StopPATH WV
  • News
  • StopPATH WV Blog
  • FAQ
  • Events
  • Fundraisers
  • Make a Donation
  • Landowner Resources
  • About PATH
  • Get Involved
  • Commercials
  • Links
  • About Us
  • Contact

Appalachian Power and the WV PSC's 2012 Rate Increase That Wasn't

7/29/2012

3 Comments

 
Appalachian Power and the West Virginia Public Service Commission are attempting to pull a fast one on the utility's customers in the state.

Last week's news headlines trumpeted, "PSC issues order to keep AEP electric rates from rising,"  and the PSC issued a press release titled, "PSC Maintains Current Level for Electric Rates."  Nothing could be further from the truth!  However, APCo and the PSC think you ratepayers are dumb and easily fooled by their semantics games.  A review of the PSC's order in the case reveals that the claims of "no rate increases" are nothing but smoke and mirrors, and here's why:

1.    The "current rates" that are being "maintained" are the product of a series of rate increases over the past four years that were supposed to pay down a huge unrecovered fuel cost balance from 2008 and 2009.  These higher rates were supposed to be temporary increases granted to pay off a debt to the company.  However, APCo has continued to overspend, and at the end of the temporary rate increase period no substantial amount of old debt has been retired, or paid, by these increased rates!  Therefore, the 2008 and 2009 balance owed to APCo by ratepayers remains, and now has $25M in carrying costs (interest) tacked on to it!  Here's how the PSC describes it in their order: 

"Over the past several years, the APCo/WPCo customer rates have increased significantly primarily because of the increased costs to acquire fuel (coal) for power
generation and expenditures to meet more stringent environmental regulations. The 2012 ENEC filing was intended to be the last year of a four-year phase-in rate plan approved in Appalachian Power Co. & Wheeling Power Co., Case No. 09-0177-E-GI (Order dated September 30,2009) (2009 ENEC).

In the 2009 ENEC proceeding, the Companies filed for the largest rate increase ever requested by a utility in the State. That filing related to the energy cost increases
experienced in 2008 and 2009. In the 2009 ENEC, the Commission authorized a four-year phase-in plan of a $366.7 million rate increase, with the first ENEC increase of approximately $106.6 million, or a 10.5 percent increase in overall rates, and an $18.1 million Construction and Post-construction surcharge increase."


2.    APCo didn't ask for, and the Commission didn't approve, an additional ENEC rate increase because the company, the PSC, and the legislature are trying to avoid your scrutiny and anger over another huge rate increase.  These entities passed legislation this year that allows them to simply hide the huge rate increase necessary to pull their feet out of the fire.  They are hiding the gigantic rate increase by mortgaging it in your name over a 10 year period and tossing words and ideas around that they are hoping will confuse you.  "Securitization," or the "selling of bonds," is nothing more than the company taking out a mortgage and sticking you with the payments and interest.  APCo is tired of carrying this huge unrecovered balance.  If they "sell bonds" it means they take the cash from the mortgage loan, and the obligation to repay belongs to ratepayers.  This is a rate increase you will be paying over the next ten years, with interest.  APCo has tossed all its debt, both historical and current, into the amount of the rate mortgage that they will be applying for soon.  There is no rate increase simply because the actual rate increase will be a separate "securitization" case that is expected to be filed in the next couple of weeks.  The PSC took no action to "keep rates from rising," they simply deferred the huge rate increase to another case.  Parent company AEP stated in a recent presentation to their investors that the amount of the West Virginia rate increase will be $400M.

3.    Let's talk about utility "deferrals."  When the utility spends money that they are unable to recover through current rates, they "defer" it by creating a regulatory asset in their accounting system.  This debt belongs to the ratepayers, and at some point, the utility will ask the PSC for permission to recover it from you through a future rate increase.  APCo plans to clean up all outstanding deferrals on its books through "securitization" and transfer all that debt to ratepayers.  APCo also plans to put you right back into debt by "deferring" $56M of recent storm restoration costs.  You will pay for this "deferral" later.  APCo "deferred" its gigantic fuel cost increase from 2008 & 2009, and the cost of certain deals for lower rates it made with certain industrial customers in prior rate cases (such as Century Aluminum).  When APCo negotiates a lower rate for certain big electric users, they are not absorbing the discount.  They simply book the difference between their cost and the lower rate that these customers pay as a "deferral."  Now APCo wants you to pay for the discount other customers received in their bills in prior years.

"Deferrals" and "securitization" and the "selling of bonds" are not actions that cost APCo money.  They are debts that are incurred in your name by the utility, and they will all come due.  It's time for APCo customers to pay the piper, while the PSC and your state legislators hide behind big words and accounting mumbo-jumbo and try to trick you into believing that there will be no rate increases.
3 Comments
bh link
7/29/2012 08:11:21 am

It was ridiculous that reporters in both the Charleston Gazette and the Daily Mail read this recent PSC order and claimed that the only important fact to glean from it was that rates weren't going up.

That wasn't the point of the order at all. The PSC issued this as what it called an "interim order" to set some basic numbers in preparation for two other cases in the pipeline, namely the Century Aluminum hijacking of APCo rate payers and the APCo unrecovered coal cost securitization case.

This order was a housekeeping order, not any significant decision on electric rates. Because we no longer have regular beat reporters with some familiarity with the issues, reporters write stories without knowing anything about their subject matter. The result is the garbage that passes for "journalism" today.

Reply
Keryn
7/30/2012 12:50:46 am

Agreed! Mainstream media is nothing but a corporate mouthpiece.

I find it interesting how the industrial users got taken for a ride here. They were granted a negotiated 7.5% rate increase "cap" in a previous rate case, however, APCo was simply deferring their unpaid balance. Now APCo wants to recover the amount deferred. I'm sure the industrial users imagined that residential and other customers would end up absorbing and paying for their past electric usage when the deferral came due. But, it looks like APCo and the PSC plan to recover it from the customers who caused it. So, that "rate cap?" Yeah, now you simply get to pay the amount your originally owed... with interest! So, let's watch how the industrial users group tries to negotiate their way out of paying for their electric usage and dumping their past due balance on other rate classes ;-)

You can "defer" bills, but you can't make them go away!

Reply
Stock Market Advisory Services link
5/6/2014 08:02:19 pm

main issue is the rate concern in the market to gain the profit margin to be include for further investment in that nature as getting a good module.thanks

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    About the Author

    Keryn Newman blogs here at StopPATH WV about energy issues, transmission policy, misguided regulation, our greedy energy companies and their corporate spin.
    In 2008, AEP & Allegheny Energy's PATH joint venture used their transmission line routing etch-a-sketch to draw a 765kV line across the street from her house. Oooops! And the rest is history.

    About
    StopPATH Blog

    StopPATH Blog began as a forum for information and opinion about the PATH transmission project.  The PATH project was abandoned in 2012, however, this blog was not.

    StopPATH Blog continues to bring you energy policy news and opinion from a consumer's point of view.  If it's sometimes snarky and oftentimes irreverent, just remember that the truth isn't pretty.  People come here because they want the truth, instead of the usual dreadful lies this industry continues to tell itself.  If you keep reading, I'll keep writing.


    Need help opposing unneeded transmission?
    Email me


    Search This Site

    Got something to say?  Submit your own opinion for publication.

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010

    Categories

    All
    $$$$$$
    2023 PJM Transmission
    Aep Vs Firstenergy
    Arkansas
    Best Practices
    Best Practices
    Big Winds Big Lie
    Can Of Worms
    Carolinas
    Citizen Action
    Colorado
    Corporate Propaganda
    Data Centers
    Democracy Failures
    DOE Failure
    Emf
    Eminent Domain
    Events
    Ferc Action
    FERC Incentives Part Deux
    Ferc Transmission Noi
    Firstenergy Failure
    Good Ideas
    Illinois
    Iowa
    Kansas
    Land Agents
    Legislative Action
    Marketing To Mayberry
    MARL
    Missouri
    Mtstorm Doubs Rebuild
    Mtstormdoubs Rebuild
    New Jersey
    New Mexico
    Newslinks
    NIETC
    Opinion
    Path Alternatives
    Path Failures
    Path Intimidation Attempts
    Pay To Play
    Potomac Edison Investigation
    Power Company Propaganda
    Psc Failure
    Rates
    Regulatory Capture
    Skelly Fail
    The Pjm Cartel
    Top Ten Clean Line Mistakes
    Transource
    Valley Link Transmission
    Washington
    West Virginia
    Wind Catcher
    Wisconsin

Copyright 2010 StopPATH WV, Inc.