StopPATH WV
  • News
  • StopPATH WV Blog
  • FAQ
  • Events
  • Fundraisers
  • Make a Donation
  • Landowner Resources
  • About PATH
  • Get Involved
  • Commercials
  • Links
  • About Us
  • Contact

Clean Line Does NOT Sell Electricity!

7/21/2016

4 Comments

 
One more time, with feeling...
Clean Line Does NOT Sell Electricity!
Hallelujah, brothers and sisters!

CLEAN LINE DOES NOT SELL ELECTRICITY!
That's right, Clean Line does not sell electricity.  The only thing Clean Line can sell is transmission capacity.  Clean Line is selling space on its gigantic, aerial extension cord.  The cost of energy to plug into the extension cord is not included in the cost of the cord.  It's just a cord, not plugged into anything.  If you want to actually receive electricity over Clean Line's extension cord, you must purchase electricity separately from another company, at an additional cost.

Except...
However,  [Clean Line's Mark] Lawlor says the wind farms aren't even built yet.
WGEM.com: Quincy News, Weather, Sports, and Radio
So, even if you wanted to buy some electricity to light up Clean Line's floppy cord, you couldn't.  Customers are just supposed to hope that electric generators get built, and that their prices for electricity are "low cost?"  Clean Line said of its only "customer," a state created agency authorized to operate as an electric utility wholesaler for the benefit of its combined members and cities:
"They estimated that they will save their customers $10 million a year because this power is so much cheaper than they can get today," Mark Lawlor, Director of Development with Clean Line, said.
Mark, I think you're a liar.  A deceiver of the highest order.

I don't think the cities estimated that they will save their customers anything.  I think Clean Line did their estimating for them.  And then pretended that the cities did it themselves.  From Clean Line's Proposal to The Missouri Joint Municipal Electric Utility Commission:
Preliminary calculations, assuming existing production tax credits for wind project participation in the project, could reduce costs by as much as $10M/year or $10 per megawatt hour compared to delivery of other wind projects from SPP to MISO.
Those would be Clean Line's calculations, since it was a part of Clean Line's Proposal.

In addition, Clean Line's $10M savings proposal "assumes existing production tax credits for wind project participation in the project."  Except these wind farms aren't even built yet.  And only wind farms that begin construction in 2016 are eligible for the "existing production tax credit" of $.023/kwh generated.  Any future wind farms constructed will have their tax credit reduced and eventually phased out.  The potential cost of future wind power is directly related to the construction date of the wind farm.  And
The energy suppliers are waiting on approval to build the transmission line, which was already denied twice by the Public Service Commission.
Low cost?  $10M yearly savings?  Pure speculation.

Now let's examine another fact...

Clean Line is NOT Negotiating Directly With Cities!
While WGEM is to be commended for its revelation that Clean Line does not sell electricity, it also wrongly believes that on "Tuesday night, the City of Hannibal decided to move forward with talks with the company."

That ship has sailed.  Hannibal must now negotiate with the MJMEUC to purchase Clean Line transmission capacity from MJMEUC, if it believes the bucket of $10M savings hogwash. 

Clean Line's biggest fan in the City of Hannibal can now negotiate only with MJMEUC to sign up for a portion of the 200 MW of capacity on Clean Line that the organization optioned in its "contract" with Clean Line.  Any future agreement with Hannibal is not additional capacity, or another "contract" with Clean Line.  It's simply MJMEUC re-sellling its option to Hannibal.

MJMEUC only purchased an option to buy up to 200 MW of capacity, because its "contract" with Clean Line allows MJMEUC to decide how much capacity it will actually purchase 60 days before Clean Line would supposedly begin transmitting electricity.  At that time, MJMEUC can opt to purchase absolutely nothing.
In addition, Transmission Customer may, through the Notice of Decision, reduce any or all of the Contract Capacities under this Agreement without limit or penalty. All other terms and conditions in this Agreement will remain in effect with respect to such Contract Capacities, if any, that remain after such reduction. For the avoidance of doubt, and notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, (i) the final KS-MO
Transmission Service Contract Capacity as reflected in tile Notice of Decision may be any amount between 0 and 200 MW
; (ii) if Transmission Customer's total KS-MO Transmission Service amount is less than or equal to 100 MW, such Contract Capacity shall all be subject to the pricing, terms and conditions applicable to the first tranche; (iii) if Transmission Customer's total KS-MO Transmission Service amount exceeds 100 MW, the amount of Contract Capacity that exceeds 100 MW shall be subject to the pricing, terms and conditions applicable to the
second tranche; (iv) unless Transmission Customer has elected the additional 25 MW pursuant to Section 3.3, the final MO-PJM Transmission Service Contract Capacity as reflected in the Notice of Decision may be any amount between 0 and 25 MW and shall be subject to the pricing, terms and conditions of this Agreement other than Section 3.3; and (v) if Transmission Customer has elected the additional 25 MW pursuant to Section 3.3, the final MO-PJM Transmission Service Contract Capacity as reflected in the Notice of Decision may be any amount between 0 and 50 MW, and if such Contract Capacity exceeds 25 MW, the amount of the Contract Capacity that
exceeds 25 MW shall be subject to the pricing, terms and conditions stated in Section 3.3.
This isn't a binding contract at all.

And about that MO-PJM service:  Clean Line is offering service on its line for MJMEUC to export its members' own dirty power into another region, which will prolong the life of dirty, old electric generators owned by member Cities.  Because, despite his profession of love for "clean" wind power, Bob Stevenson is now asking the City of Hannibal to investigate the purchase of some old, dirty diesel electricity generators from the city of Palmyra.  Bob thinks it might be cheaper.  Diesel generators are about as dirty as they come -- they run on diesel fuel.  Is Bob planning to ship his dirty diesel power to PJM on a Clean Line?

Of course, if Hannibal is getting a large portion of its power supply from diesel generators, could it really advertise:  “There are also potential benefits to several of our local businesses in the fact that they could advertise that their products were made with renewable resources or ‘clean energy”?
Clean or dirty, Bob, which is it?

So, let's review with a pop quiz!

Clean Line Pop Quiz

Submit
4 Comments
Joel Dyer
7/22/2016 04:58:11 am

The DOE made the 1222 announcement about the Plains and Eastern transmission line three months ago. I haven't seen a single press release about wind generating companies starting windmill construction in Oklahoma. Haven't seen any announcement of firm commitments from purchasers on the East Coast. Maybe it's a chicken and egg situation? The utilities in the East don't want to sign agreements to buy from nonexistent wind companies and the wind companies don't want to build build wind farms without firm purchase agreements. I imagine Clean Line is frantically trying to broker deals between wind companies and utilities. Their problem is that utilities aren't as stupid or corrupt as the DOE.

Reply
Keryn
7/22/2016 05:10:36 am

Nailed it, Joel! Wind farms cannot begin construction without customers. Clean Line cannot begin construction without customers. Wind farms and customers aren't connecting. Clean Line is peddling "cheap" wind power it doesn't own or control and is not authorized to sell.

Reply
Joel Dyer
7/22/2016 06:22:44 am

I think this whole thing has always depended on Obama's Clean Power Plan. If that is enacted, then Clean Line expects to have some captive customers. While the Clean Power Plan is in the courts, everyone is staying away.

Aunt Bee link
7/22/2016 08:05:41 am

Oh, dear. Time to issue another Kurt Alert?

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    About the Author

    Keryn Newman blogs here at StopPATH WV about energy issues, transmission policy, misguided regulation, our greedy energy companies and their corporate spin.
    In 2008, AEP & Allegheny Energy's PATH joint venture used their transmission line routing etch-a-sketch to draw a 765kV line across the street from her house. Oooops! And the rest is history.

    About
    StopPATH Blog

    StopPATH Blog began as a forum for information and opinion about the PATH transmission project.  The PATH project was abandoned in 2012, however, this blog was not.

    StopPATH Blog continues to bring you energy policy news and opinion from a consumer's point of view.  If it's sometimes snarky and oftentimes irreverent, just remember that the truth isn't pretty.  People come here because they want the truth, instead of the usual dreadful lies this industry continues to tell itself.  If you keep reading, I'll keep writing.


    Need help opposing unneeded transmission?
    Email me


    Search This Site

    Got something to say?  Submit your own opinion for publication.

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010

    Categories

    All
    $$$$$$
    2023 PJM Transmission
    Aep Vs Firstenergy
    Arkansas
    Best Practices
    Best Practices
    Big Winds Big Lie
    Can Of Worms
    Carolinas
    Citizen Action
    Colorado
    Corporate Propaganda
    Data Centers
    Democracy Failures
    DOE Failure
    Emf
    Eminent Domain
    Events
    Ferc Action
    FERC Incentives Part Deux
    Ferc Transmission Noi
    Firstenergy Failure
    Good Ideas
    Illinois
    Iowa
    Kansas
    Land Agents
    Legislative Action
    Marketing To Mayberry
    MARL
    Missouri
    Mtstorm Doubs Rebuild
    Mtstormdoubs Rebuild
    New Jersey
    New Mexico
    Newslinks
    NIETC
    Opinion
    Path Alternatives
    Path Failures
    Path Intimidation Attempts
    Pay To Play
    Potomac Edison Investigation
    Power Company Propaganda
    Psc Failure
    Rates
    Regulatory Capture
    Skelly Fail
    The Pjm Cartel
    Top Ten Clean Line Mistakes
    Transource
    Valley Link Transmission
    Washington
    West Virginia
    Wind Catcher
    Wisconsin

Copyright 2010 StopPATH WV, Inc.