But that's not the stinkiest part. The propaganda oozing from this article claims:
The fact these long-in-the-works projects are reaching similar milestones appears to be coincidence; no single policy is moving them forward. They are, however, advancing at a time of increasing understanding by local communities and even traditional opponents — including some conservation groups — of the need to move clean energy from rural outposts and to build more durable electric systems after a series of weather and climatic events have felled grids in recent years.
Nobody affected by new above-ground transmission rights-of-way taken under threat of eminent domain "understands" this idiocy. That's a bold-faced LIE designed to make the hoi polloi believe that you don't mind being thrown under the wheels of the "clean energy" bus that they're driving so that they can all cheer about how they have saved the planet (that was never in any actual danger). This is gas lighting. This is mainstream media propaganda.
These reporters also doesn't realize that what has "felled grids" in recent years is the retirement of baseload coal and gas electric generators and a failing attempt to replace them with intermittent industrial wind and solar generators. It's not the weather. It's the generation sources. See how they did that? "Not enough power? Build more wind and solar and transmission lines!" When their agenda causes a problem, they pretend you need to continue with their agenda to solve the problem that's being created. They are doubling-down on the cause of the problem instead of finding a solution. What is it going to take to stop this craziness? Do we have to wait for these low-information fools to crash the grid?
Tell the reporters they are quite mistaken in their unsupported presumption. We do care and we will continue to resist.