StopPATH WV
  • News
  • StopPATH WV Blog
  • FAQ
  • Events
  • Fundraisers
  • Make a Donation
  • Landowner Resources
  • About PATH
  • Get Involved
  • Commercials
  • Links
  • About Us
  • Contact

Does TVA Not Love Clean Line Energy Partners the Right Way?

2/23/2014

10 Comments

 
They're not alone!  Although Clean Line Energy Partners keeps touting some "desperate need" for its transmission projects by unnamed "states farther east," the company has yet to produce any evidence of any future customers for its transmission projects.

In the case of its Plains & Eastern Clean Line, a
recent article tells us "TVA still has no deal to buy Clean Line's wind energy."  The article makes an important distinction that Clean Line hopes everyone will ignore:
TVA is in final negotiations to allow a proposed $2 billion transmission line carrying wind power 700 miles from Oklahoma to connect to TVA's grid near Millington.

However, it will be another issue entirely whether Texas-based Plains & Eastern Clean Line LLC can send its wind-generated electricity into the TVA system, TVA spokesman Chris Stanley said Tuesday.

TVA policy requires the federal utility, which supplies electricity to MLGW in Memphis, only buy power priced competitively with other energy sources.

No consumer prices have been disclosed by the Houston firm.

"Inter-connectivity just allows Clean Line, in this case, to connect to our grid," Stanley said. "They do not, however, have the ability to inject any power into our system."

TVA is now waiting on Clean Line to request a "transmission study," he said.

"We had to do studies and make sure we have system reliability. That's all happened and we're in final negotiations with them about what that looks like going forward,'' Stanley said.

After the interconnection study is completed, a the transmission-service study will look at sending wind power into the electric grid.
Looks like Clean Line's much ballyhooed Memorandum of Understanding with TVA isn't proof that the TVA is willing to buy power from the project after all.

Clean Line has been pulling this same scheme with all of its transmission projects by pretending that there are some potential customers in "desperate need" of power supplied by the project, or that a regional grid operator, or federal entity like the TVA, has "approved" its project or contracts to purchase the electricity.  Nothing could be further from the truth!  The interconnection studies simply determine whether or not Clean Line would compromise system reliability if they interconnected, and also determine what alterations need to be made to the system to accommodate Clean Line's interconnection.  Clean Line is responsible for the costs of the studies and any system upgrades determined to be needed in the studies.

Clean Line is in a catch-22.  They can't negotiate prices for their transmission capacity until they have completed all permitting, siting, land acquisition, engineering, contracting, etc., and know exactly how much their project will cost to build.  The cost of the project will inform the amount of the capacity charge.  The capacity charge will be added to the price of the wind (or other) generation and then a power purchase agreement will be negotiated between the generator and the utility buying the power.  The generators don't exist.  The customers don't exist.  The transmission project doesn't exist.  Clean Line is nothing more than an overly-ambitious and fantastical business plan.  I don't believe it will ever happen.

But as long as Clean Line's "patient" investors want to continue to dump money down this rat hole, entities like TVA will continue to take their money and produce "studies".... because they have to.  State utility commissions also have to entertain Clean Line's permit applications, but they don't have to approve them.  And they certainly don't have to grant such a speculative venture utility status and its attendant power of eminent domain.

The TVA is currently working on its integrated resource plan (IRP).  An IRP is a long-range plan by a utility to determine the proper mix of resources that will serve its customers reliably and economically in the future.  The IRP will determine whether TVA will purchase huge quantities of wind from Oklahoma.  TVA's IRP won't be completed until 2015.  Although one of the stakeholder participants in the process recently asked the question, "Would it be appropriate to consider a scenario around grid/transmission expansion - for example, an HVDC line is built from the Midwest making lower cost wind energy available to the TVA?" it looks like this question was batted aside by the group think of the TVA's IRP process. 

Maybe Clean Line needs to do a little reading on the Delphi Technique?

It looks like Clean Line's business plan is nothing but a house of cards, and a big wind is starting to blow.
10 Comments
Block "Clean" Line link
2/23/2014 01:09:05 pm

Oh, but we have power points directly from the "Clean" Line that puts the power prices at about TWICE our cost today. Is it no wonder they won't disclose the real cost?

Reply
Suze
2/23/2014 09:57:19 pm

Because they keep hoping for a miracle... or the largesse of big Daddy government to contract to buy at an outrageous price? You know. stranger things have happened... Some people think the government is a gigantic public treasure chest, free for the taking...

Reply
Patience
2/23/2014 10:10:29 pm

Suze, I don't want the gubmint meddling in this - bad enough that Congress guaranteed an "incentive" ROE for regulated utilities, which turned transmission into profit centers for them (and basically eliminated risk, which is a crucial element of "free markets").

I can accept the concept of "merchant lines," but what Clean Line hopes to do is start as a merchant project, then morph somehow into a regulated project that locks in high returns - i.e., get the "best" of both world. And in neither world do landowners or ratepayers count for anything ...

Reply
Block RICL link
2/24/2014 01:35:43 am

But a PRIVATE company getting eminent domain for a PRIVATE venture is a breach of constitutional rights and a very, very scary path to start down.

Reply
Keryn
2/24/2014 01:58:10 am

You are so right, Block! Eminent domain for utilities has always been based on the premise that the project was needed for reliability purposes and has been verified by a formal planning process. However, new drivers such as economic or public policy goals have muddied the process. Clean Line takes it to a whole new level with their "merchant" projects that serve only Clean Line's financial purposes. And, now, utilities doing traditional business are finding it much, much harder to acquire ROW and build projects. That's what happens when you cheapen the process and let the hoodlums in.

Keryn
2/23/2014 10:27:55 pm

Which is precisely why I question TVA's willingness to get involved here as Clean Line's patsy. Yes, I get that they have to do the interconnection studies, but what's up with that MOU? It basically does nothing but give Clean Line the cover of saying "we've signed a MOU with TVA to purchase this electricity." (which isn't even the truth!)

After poking through their IRP powerpoint, I have faith that the TVA can rise from the ashes here.

Reply
Block "Clean" Line link
2/24/2014 01:38:48 am

Well, it's either rise from the ashes, or be named in a major, Midwest-wide class action suit for the improper, unconstitutional use of eminent domain.... obtained with a whole whopper-laden, list of buzz-word filled sales pitches that have not stood up to scrutiny UNDER OATH. (Illinois Commerce Commission Docket 12-0560.)

Reply
Scott Thorsen
2/24/2014 01:36:49 am

Interesting read. Looks to me like Clean Line Energy Partners want to build P&ECL and follow the same capacity charge model they are claiming for RICL.

TVA would be P&ECL only customer, accepting 100% the risk and 0% of the reward.

It amazes me the TVA buys wind energy all the up in my neighborhood. I see the windmills 5 days a week in Northern Illinois. With the TVA buying a good percentage of Illinois' wind energy, (a third of Illinois wind energy going to the TVA wouldn't surprise me) and over 1500 mw of wind, I can understand why Oklahoma wind plus transmission costs Could be non competitive in the TVA.

It sure looks like the TVA is going out of their way with the IRP to demonstrate a companding knowledge of all the options and variables. If P&ECL makes it, CLEP will have to demostrate they are the most economical option for adding 3,500 MW to the region.

Can the TVA demostrate they will need 3,500 MW's? The final IRP will be very interesting. It appears the TVA is taking this seriously.

Reply
Midwest Alliance of Transmission Opposition link
2/24/2014 02:28:53 am

Doesn't the wind blow, or the sun shine, or the tide turn in the South?

Reply
TVA OUTSIDER
2/24/2014 06:22:39 am

With the TVA closing 18 coal generation stations, it would seam to be difficult for the TVA to explain outsourcing those jobs to Oklahoma. If it can be shown that energy can be generated within the region at a competitive price with natural gas and unemployment is high enough, the people won't care about greenhouse gas emissions or "clean" energy created in Oklahoma.

That's a tough sell for Clean Line. If this was 2008, employment was high and trending upward, it would be easier for the TVA to justify this deal and explain to people why they are paying for this project outside their territory. This is not 2008. Unemployment is high. Energy demand is leveling off.

If the TVA even acknowledged this option at the IRPWG, how fast would it be shot down?

It will be interesting where this leads, but the TVA cannot complete this study, not mention wind for outside it's region or a Merchant Transmission Line, and sign on to pay for Clean Line's project.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    About the Author

    Keryn Newman blogs here at StopPATH WV about energy issues, transmission policy, misguided regulation, our greedy energy companies and their corporate spin.
    In 2008, AEP & Allegheny Energy's PATH joint venture used their transmission line routing etch-a-sketch to draw a 765kV line across the street from her house. Oooops! And the rest is history.

    About
    StopPATH Blog

    StopPATH Blog began as a forum for information and opinion about the PATH transmission project.  The PATH project was abandoned in 2012, however, this blog was not.

    StopPATH Blog continues to bring you energy policy news and opinion from a consumer's point of view.  If it's sometimes snarky and oftentimes irreverent, just remember that the truth isn't pretty.  People come here because they want the truth, instead of the usual dreadful lies this industry continues to tell itself.  If you keep reading, I'll keep writing.


    Need help opposing unneeded transmission?
    Email me


    Search This Site

    Got something to say?  Submit your own opinion for publication.

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010

    Categories

    All
    $$$$$$
    2023 PJM Transmission
    Aep Vs Firstenergy
    Arkansas
    Best Practices
    Best Practices
    Big Winds Big Lie
    Can Of Worms
    Carolinas
    Citizen Action
    Colorado
    Corporate Propaganda
    Data Centers
    Democracy Failures
    DOE Failure
    Emf
    Eminent Domain
    Events
    Ferc Action
    FERC Incentives Part Deux
    Ferc Transmission Noi
    Firstenergy Failure
    Good Ideas
    Illinois
    Iowa
    Kansas
    Land Agents
    Legislative Action
    Marketing To Mayberry
    MARL
    Missouri
    Mtstorm Doubs Rebuild
    Mtstormdoubs Rebuild
    New Jersey
    New Mexico
    Newslinks
    NIETC
    Opinion
    Path Alternatives
    Path Failures
    Path Intimidation Attempts
    Pay To Play
    Potomac Edison Investigation
    Power Company Propaganda
    Psc Failure
    Rates
    Regulatory Capture
    Skelly Fail
    The Pjm Cartel
    Top Ten Clean Line Mistakes
    Transource
    Valley Link Transmission
    Washington
    West Virginia
    Wind Catcher
    Wisconsin

Copyright 2010 StopPATH WV, Inc.