StopPATH WV
  • News
  • StopPATH WV Blog
  • FAQ
  • Events
  • Fundraisers
  • Make a Donation
  • Landowner Resources
  • About PATH
  • Get Involved
  • Commercials
  • Links
  • About Us
  • Contact

Investor Owned Utilities and Risk

8/25/2013

4 Comments

 
Risk.  The word has many meanings in the utility industry, but it all boils down to undertaking risk in order to provide a dividend for shareholders. Sometimes the riskiest exploits produce the biggest return.  An investor owned utility's loyalty to the shareholders who continue to fund management's lavish lifestyle overrules any loyalty to the customers being provided a necessary service at a reasonable price.

The competition for investor dollars fuels a ratcheting up of risk in order to provide bigger and bigger returns.

Where does it all end?

From a regulatory perspective, risk means not being permitted to undertake certain actions that will increase income of the regulated company.  The purpose of regulation is to police the actions of private entities operating in a monopoly construct to ensure that customers are provided fair service at a reasonable cost.  Regulators are the final decision-makers on utility proposals, and also serve as creator and enforcer of the rules regulated utilities must follow.  Regulators are supposed to be protecting consumers, while also allowing the utility to make a reasonable profit in order to continue to operate the system.

Everything an investor owned utility does in a regulated environment is viewed through the lens of financial risk. 

Should the company file a rate case?  What's the risk that the return will be lowered?  What's the risk that some costs may be disallowed?

Should the company sell assets to itself?  What's the risk that the price will be adjusted downward?  What's the risk that the transaction will not be approved?

Should the company break the rules?  What's the risk that the company will be caught?  If caught, what's the risk that the company will have to pay out more than it made while breaking the rules?

Regulatory risk really isn't risky at all.

Investor owned utilities make huge investments in buying the favor of their regulators.  It's just one great, big utility club, where the regulators and the regulated interact daily, convincing each other that their actions benefit consumers.  Consumers are not allowed to join.  Regulators and regulated will find themselves together again and again, therefore they develop a cozy working relationship.

But it's an unbalanced relationship.  While the regulator may think they're all sitting at the same table, they're not.  The investor owned utility has nothing to lose.  And the regulator's gun is loaded with blanks.  An investor owned utility has access to a bottomless pool of consumer funding to appeal any regulatory decision it doesn't like, endlessly.  Regulators have access to a very limited supply of money for such things, therefore, a utility can simply outspend them until the desired result is achieved.  In many instances, it's not even worth trying enforce the rules for the regulator, and they may cave in before it even gets to this point.

This is a settlement.  Ideally, in settlement, each party gives up something in order to create a balanced outcome.  However, an investor owned utility will never enter a settlement with an equal number of eggs in its trading basket.  Its rate case or asset transfer is thickly padded with things to give away that the utility doesn't really care about.  The regulator's basket has less eggs at the beginning, therefore, each egg that's given away by a regulator means someone goes hungry.  The regulator comes out with one egg, and the utility comes out with a dozen.  This isn't a fair or balanced outcome.

And it's even more skewed when a utility gets caught breaking the rules.  Rules are meant to be followed, not partially followed, or mostly followed, but completely followed.  There should be simply no eggs in the regulator's basket to give away.  It's impossible to break half a rule.  When a utility breaks the rules for profit and gets caught, it's egg basket is full.  A utility can give away some of the profits it made breaking the rule, while the regulator can only give away the rule and violate the trust of consumers, who expect that regulators enforce rules.

When a regulator begins negotiating a settlement in a rule breaking case, they are giving away the ability to break the rules without consequence.

How do you think the investor owned utility views this?

1.  Chances are we won't get caught and we'll get to keep all the profits we made breaking the rule!

2.  Even if we do get caught, we'll only have to give back part of the profits we made breaking the rule!

3.  For every illegal action regulators catch, there are hundreds more where we'll never get caught!

4.  Following the rule - zero profit.  Breaking the rule - priceless!

Breaking the rules is very profitable for investor owned utilities, therefore they will keep doing so until the cost of punishment is higher than the retained profit of breaking the rules.  Breaking the rules is low to no risk.

Filing a rate case, or proposing a ridiculous, overpriced sale of assets to itself, is also low risk these days.  Lazy, captured regulators and ineffectual consumer advocates, who are more interested in maintaining relationships with utilities and their lawyers than with the consumers they are supposed to represent, are failing you.

Those who stand for nothing, will fall for anything.

Enough is enough.


4 Comments
Adam
8/25/2013 04:49:37 pm

YOU NAILED IT!!!!

Reply
cmk
8/26/2013 02:50:48 am

And the system was set up to be like this: http://calhounpowerline.com/a-little-history-regulation-and-deregulation/

Also, there's not very much downside risk for the utilities. If something goes wrong, its highly unlikely that regulators will let the power go out - rather,the utilities will get bailed out (see, for example, California electricity crisis).

Reply
D.F.M.
8/26/2013 04:27:55 am

The only winner in a settlement is the utility. Don't forget that.

Reply
Temple Builder link
1/3/2014 06:58:58 pm

The competition for investor dollars fuels a ratcheting up of risk in order to provide bigger and bigger returns.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    About the Author

    Keryn Newman blogs here at StopPATH WV about energy issues, transmission policy, misguided regulation, our greedy energy companies and their corporate spin.
    In 2008, AEP & Allegheny Energy's PATH joint venture used their transmission line routing etch-a-sketch to draw a 765kV line across the street from her house. Oooops! And the rest is history.

    About
    StopPATH Blog

    StopPATH Blog began as a forum for information and opinion about the PATH transmission project.  The PATH project was abandoned in 2012, however, this blog was not.

    StopPATH Blog continues to bring you energy policy news and opinion from a consumer's point of view.  If it's sometimes snarky and oftentimes irreverent, just remember that the truth isn't pretty.  People come here because they want the truth, instead of the usual dreadful lies this industry continues to tell itself.  If you keep reading, I'll keep writing.


    Need help opposing unneeded transmission?
    Email me


    Search This Site

    Got something to say?  Submit your own opinion for publication.

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010

    Categories

    All
    $$$$$$
    2023 PJM Transmission
    Aep Vs Firstenergy
    Arkansas
    Best Practices
    Best Practices
    Big Winds Big Lie
    Can Of Worms
    Carolinas
    Citizen Action
    Colorado
    Corporate Propaganda
    Data Centers
    Democracy Failures
    DOE Failure
    Emf
    Eminent Domain
    Events
    Ferc Action
    FERC Incentives Part Deux
    Ferc Transmission Noi
    Firstenergy Failure
    Good Ideas
    Illinois
    Iowa
    Kansas
    Land Agents
    Legislative Action
    Marketing To Mayberry
    MARL
    Missouri
    Mtstorm Doubs Rebuild
    Mtstormdoubs Rebuild
    New Jersey
    New Mexico
    Newslinks
    NIETC
    Opinion
    Path Alternatives
    Path Failures
    Path Intimidation Attempts
    Pay To Play
    Potomac Edison Investigation
    Power Company Propaganda
    Psc Failure
    Rates
    Regulatory Capture
    Skelly Fail
    The Pjm Cartel
    Top Ten Clean Line Mistakes
    Transource
    Valley Link Transmission
    Washington
    West Virginia
    Wind Catcher
    Wisconsin

Copyright 2010 StopPATH WV, Inc.