consumers paid in their monthly electric bills for projects that were never built?  Transource's IEC, like other cancelled projects before it, will collect all its project costs through FERC-jurisdictional transmission rates even though the project was never built.  FERC transmission incentives allow the owner of a cancelled project to file to collect all its costs in the event of abandonment.  Transource gets made whole, and even earns a return (interest) on its investment until the project is finally paid off.  But what about the citizens, landowners, and communities who made a huge investment in legal fees in order to participate in the PUC case and uncover the truth?  What do they get?  Are they made whole?  No, they simply enjoy not being burdened by a new transmission line in their community, and the personal satisfaction of victory when speaking truth to power.

If it strikes your fancy, go ahead and tell PJM what you think about their actions, and urge them to cancel IEC before it costs you any more money.

Of course, this story would not be complete without recognizing the hundreds of concerned citizens who stepped up, organized, attended meetings and hearings, and participated in the regulatory process.  Ordinary people doing extraordinary things!  Their hard work and determination changed the course of history!  Despite PJM's original "constructability" analysis that the only impediments to this project sited on "vacant land" were bats and crossing state game land, the people have proven that there is no such thing as "vacant land" that nobody cares about.  People care deeply about their land and community, and they will do remarkable things to protect the places they call home.

Let's end with my favorite quote from cultural anthropologist Margaret Mead:
Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it's the only thing that ever has.
Congratulations, folks!  Let the parties begin!
2 Comments

Help Wanted!

5/21/2021

0 Comments

 
Now here's an interesting twist...  Dominion Virginia Energy wants the public's "advice" in siting its new transmission connection to its new offshore wind farm in the Virginia Beach area.
Dominion Energy Virginia is seeking public feedback and advice about linking its planned wind farm, 27 miles off the Virginia Beach shore, to the 500 kilovolt backbone of its statewide power grid at the Fentress substation on Centerville Turnpike in Chesapeake.
Bravo for taking suggestion, Dominion!  Communities burdened by new transmission will absolutely, positively rebel against a fait accompli transmission proposal.
Is there a "good" way to present a transmission line proposal to the public?  Not if you're approaching the communities with a fully-formed idea of what you're going to build and where you're going to put it.  The only good way to involve a community in a transmission proposal is to approach them with a need before making decisions about what to build and where.  Presenting a community with a problem to be solved and allowing meaningful input into the solution selected is the only way a transmission company can get community buy-in and support for the proposal.  Everything else is nothing more than a battle to push a bad idea the community doesn't want off onto someone else.
But Duh-minion only gets it half right... no,  maybe even less than that.  They simply use the *idea* that they are seeking community advice in an attempt to trick the community into thinking they are involved in solving a problem.  When all the window dressing is removed, this is nothing more than your routine transmission siting exercise. 

Dominion has already selected 6 routes.  The community gets to pick its favorite.  Are you kidding me?  That's not how it works and it's not going to fool anyone.  Dominion would have done better to ask for help connecting its offshore wind farm and left the siting options hidden for the time being.  Must be a control issue.  Dominion can't stand not having complete control.


The power company has part of the route nailed down: the 27 miles of underwater cable to a landing point at the state military reservation at Camp Pendleton. It also has proposed an underground route through the southernmost reaches of Naval Air Station Oceana, to comply with regulations restricting structures near airfields, which the Navy must still review.

Its research into what’s on the ground, in terms of neighborhoods, wetlands, wildlife and historic resources has led it to six options for the final roughly 15 miles to the Fentress station.

“We can look at maps and desktop it, but it’s not until we talk to people that we’ll really understand these alternatives,” said Kevin Curtis, Dominion’s vice president, electric transmission.

Guess what alternative they're going to get from the community?  Bury it.  All of it.  On existing rights of way.  Without that alternative, opposition begins.  Why?  Because burial is already an option for portions of the route, such as the path through the air station.  If Dominion can bury it under the ocean, and through the air station, then it can bury it the entire length.
One option for one of these routes would be to bury the lines for a stretch. That could create much more disruption during construction and mean they were costlier to install and repair than running lines overhead but would mean that portion of the lines would not be visible.
Oh, please!  These are transparent excuses that don't even make sense.  Too disruptive... as if having 3 separate overhead 230-kV lines in parallel isn't disruptive at all.  One time disruption to bury the project?  Or 50 years of disruption from an overhead line?  Installing a buried transmission line isn't really that disruptive.  They do it on streets all the time.  It's a shallow, narrow trench, not a whole lot different than fiber optic cable installation.  Costlier to install?  Maybe, but cheaper to maintain, especially in a coastal area subject to extreme weather.  Dominion's excuses are plainly excuses and completely illogical in the face of their plans to bury it at the air station and along a portion of one of the route alternatives.

With this kind of deceptive roll out, Dominion is doomed.  Why?
Five routes would run along the never-built Southeast Parkway, now an open space corridor through the most densely populated neighborhoods between Oceana and an area southwest of Princess Anne Road, between the Virginia Beach National Golf Course and the Princess Anne Athletic Complex.
Two words... densely populated.  It's over before it begins when Dominion ham-hands its rollout like this.

Help wanted?  Not hardly... unless the "help" Dominion is looking for consists of wildfire opposition leading to an entrenched battle.

Well, there goes that offshore wind idea.
0 Comments
<<Previous
Forward>>

    About the Author

    Keryn Newman blogs here at StopPATH WV about energy issues, transmission policy, misguided regulation, our greedy energy companies and their corporate spin.
    In 2008, AEP & Allegheny Energy's PATH joint venture used their transmission line routing etch-a-sketch to draw a 765kV line across the street from her house. Oooops! And the rest is history.

    About
    StopPATH Blog

    StopPATH Blog began as a forum for information and opinion about the PATH transmission project.  The PATH project was abandoned in 2012, however, this blog was not.

    StopPATH Blog continues to bring you energy policy news and opinion from a consumer's point of view.  If it's sometimes snarky and oftentimes irreverent, just remember that the truth isn't pretty.  People come here because they want the truth, instead of the usual dreadful lies this industry continues to tell itself.  If you keep reading, I'll keep writing.


    Need help opposing unneeded transmission?
    Email me


    Search This Site

    Got something to say?  Submit your own opinion for publication.

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010

    Categories

    All
    $$$$$$
    2023 PJM Transmission
    Aep Vs Firstenergy
    Arkansas
    Best Practices
    Best Practices
    Big Winds Big Lie
    Can Of Worms
    Carolinas
    Citizen Action
    Colorado
    Corporate Propaganda
    Data Centers
    Democracy Failures
    DOE Failure
    Emf
    Eminent Domain
    Events
    Ferc Action
    FERC Incentives Part Deux
    Ferc Transmission Noi
    Firstenergy Failure
    Good Ideas
    Illinois
    Iowa
    Kansas
    Land Agents
    Legislative Action
    Marketing To Mayberry
    MARL
    Missouri
    Mtstorm Doubs Rebuild
    Mtstormdoubs Rebuild
    New Jersey
    New Mexico
    Newslinks
    NIETC
    Opinion
    Path Alternatives
    Path Failures
    Path Intimidation Attempts
    Pay To Play
    Potomac Edison Investigation
    Power Company Propaganda
    Psc Failure
    Rates
    Regulatory Capture
    Skelly Fail
    The Pjm Cartel
    Top Ten Clean Line Mistakes
    Transource
    Valley Link Transmission
    Washington
    West Virginia
    Wind Catcher
    Wisconsin

Copyright 2010 StopPATH WV, Inc.