StopPATH WV
  • News
  • StopPATH WV Blog
  • FAQ
  • Events
  • Fundraisers
  • Make a Donation
  • Landowner Resources
  • About PATH
  • Get Involved
  • Commercials
  • Links
  • About Us
  • Contact

Voters Vanquish Transmission Line

11/3/2021

1 Comment

 
Picture
Maine citizens delivered a historic upset to invasive merchant transmission line New England Clean Energy Connect at the polls yesterday.

NECEC, a merchant spin off from Central Maine Power, is under contract to deliver 1200MW of "clean" hydropower from Quebec to Massachusetts.  The project would be paid for by Massachusetts electric consumers, if they can ever get it built, including the nearly $100M spent on political nonsense that tried in vain to stop the referendum.

This hard won grassroots victory has been in the works for several years.  The first project Massachusetts contracted with to buy hydro from Quebec was routed through New Hampshire, however that state defeated it through the regulatory process and the courts.  Next, Massachusetts stupidly set its sights on a different overhead transmission project through the pristine woods of Maine.  After all, what does Massachusetts care about the environment of any other state but its own?  It also had no money on the table.  The merchant transmission utilities were falling all over themselves to build the project because it could be wildly profitable, all paid for by Massachusetts consumers.  But only if it actually delivered power.  Power cannot be delivered from a line that is never built.  Has Massachusetts finally learned its lesson?  No other state wants to sacrifice its environment so that Massachusetts can virtue signal about "clean energy."

The NECEC project was widely opposed by the citizens of Maine who would have to live with it.  The citizens opposed the project through the regulatory process, however Maine's governor inked a deal with CMP to distribute a few trinkets to the citizens in exchange for their sacrifice and put her thumb on the scale for regulatory approval.  But the citizens persisted.  They successfully passed legislation to stop the project, but their governor vetoed it.  But the citizens persisted.  They gathered enough signatures for a referendum to stop the project in 2020.  However, CMP battled it in court and the referendum was dubbed unconstitutional before it could even be voted upon.  But the citizens persisted.  The citizens gathered enough signatures for a second referendum with different, constitutional wording and CMP was unsuccessful in stopping it from going to a vote.  CMP and its foreign-based parent company, along with Hydro Quebec, poured nearly $100M into a political campaign to defeat the referendum.  But the citizens persisted.

Yesterday, the referendum passed with a resounding 59% of the vote.  The citizens persisted and were victorious!

In the wake of their spanking from the voters, CMP once again claimed the referendum was unconstitutional.  But I gotta ask... if CMP was so certain the referendum was unconstitutional and would be set aside by a court, why did they spend nearly $100M to attempt to defeat it?  If they were so certain, they should have saved their millions for the court battle.  CMP's money is not where its mouth is today.  In fact, CMP wagered against itself with a hugely expensive campaign to defeat something they now claim is unconstitutional.  So, the battle will continue in the courts.  And the citizens will persist.  At what point will this project become too expensive for CMP?  When will they wake up and quit throwing good money after bad?  Because NECEC is a merchant transmission project, CMP will never recover the money it has spent on this project.  And it's a bundle.

CMP began construction of its project earlier this year, even when the referendum campaign was in process.  That was pretty stupid.  But the trees will eventually grow back, because the citizens persisted.

What does this mean for the transmission opposition world?  We have a new tool in our toolbox!  Appeals and legislation are no longer the end of the road for transmission opponents.  A referendum is now a possibility.  Of course, the referendum was also hugely expensive to the citizens of Maine.  However, they had a little help from some generation owners in the region who ran their own separate campaign to pass the referendum.  And we all know that in the transmission opposition world the enemy of our enemy is our friend.  This begs the question of whether other generation owners will step into other transmission battles to pull off a similar victory?  The rest of this story has yet to be written.

Meanwhile... CONGRATULATIONS to the citizens of Maine on this historic victory!  Their persistence and hard work to preserve their environment is nothing less than heroic.

And let's end with another foundational maxim of transmission opposition...
Picture
1 Comment

FERC's New Nightmare

10/10/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
S&P Global tells us that some transmission owners and former energy regulators aren't exactly gung-ho over the congressional infrastructure thing.  Two things stick in their craw... federal siting and permitting and taxpayer-funded anchor tenant contracts.

Strike up the band... it's not every day I agree with some transmission owners and former energy regulators!

On the possibility that FERC could take over siting and permitting of new transmission

"I think members of Congress are overestimating the federal government's ability to approve transmission lines in a speedy manner while underestimating the controversy this will foment amongst constituents," said Tony Clark, a Republican former FERC chair.
Oh yes, I've been fomenting since I was knee-high to  grasshopper and have big plans for my fomenting future.

Clark continued:
But strengthening FERC's hand in permitting may not resolve those issues and could even create new ones, former FERC member Clark said. Intervenors will still be able to challenge new projects at the federal level, according to Clark. And allowing FERC to override states' decisions not to condemn private property in support of a transmission developer's plans could put the agency "in a difficult position."

"It looks to me like a nightmare scenario for FERC," Clark said.
And so it shall be.  If FERC thinks it's finally gotten a handle on the gas pipeline protestors that have been disturbing their processes and haunting their headquarters for years, they've got another think coming.

And why would FERC want to attract this kind of attention when it could, instead, make transmission better and less likely to be opposed?  You catch more flies with honey than you do with vinegar, FERC.  More on this coming soon....

On the issue of taxpayer-funded anchor tenants:
Some market participants have also expressed concern with the anchor tenant program. Transmission developer ITC Holdings Corp. said the Senate improved the proposal by specifying that projects funded through the program should not conflict with projects emerging through the regional transmission organization stakeholder process. But the bill still risks subsidizing uneconomic projects, while overall program funding of $2.5 billion "is small," ITC's vice president of federal and regulatory affairs Nina Plaushin said.
That's right... regulated companies that build regionally planned transmission projects are protecting their golden goose from unregulated, unplanned merchant transmission that would be the sole beneficiary of the completely misguided anchor tenant proposal.  In brief, this proposal would make the federal government purchase transmission capacity from a merchant project that doesn't have enough customers to become viable.  Of course, the government wouldn't USE the capacity, but the merchant transmission developer would USE the cash provided by the anchor tenant contract to finance its project.  But fake government customers do NOT make a merchant transmission project needed.  Merchant transmission is a market-based concept where transmission is built in response to a market need.  If there is no market for a particular merchant transmission project, then it should not be built.  These roads to nowhere should not be artificially propped up using taxpayer funds.  The whole idea is idiotic.

This entire article demonstrates that perhaps the "clean energy" crowd has proposed too many conflicting "good things" to encourage more electric transmission construction and that all these different goodie bags banging together are creating so much friction, it's going to blow the whole idea of new transmission off the map. 

They don't realize that they're killing their golden goose.
0 Comments

Can Unicorn Farts Power Your Refrigerator?

9/23/2021

1 Comment

 
Just because I've been too busy to write doesn't mean I haven't been paying attention.  I have... and now that I've found the way out from under other projects, you get to hear all about it!  Lucky you!  (Hey, remember, reading this blog is voluntary.)

Do you want to sacrifice your reliable electric service in order to rely on power sources that have not yet been invented?  It looks like New York does.

The graph included in this article kind of took my breath away yesterday.  Here it is:
Picture
The power source at the number three slot doesn't even exist!  New York is going to provide 10% of the power it needs in 2040 using technology that does not currently exist!  "Dispatchable emmissions-free resources" is footnoted to point out that this resource is, "Not commercially available at this time, but will be critical to future grid reliability."  Is this a sensible, reliable plan?

Take note also that aside from nuclear, all of these resources are variable.  That is that they are not "dispatchable" at will.  They cannot always perform when called.  So, less than 10% of New York's future power could actually be reliably turned on when needed.

Another 7% or so of the resource is undefined "imports."  Imports of what, and from where?  If these are supposed to be imports of dispatchable resources from other states, what happens if those states also develop a plan similar to New York's that closes them down because they are  not "clean"?

New York seems pretty confident about its plan.  Maybe they plan to capture and enslave a herd of unicorns who will be forced to produce methane that can be converted into energy?  Sounds as plausible as other "not commercially available" sources these days.

Guard your unicorn!  The times, they are a'changing.
1 Comment

Isn't That Cozy?

7/1/2021

0 Comments

 
Transmission owners American Transmission Company, ITC Midwest, and Dairyland Power fell on their sword this week and begged the Wisconsin Public Service Commission to void their permit to build the Cardinal-Hickory Creek Transmission project across Wisconsin and Iowa.  I'm not sure that's ever happened before, but the bigger question is why, and how are the companies trying to subvert due process by requesting the PSC re-open the case and make a new decision?

The story goes that during discovery in a circuit court appeals case where opposing organizations accused PSC Commissioner Mike Huebsch of bias toward the project, evidence was uncovered showing that Huebsch communicated with utility employees using an encrypted text message app.

*inserting tongue in cheek*

Of course, the utilities involved insist upon complete transparency and are urging the PSC to "do the right thing" and re-open the case in order to take another vote.

*removing tongue in cheek*

If the permit is revoked, the circuit court case looking into instances of commissioner bias collapses.  Is this a way for the utilities and the commissioner to save face and possible charges resulting from a full investigation while sweeping the whole matter under the rug, never to be spoken of again?

Perhaps its time for the legislature or the Attorney General to open an independent investigation of improper communications between the PSC and the utilities it regulates?  It can't be neatly swept under the rug and forgotten because, without consequences, it will only happen again.

Utilities and their regulators across the country have had cozy relationships forever.  Utilities have entire departments devoted to schmoozing and lobbying regulators to receive approval for new plans paid for by consumers.  Utilities compile and internally share dossiers about regulators' hobbies, interests, family members and other personal information that utility employees can use to schmooze up to (or maybe hide in exchange for favors?) regulators.  Utilities have historically pushed the envelope of what's proper when it comes to influencing decisions of public officials.  How much influence can they get away with before the regulator puts up a wall to protect himself?  How far can they go before the improper influence is discovered and revealed?

FirstEnergy, ComEd, and other utilities became embroiled in scandal and criminal investigations recently when their improper influence on regulators and legislators was revealed.  Now perhaps we can add ATC and ITC to the ever growing list of utilities who aren't fooling anyone anymore.  They all do it.  However, only a few are ever caught.

Does this mean that regulators cannot develop outside friendships with employees of the utilities they regulate?  Yes!  Yes, it does.  A regulator is sitting in a seat of public trust.  He must avoid all personal relationships with the utilities he regulates because they create a perception of bias.  The revolving door of regulatory capture circulates career utility employees between utilities, law firms that work for utilities, and regulatory bodies.  This has never been a good idea!  Anyone who takes on the responsibility of sitting in the regulator seat must put his relationships with utilities and utility law firms on hold for the duration of his term.

Huebsch claims that his encrypted text messages with ATC’s senior Manager-State Government Relations, and others involved in the Cardinal-Hickory creek proceeding, were innocent friendly talk about sports, health and family.  He claimed that PSC matters are "just not that interesting."  Au contraire!  PSC matters are incredibly interesting to utility employees trying to influence state governmental matters.  If the messages were so innocent, why were they encrypted and/or deleted?  What actually went on here?  Will the people burdened with a new transmission line of questionable necessity ever find out?  The State of Wisconsin owes them an explanation!

The Wisconsin PSC is supposed to take up the matter today to decide whether to void the CHC permit and re-open the case.  If it does so, at the very least it owes full reimbursement to all the parties who participated in the first proceeding that was tainted by Huebsch's appearance of bias.  The parties would be forced to shell out a bunch more money participating in a second proceeding through no fault of their own.

But there's more than that... how can the public ever trust the Wisconsin PSC again if it sweeps possible bias by one of its Commissioners under the rug?  That whole place needs to be dismantled, aired out, and rebuilt.  It's a matter of public trust.
0 Comments

Grain Belt Express Moving Forward With Eminent Domain Threats

6/29/2021

1 Comment

 
Picture
There, fixed the headline of this awful article on NPR that proclaims, "Grain Belt Express Moving Forward With Land Purchases."  How is it that this reporter gets everything wrong?  And I do mean everything.  I'm not sure there's even one sentence in this "news" article that is factual.  It's nothing but Invenergy's propaganda, and this lazy reporter bought it hook, line and sinker.  He did not talk to any other sources to verify any of the information he was given.  Did he learn that at journalism school?  Did he even earn a degree in journalism?  Or did he get a degree in political schmoozing?  Did he develop the lazy habit of simply reprinting corporate propaganda because it was quick and convenient?

Here's where the facts don't support the narrative in the article:
A project to generate electricity using wind turbines in Kansas and distribute the power in the Midwest and east coast is moving forward.
Invenergy has purchased nearly half of the land it needs in northern Missouri for the construction project that will begin in earnest in 2023. All of those deals have been the product of voluntary negotiations with landowners willing to sell, according to the company, although Invenergy could have used eminent domain to acquire the land.
Moving forward?  What does that even mean?  It's not fully permitted, it has no interconnection agreement to connect to the rest of the grid, and it has no customers.  It's been that way for pretty much the last decade.  It's not moving anywhere.

I seriously doubt that Invenergy has purchased nearly half the land it needs in northern Missouri.  Qu'est-ce que c'est "nearly," Invenergy?  Wasn't it something like 45% of the land in both Kansas and Missouri in Invenergy's recent letter to landowners (with nearly all of it in Kansas)?  So, 45% is "nearly" half?  Nearly only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades, Invenergy.  Did Invenergy really make this claim, or did the reporter misunderstand the information he was given and Invenergy hasn't bothered to correct him because they *like* the misinformation being presented?

What is "earnest" construction?  Is that unlike GBE's current quasi-construction on property purchased outright in order to avoid time and other constraints placed on its permit by the MO PSC in order to "protect" landowners?  Invenergy is currently engaged in apathetically building a bridge to nowhere.  Fact:  Invenergy won't be building anything anywhere until it is fully permitted, has interconnection agreements, and enough customers to make the line economic (GBE's loss leader pricing to Missouri municipalities doesn't count).

Voluntary?  Didn't use eminent domain to acquire land? 

***BREAKING NEWS FLASH for Reporter Ahl***

Invenergy has been sending a vaguely threatening letter to all landowners who refuse to sign.  It says
In certain circumstances, for example when landowners have stated their intention not to
engage in a voluntary negotiation process or have repeatedly refused attempts to be contacted by the Project, the only option available to Grain Belt Express is to pursue a legal proceeding for right-of-way acquisition. Missouri law requires landowners be notified in writing no less than 60 days in advance of the intended initiation of any right-of-way acquisition legal proceeding. Kansas has no prior notice requirement, however the Project intends to inform landowners prior to beginning any legal proceedings. To be clear, this letter is being mailed to all landowners for informational purposes and does not constitute such notice.
That sort of looks like a threat of eminent domain action to me.  I suspect that's Invenergy's intention as well.  You can take your "voluntary" and "willing to sell" and line the manure pit with it.  Landowners are being coerced to sign agreements under threat of eminent domain.

And if that's not factual enough, perhaps Ahl might be interested in one of the actual 60-day condemnation notices being sent to "selected" landowners?  These notices say:
If we are not able to come to terms on an easement agreement within 60 days of this letter, Grain Belt intends to file a condemnation action regarding the referenced property.
Any easement acquired as the result of this letter is in no way a voluntary action by a landowner willing to sell.  It's just another threat, this one more ominous.

Will Invenergy actually file on day 61?  We haven't quite gotten there yet, and the letter only says it will file, not when.  Both letters also sort of insinuate that the condemnation filing ends negotiations and sets the price.  In my experience, the condemnation filing was only the beginning of serious negotiation to acquire property.  The condemning entity would most likely rather not have to engage in the whole process and be willing to settle just to prevent a price for your property being set by a board of your landowning neighbors.  In fact, the letter itself says:
As it relates to the proposed acquisition, under the Missouri law, you have the right to:

b. Make a counteroffer and engage in further negotiations;
The list of landowner rights after condemnation is filed are required to be included in the letter under state law.  Landowners have plenty of leverage and can settle at any time, not just before condemnation is filed.  Maybe Invenergy isn't going to make condemnation filings until some time down the road when it has county assents, a permit in Illinois, interconnection agreements, and customers to pay for the project?  I dunno... just trying to apply a little logic because Invenergy's land acquisition cart is way ahead of its project pony.  I wonder why Invenergy is so interested in signing "voluntary" easements  for a project that is years away from actual construction?  Something smells here...

Maybe it's this?
The issue could come up again next year, but Luckey said the company isn’t concerned with that, as Invenergy is open to talking with lawmakers.
“It’s about coming to the table and letting them know we respect their point of view and the constituents they represent,” Luckey said. “We want to be a partner with them, and we are going to continue education and outreach with citizens and lawmakers.”
Coming to the table with legislators and playing a little footsie?  Respect must be earned.  Everyone knows those legislators are not acting in the best interests of their Missouri constituents, but in the interest of an out-of-state company's profits.  Missourians will vote accordingly.

And then there's this bold faced lie:
Luckey said linking the Grain Belt Express to the power grid could have helped avoid the massive power outage Texas experienced in February.
“The line would have made it possible to import substantial amounts of excess electricity to supply from other regions to address those outages,” Luckey said.

Except Texas has its own grid that is not connected to the rest of us.  They like it that way so they can control their own energy policy and avoid federal meddling.  Texas can't import anything from Grain Belt Express or anyone else, and that's not going to change. 

And let's end with this, which indicates that Invenergy's broadband promises may be going the way of the monopole... just an empty promise that falls to the wayside in order to increase Invenergy's profits.
Invenergy also lists benefits to Missouri including  the possibility of using the infrastructure to improve broadband internet connectivity to underserved areas.
Possibility?  Seems like it's getting less possible as time goes on.  When are Missouri legislators going to wake up and realize they're being played for fools?

This is possibly the worst reporting on GBE... ever.
1 Comment

Shocker:  Unreliable Renewables Cause Power Shortages

6/15/2021

1 Comment

 
It wasn't even a month ago that I wrote about NERC's recent predictions that increased reliance on renewables, such as solar and wind, in both California and Texas would cause shortages this summer that could require calls for consumer conservation, and eventually rolling blackouts if it gets bad enough.

Well, guess what?  It's happening, just as predicted.

California tells public to prepare for heatwave; power prices soar.

The California power grid operator told the public to prepare to conserve energy next week if needed as homes and businesses crank up their air conditioners to escape what is forecast to be a brutal heatwave.

But the ISO said it will notify the public if it needs to take steps to reduce electricity use, including a call for public conservation and if the grid becomes seriously stressed, rotating outages.

The group responsible for North American electric reliability has already warned that California is the U.S. region most at risk of power shortages this summer because the state increasingly relies on intermittent energy sources like wind and solar...

And what did California do?  It added more solar.  Yay.  Seems like it's not helping.

And then there's Texas...  Texas grid asks residents to conserve power as heatwave hits.
Texas's embattled electrical grid operator warned residents to cut electricity use "as much as possible" for the rest of this week, as several days of heat over 90 degrees Fahrenheit (32°C), combined with generation outages, could strain the grid even before summer officially starts.

ERCOT was "supposed to have enough reserves to meet peak demand this summer, yet here we are in mid June with the first bout of high temperatures and they are already seeking conservation," said Matt Smith, director of commodity research at ClipperData, a provider of commodities data and analytics.
"It does not bode well for the months ahead," Smith said.
Adding more wind, or more power lines to move unreliable wind around the state, isn't a long-term solution to this problem.  This is what happens when states rely on unreliable renewables. 

Thanks to federal subsidies for renewables that artificially make renewables the cheapest power out there, unsubsidized baseload fossil fuel power that can run when called is priced out of market and closed.  It's no secret that our federal government wants to force all fossil fuel electricity generators to close.  When they do, the entire country is going to be in the same boat as California and Texas.

It is suggested that spending trillions on new transmission for these unreliable renewables will be able to fill in the gaps by importing/exporting enormous amounts of electricity around the country.  It relies on the presumption that wind or solar will be producing in excess somewhere.  This only works on paper, or in some wacky computer simulation where renewable production is averaged out to a set percentage of full capacity.  Except it doesn't actually work that way.  When renewables are not producing, there is no power.  Presuming that your neighbors have enough excess to power your entire state is a fool's paradise during widespread weather events... or the roughly 12 hours per day when the sun isn't shining.  We simply don't have the technology to build enough batteries that can carry urban loads for any sustained period.

If we build some supergrid that sucks power from other regions to feed places like California, what are the other regions going to use to power their own towns?  Who makes the determination of power priority?  Will it be the federal government, making political decisions for the party that's in power?  Will rural America turn into a power-producing serfdom for the big cities that is blacked out first?  We're heading for disaster.  Why won't politicians listen to reliability experts like NERC?  Whatever happened to "science?"
1 Comment

Knock, Knock, Karma Calling

6/12/2021

1 Comment

 
There are many days when I wake up, scan the news, and say, "I just couldn't make this stuff up if I tried!"  This morning I was asked why it sounded like the Wicked Witch of the West lived here.
Hacking Gang Threatens to Leak Billionaire's "Spicy" Secrets -- Chicago-based Invenergy vowed that it would not capitulate and pay cybercriminals...
There's an undeniable certainty in the world -- if you spew evil into the world, it's going to come back on you like a tidal wave.  You'll never know when, you'll never know how, but it will happen.  Always be a good person, even when no one is watching.

Details of the hack are available on Financial Times this morning, and say that Invenergy's system was "compromised" by Russian hackers REvil and that the hackers are in possession of information on projects and contracts, as well as personal emails and compromising photos of company founder Michael Polsky.  The hackers threaten to reveal this information if the ransom is not paid.  Invenergy says it will not pay the ransom.

Does Missouri really want to allow a company so easily hacked and extorted to connect to its electric grid?  Who would want to become a customer of a company like that?

And how long before Invenergy is embroiled in scandal when it doesn't pay?  Hang on to your hat... it may be a rough ride!
1 Comment

Globalism and Electricity:  Taking Over the World

6/9/2021

3 Comments

 
Ever since President Xi Jinping pitched the idea of a “global energy internet” to the United Nations six years ago, China’s been trying to persuade the world to build the high voltage highways that would form its backbone. That plan to wrap the planet in a web of intercontinental, made-in-Beijing power lines has gone pretty much nowhere. Yet the fortunes of so-called supergrids appear to be turning, if not on quite the spectacular, Bond-villain scale Xi first envisaged.
What could go wrong?  What could go wrong with a global electric grid powered by unreliable wind and solar electricity?  What are the chances that some country that's still building fossil fuel generators would jack up the global grid and then disconnect itself and rely on its alternative resources to take over a paralyzed, powerless world?
This is absolute madness being pushed by an increasingly bold mainstream media owned by the elite with a global agenda.  It's the elite, rich and powerful, vs. the rest of us.  The Have-Way-Too-Much vs. the Have-Nots.

Take a look at this proposed map of the new global grid.
Picture
Let's focus in on the U.S.:
Picture
In addition to the green and blue lines, there's also a network of black and red lines across the continental U.S.  What are those?
Picture
How close does that come to this?
Picture
That's a map of a proposed "overlay" high voltage transmission grid that's been bumping along unbuilt for years.  First it was for coal, now it's for renewables.

It also looks a lot like this more recent version used by "Breakthrough Energy's" front groups, ACORE and ACEG, to illustrate their "Macrogrid Initiative."
Picture
What's The Macrogrid Initiative?  It's a group of global elite billionaires who want to invest in a new electric transmission "overlay" grid.  These billionaires think they know more about the power grid than professionals.  It includes characters such as Bill Gates, Michael Bloomberg,* Jeff Bezos, a couple of Chinese Billionaires, and a selected elite from around the globe.

Ya know, they say New World Order is a conspiracy theory, just like a lot of things poo-poo'd by the media lately as conspiracy theories that later turned out to be true.  The media merely covered them up because they didn't fit the desired narrative.  Ditto with believing that The Great Reset is an elite takeover.  But if you google Bill Gates + either of these "conspiracies" there's plenty to read that doesn't sound quite as crackpot as it used to.

What are the chances that the Chinese independently came up with a macrogrid idea at the same time as Bill Gates?  That making electricity bigger and costlier and centrally controlled isn't a plan to take over the world like Dr. Evil?  What's the one thing in the world our society can't do without?  Electricity.

Why is our Big Government so obsessed with centralized renewables and Big Transmission?  Why is democratic energy, such as microgrids, home generators, and distributed generation being squashed?  We could sit here all day and ask these rhetorical questions.  Is there really no such thing as coincidence?
*Must be a real coincidence that this crazy story about a global power grid was published by Bloomberg, right?
3 Comments

Macropropaganda

6/1/2021

1 Comment

 
Picture
It's a new word for the bloviating nonsense spewed by Bill Gates' Macrogrid Initiative.

Bill Gates became rich selling crappy computer technology that enslaved the vast majority.  Now he thinks he's an expert on absolutely everything and dreams of taking over the world and remaking it to his own liking.  Money doesn't equal intelligence.  The only ones buying his schtick are the ones Bill is buying to carry it out.  The ordinary man is not impressed.  In fact, the ordinary man is positively revolted by the rich and powerful dictating every aspect of his life and finances.  The ordinary man will dig in his heels and oppose Bill's brain farts simply on general principles.  Bill's energy vision is no different.

Bill gathered all the best dreamers and schemers he could buy to sell his vision of top down big energy to the new Big Government bureaucrats hungry for power and prestige.  Obviously Bill isn't interested in selling his plan to the masses.  Perhaps he thinks that his Big Government can be used to stomp on the masses and drag them into an increasingly expensive and unreliable energy future controlled by the global elite?

Sorry, we're not on board.  In fact, we're going to fight, kick and scream the whole way.  And we're going to keep speaking truth to power until we get our way.

Big Government agency U.S. Department of Energy held a "summit" last week under the auspices of its ARPA-E program.  There, our Big Government "partnered" with Big Transmission and its bastard child "The Macrogrid Initiative" to tell us what we need "as a society."

The four words no for-profit industry should ever utter:
WE AS A SOCIETY
You're not part of our "society."  You have your own "society" of filthy rich folks who want to use us as a stepping stone to even more riches.  Any elite blowhard who utters these words is displaying his own arrogance.  It is SOCIETY that decides what we need "as a society," not elite dictators.  Saying these words guarantees that society will fight you tooth and nail.

And that's exactly what's going to happen to Bill's Macrogrid Initiative.  Having a dream to build a gigantic, new electric grid is one thing; getting there is another.  There's a fork in the road, and Bill and his cabal have veered off onto the wrong path.

Two options:

1.  Innovate new energy solutions that would be accepted by society.

2.  Use old energy solutions that are highly profitable and attempt to force them on society.

One path requires more money upfront but guarantees smooth sailing on the back end.  The other requires no effort in the beginning, but will flounder endlessly when rejected by society.  You'd think Bill would be smart enough to know the difference, but perhaps his arrogance gets in the way?

The only way we as a society are going to allow an energy transition is if it does not impact the sanctity of our homes and empty our wallets.  Otherwise, get ready for eternal, entrenched opposition from society.  We're not docile sheep, in fact you're probably going to be surprised by the virulence we can muster when threatened.
The panelists agreed that regulatory entities will need to alter their policies to accelerate transmission projects and facilitate their interconnection to the grid.
Alter regulation to increase your profits and decrease society's rights?  I don't think so.  In fact, you might even get surprised by some regulatory virulence if you keep trying to stuff your arrogant ideas down that pipe.

Regulation is for benefit of society.  It's not for the purpose of increasing utility power and profits.  Regulators serve ME, not YOU.  We as a society have created a regulatory paradigm that cannot be dismantled or it will cease to exist and become nothing more than a political-corporate dictatorship that does not protect consumers.  Regulation was formed to protect consumers from corporations, not the other way around.  Are we going to need regulators to protect us from the regulators?  Or are we going to need a revolution?

It's not that great a stretch these days for the people to disconnect from the bloated energy bureaucracy and make their own energy.  What good is a kingdom with no subjects?

Game on, Bill!
Picture
1 Comment

Becoming Transmission Woke

6/1/2021

0 Comments

 
In a recent article in NPR, a spokeswoman for Cardinal Hickory Creek transmission line accuses the Environmental Law and Policy Center of being "contradictory."  Strip away all the weasel words and she says that they're hypocrites.  If the ELPC supports "clean energy" it must also support Big Transmission.

After years of supporting Big Transmission like Clean Line Energy Partners, ELPC got transmission woke when a Big Transmission project "for renewables" got sited in its own backyard.  This is undeniable reality:  People don't like renewables when infrastructure to support it gets sited in their own backyard.

ELPC's wokeism spurred an organizational change to supporting "no wires alternatives", such as advanced transmission technology that makes better use of existing transmission.  ELPC still supports "clean energy", but it does so while recognizing the environmental damage caused by Big Transmission.  Is this hypocrisy?  Or the beginning of a sensible new trend where big green becomes transmission woke?

Big Transmission as the solution to "climate change" is headed towards oblivion.  The more gigantic projects they dream up, the better the odds that one of them will get dangerously close to the places environmental groups hold dear.  Already, having an environmental hypocrite like ELPC in their nest is causing great concern.  The wokeism is only going to spread, because once you get transmission woke, there's simply no going back.  Landowners will NEVER change their minds and welcome new overhead transmission for renewables.  No matter what the transmission profiteers propose, and no matter how much OPM* (Other People's Money) they spend "incentivizing"** transmission, they are simply spinning their wheels.  Opposition will continue, and increase, including opposition from environmental groups.

NPR says that Cardinal Hickory Creek is in trouble, and the trouble is coming from ELPC, the only party with the resources to drag it through the courts.  Bravo!  However, it also demonstrates one of the foundational tenets of transmission opposition, "the enemy of my enemy is my friend."  For years, big green fought against transmission when they thought it was "for coal."  Now that it's supposed to be "for renewables", big green loves transmission.  Is this hypocritical?  You bet'cha!  ELPC demonstrates that it isn't about transmission at all, but about environmentalism.  Isn't it time that big green goes back to its roots and stops being a well-funded patsy for an increasingly greedy energy industry?  See tenet above.  A landowner is likely to get whiplash from the changing transmission policies of big green.

Environmental groups in New England are at war against each other over the Big Transmission project New England Clean Energy Connect.   ELPC is not alone, the wokeism is blossoming, along with the finger pointing and claims of hypocrisy.

Why does this swirling sea of transmission frenemies matter?  Because it further degrades the pedestal of moral superiority to which Big Transmission has ascended by making it murkier and less trusted.  Landowners have long been suspicious of the regulatory process that approves or denies Big Transmission.  Is it really about transmission being needed, or is it simply about buying influence and political support?

A Wisconsin judge summed it up recently when ruling on a claim of bias by the state PSC in the Cardinal Hickory Creek approval:
“(I)t is essential to our democratic system, to our design of government, that we maintain the process as fair in appearance and in practice,” Frost wrote. “At least then the disappointment of the losing party is in having lost, not in being cheated by an unfair process or decision maker. Disappointment is acceptable. Distrust is dangerous.”
Wise words that should be applied universally these days.  We all know what you're doing behind closed doors and we simply don't trust you.
*Financial incentives, loan guarantees, and tax credits paid for by taxpayers.
**This is not a word.  Incentive is a noun, not a verb. 

0 Comments
<<Previous
Forward>>

    About the Author

    Keryn Newman blogs here at StopPATH WV about energy issues, transmission policy, misguided regulation, our greedy energy companies and their corporate spin.
    In 2008, AEP & Allegheny Energy's PATH joint venture used their transmission line routing etch-a-sketch to draw a 765kV line across the street from her house. Oooops! And the rest is history.

    About
    StopPATH Blog

    StopPATH Blog began as a forum for information and opinion about the PATH transmission project.  The PATH project was abandoned in 2012, however, this blog was not.

    StopPATH Blog continues to bring you energy policy news and opinion from a consumer's point of view.  If it's sometimes snarky and oftentimes irreverent, just remember that the truth isn't pretty.  People come here because they want the truth, instead of the usual dreadful lies this industry continues to tell itself.  If you keep reading, I'll keep writing.


    Need help opposing unneeded transmission?
    Email me


    Search This Site

    Got something to say?  Submit your own opinion for publication.

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010

    Categories

    All
    $$$$$$
    2023 PJM Transmission
    Aep Vs Firstenergy
    Arkansas
    Best Practices
    Best Practices
    Big Winds Big Lie
    Can Of Worms
    Carolinas
    Citizen Action
    Colorado
    Corporate Propaganda
    Data Centers
    Democracy Failures
    DOE Failure
    Emf
    Eminent Domain
    Events
    Ferc Action
    FERC Incentives Part Deux
    Ferc Transmission Noi
    Firstenergy Failure
    Good Ideas
    Illinois
    Iowa
    Kansas
    Land Agents
    Legislative Action
    Marketing To Mayberry
    MARL
    Missouri
    Mtstorm Doubs Rebuild
    Mtstormdoubs Rebuild
    New Jersey
    New Mexico
    Newslinks
    NIETC
    Opinion
    Path Alternatives
    Path Failures
    Path Intimidation Attempts
    Pay To Play
    Potomac Edison Investigation
    Power Company Propaganda
    Psc Failure
    Rates
    Regulatory Capture
    Skelly Fail
    The Pjm Cartel
    Top Ten Clean Line Mistakes
    Transource
    Valley Link Transmission
    Washington
    West Virginia
    Wind Catcher
    Wisconsin

Copyright 2010 StopPATH WV, Inc.