StopPATH WV
  • News
  • StopPATH WV Blog
  • FAQ
  • Events
  • Fundraisers
  • Make a Donation
  • Landowner Resources
  • About PATH
  • Get Involved
  • Commercials
  • Links
  • About Us
  • Contact

Would My Purchase of Voluntary RECS Through "Green Power Programs" Like Arcadia Power Save the Planet?

11/23/2015

7 Comments

 
Lately, I've been bombarded with advertisements from a company named Arcadia Power that claims I can power my home with 100% clean energy, reduce my environmental impact and change the way America consumes its energy.  Those are some pretty big claims!  Can stock photos of children running through a field of golden grain showing (either real or photoshopped) wind turbines really save the planet?  Is this really a "community wind" program?  I was intrigued, so I peeled back the wrapper to see what was inside.
After all, the ad encourages me to "learn more," doesn't it?  The first place I started "learning more" was by clicking the ad to end up at Arcadia Power's Facebook page.  I asked them where they sourced their renewable energy certificates (or RECs) and how much they paid.  After all, I'd like to know what renewable energy projects I'm supporting, and what the mark-up is on the product Arcadia buys and re-sells to consumers.  In answer to my question, Arcadia told me I could find the answers to my questions on my "dashboard."  But, I don't have a dashboard.  In order to get one, I'd have to sign up as a customer of Arcadia.  That sort of defeats the idea of caveat emptor, right?  So, I asked more questions.  And what did I get for my trouble?  Arcadia not only refused to respond to my questions, they also removed or hid them from view and banned me from any further postings on its Facebook page.  I guess they have decided they don't want me as a customer.  Go ahead, check Arcadia's Facebook page out.  Be sure to click to see all the comments on its postings -- you can't see them!  The vast majority are hidden from public view.  I'm guessing I'm not the only one who asked questions Arcadia would rather remain unasked.  And, right there, I lost all faith in this company and its promises.  But, never fear, I'm quite capable of educating myself to get the answers Arcadia refused to give me.  And Arcadia's rudeness and evasiveness gave me the warm fuzzies that further fueled my curiosity!
So, what does Arcadia propose to sell me?
Arcadia Power will buy renewable energy to match your usage, ensuring that an equal amount of clean energy is getting on the power grid.
Arcadia Power buys renewable energy?  Or do they merely buy renewable energy certificates?
...we buy Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) on behalf of residential and business customers, and sometimes we source our own RECs from projects we directly invest in.
Oh, so Arcadia doesn't really buy renewable energy.  It's not an electric company.  It buys RECs and resells them to consumers as a way to feel good about offsetting my carbon footprint.

But, does it work?

First, I needed to understand what RECs are.  A REC represents the social and environmental benefits of a megawatt hour (MWh) of clean electricity generated.  It does not represent the actual energy generated.  A clean energy generator has two income streams derived from production of clean energy.  One income stream comes from the actual energy produced, which is sold to users on the grid.  A second income stream is derived from the sale of RECs.  RECs can be sold either bundled with the actual electricity produced, or unbundled from the electricity and sold separately.  So, if a company like Arcadia tells me that I'm using the clean energy represented by the unbundled REC, am I really?    Didn't someone else purchase and use the actual clean energy produced, without spending additional money to buy the associated REC?  I learned that RECs aren't really energy at all.

Why is there any market for created products like RECs?  Because utilities are required by law in many states to make sure a certain percentage of the power they purchase for their customers comes from alternative sources.  These individual state laws are called Renewable Portfolio Standards, and every state has its own unique version.  A utility can meet its state RPS requirement by purchasing RECs.  Ahh.... so now I've found the purpose of RECs!  So a utility doesn't really have to purchase alternative energy to meet state RPS requirements, it can simply purchase the "social and environmental benefits" of alternative energy?  Well, sort of.  Many states put some sort of qualifiers on what RECs count towards RPS compliance.  Certain types of generators, certain locations for generation.  Many states contain a requirement that some or all RECs purchased for compliance must come from sources in the state, in the region, or physically able to be used by the utility taking the credit.  Apparently this is what causes unbundling of RECs from the actual energy produced.  A utility is only going to buy those RECs it needs for compliance.  Therefore, the RECs necessary for compliance in any given state or region are the most valuable.  After that, the value of the REC can decrease sharply, because nobody needs to purchase it. 

Not all RECs are created equal.  In a state with substantial renewable/alternative energy supply, there will be many more RECs created than needed for RPS compliance.  There's no real market for these RECs after utilities purchase what they need for compliance.  Therefore, they end up in the "voluntary" REC market, where entities purchase them for the right to say they "use 100% clean energy."  The intent is that one KWh of dirty electricity used is offset by one KWh of clean electricity generated somewhere else in the world.  Some experts contend that this is just wishful thinking and that voluntary REC purchases are nothing but "green washing."
RECs are not offsets and the voluntary green power market does not reduce emissions from electricity generation.

The problem is that green power markets, as currently structured, cannot achieve this goal. They were created on a fundamentally flawed foundation—that buying a virtual attribute can substitute for physically consuming a specific good or service. Further, the incentives of the participants in green power markets—power companies selling RECs, intermediaries marketing them, organizations certifying them, and companies buying them—are aligned, leaving no one with a strong interest in questioning the claims being made.

With these concerns in mind, we are challenging everyone to question their own assumptions about voluntary green power markets.
That also seems to be the conclusion reached by this expert:
Nonetheless, claims that voluntary RECs reduce carbon emissions are highly suspect. Their direct effect is not to reduce net emissions, but to shift responsibility for emissions between parties. They only reduce net emissions, if at all, indirectly, by demonstrating demand for clean energy and by providing a modest boost in revenue to the clean electricity industry.

It's weak tea. Buy voluntary RECs if you like, they're cheap as hell, but have no illusions that by doing so you are offsetting your emissions. It's like tossing your supermarket change into a Unicef jar. Whatever, it's better than not doing so, but you're not "curing poverty."
This article talks about "additionality," which is roughly described as the income stream flowing to the generator from the sale of RECs.  If the RECs are good quality RECs needed by utilities for compliance, or bundled with the electricity as part of a PPA, then the RECs provide some real value that could help that particular generator be financed and built.  However, if the RECs produced by a generator are unbundled voluntary junk RECs that are now selling as low as a buck or two, then the sale of RECs doesn't add the "additionality" that provides a significant income stream to the generator.  If you're buying cheap RECs in the voluntary market, you're buying junk that doesn't do a thing to offset your carbon footprint or increase the use of renewables.

So, voluntary junk RECs in oversupplied markets are selling for a buck?  Some Texas utilities are giving away free electricity, too, in order to deal with the glut of wind energy produced in the state that peaks at night, when electricity use is lowest. 

If an unbundled REC can be purchased for a buck, how much is a company like Arcadia charging to resell it to consumers like me? 
We offer a flat-price premium of $0.015 per kWh for 100% Wind Energy in all states except for Oregon and Washington state.
One REC equals 1 MWh of electricity.  It takes 1,000 kWhs to equal 1 MWh.  Therefore, Arcadia is charging a flat rate of $15 per REC.  If Arcadia is buying voluntary RECs for one dollar each, then the company is adding a huge markup by reselling them to you and me.  Since Arcadia couldn't or wouldn't answer questions about where it sources its RECs and how much it pays, then I have to assume they are buying the cheapest unbundled RECs they can find from places very far from my east coast home.

I can come to no other conclusion than to think that this scheme sounds like something P.T. Barnum would sell at a trashy carnival.  Somebody's getting rich somewhere, and it's not the generator.  I don't want to increase my electric bill by any unnecessary amount, so I won't be signing up for Arcadia Power.  They can quit bombarding me with advertisements now.  Decision's made.

But here's the part that really, really concerns me:
Arcadia Power pays your local utility directly and provides you with a consolidated statement each month that combines your local utility charges with your clean energy from them.

Arcadia Power simplifies your life by providing every customer with automatic billing – either with a credit card or direct debit from your checking account. We provide you with an easy-to-read e-statement every month and you never have to worry about missing a payment!
Arcadia will somehow take over your regulated electric bill and you will no longer receive a bill from your electric provider (don't worry though, I'm sure you'll continue to receive those exciting offers for Exterior Electrical Wiring Protection Plans from HomeServe.)  So you will no longer know how much electricity you use, when your meter was read, how many days are in your billing cycle, or receive notification about rate increases and other information from your provider.  Instead you'll get a "consolidated" monthly bill from an unregulated company.  If you have a billing dispute with Arcadia, your public service commission can't help you.  What happens when you have a dispute with the amount your electric company bills you, such as when they neglect to read your electric meter for years on end and then send you a "catch-up" bill totaling thousands of dollars?  Arcadia pays your bill for you each month and then automatically deducts that amount from your credit or debit card, without your authorization.  While you could dispute an outrageous bill directly with the power company and set up a payment plan, you lose that privilege once you sign up for Arcadia Power.  Your electric company bills.  Arcadia pays.  Then you pay.   Is Arcadia marking up your local electric bill, too?  This loss of control of a regulated service makes me very, very nervous.  We'll have to see what happens when unregulated companies insert themselves between regulated entities and the consumers they are required to serve by law.  I'm sure there are plenty of unique state electricity tariff provisions related to billing that can be violated by an unregulated entity like Arcadia Power. 

Do educate yourself before allowing your carbon footprint guilt to toss spare change in the climate change Unicef jar each month in order to save your soul.  Make sure your clean energy dollars aren't going to buy P.T.
Barnum a yacht and his own, private island in the Caribbean.

7 Comments
Sandra Beall
12/10/2015 07:39:00 am

Thank you so much for thoroughly explaining the whole REC stuff etc. I'm with you and will not be rolling with Arcadia. I want to know how much electricity I am using each month etc. before someone is just happily debiting from my checking account.

Reply
Richard S. Forte link
1/29/2016 02:13:37 am

Powering and heating your home with clean energy sources sounds very easy when it comes to going green, but deciding which kind of fuel is right isn't as simple. Solar power? Wind power? Hydropower? Geothermal power?--active or passive? It's overwhelming--and it's enough to stop you before you even get started. For suggestions please visit www.gaslicht.com

Reply
Linda Hillman
3/19/2016 03:07:22 pm

Thank you for helping me to evaluate an offer from League of Conservation Voters to buy "clean energy" from Arcadia Power. I sent a copy of your article to Maggie Burns, Director of Member Programs for LCV, and told her I expected better from LCV.

Reply
Storm
7/22/2016 12:58:09 pm

I would just like to know on average how much peoples bill changed when they started using Arcadia power.i can't get a informed answer or any answer

Reply
Keryn
7/22/2016 05:52:59 pm

Welcome to the club, Storm! Arcadia Power doesn't answer questions like that. I wonder what they're hiding? They're not hiding the fact that they're just a middle man profiting from peddling illusory "social and environmental attributes." The only thing they do is mark up renewable energy credits and collect cash.

Reply
Marcus
12/3/2016 04:23:44 pm

I think Arcadia is legit. $0.015 per kWH seems to be the going rate for RECs. http://www.arcadiapower.com/faq. If your utility company doesn't offer RECs directly it is a good option.

That being said even though Arcadia offers $0.012 for VA, I'm going to instead utilize the my utility company Appalachian Power green pricing plan (RECs) at $0.015. https://www.appalachianpower.com/account/bills/manage/GreenPricing.aspx?state=VA. It just seems simpler to not involve a second company.

Reply
travis
7/24/2018 07:07:02 pm

The .015 per kwh is a premium ADDED on to your bill for using 100% wind. I can not find the ACTUAL kwh charge any where on Arcadia sign up page. It does sa that wind is MORE expensive .If it was ONLY .015 per kwh my 3000 sq ft home monthly average bill @2200 kwh per mont would be$33 ??? No thats the added premium they ADD ON to your monthly bill for choosing 100% wind energy???? They do have a calculator that has a square foot calculation and if that is correct my monthly bill would go from $200 per month to $286 per month and i do not think that includes the $.015 per kwh premium on the 100% wind usage. So dont let that .015 rate fool you into your monthly cost ITS AN ADD ON .

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    About the Author

    Keryn Newman blogs here at StopPATH WV about energy issues, transmission policy, misguided regulation, our greedy energy companies and their corporate spin.
    In 2008, AEP & Allegheny Energy's PATH joint venture used their transmission line routing etch-a-sketch to draw a 765kV line across the street from her house. Oooops! And the rest is history.

    About
    StopPATH Blog

    StopPATH Blog began as a forum for information and opinion about the PATH transmission project.  The PATH project was abandoned in 2012, however, this blog was not.

    StopPATH Blog continues to bring you energy policy news and opinion from a consumer's point of view.  If it's sometimes snarky and oftentimes irreverent, just remember that the truth isn't pretty.  People come here because they want the truth, instead of the usual dreadful lies this industry continues to tell itself.  If you keep reading, I'll keep writing.


    Need help opposing unneeded transmission?
    Email me


    Search This Site

    Got something to say?  Submit your own opinion for publication.

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010

    Categories

    All
    $$$$$$
    2023 PJM Transmission
    Aep Vs Firstenergy
    Arkansas
    Best Practices
    Best Practices
    Big Winds Big Lie
    Can Of Worms
    Carolinas
    Citizen Action
    Colorado
    Corporate Propaganda
    Data Centers
    Democracy Failures
    DOE Failure
    Emf
    Eminent Domain
    Events
    Ferc Action
    FERC Incentives Part Deux
    Ferc Transmission Noi
    Firstenergy Failure
    Good Ideas
    Illinois
    Iowa
    Kansas
    Land Agents
    Legislative Action
    Marketing To Mayberry
    MARL
    Missouri
    Mtstorm Doubs Rebuild
    Mtstormdoubs Rebuild
    New Jersey
    New Mexico
    Newslinks
    NIETC
    Opinion
    Path Alternatives
    Path Failures
    Path Intimidation Attempts
    Pay To Play
    Potomac Edison Investigation
    Power Company Propaganda
    Psc Failure
    Rates
    Regulatory Capture
    Skelly Fail
    The Pjm Cartel
    Top Ten Clean Line Mistakes
    Transource
    Washington
    West Virginia
    Wind Catcher
    Wisconsin

Copyright 2010 StopPATH WV, Inc.