A mysterious, new group advocating for "more ways to send Iowa's wind power out of state" appeared on TV screens all across Iowa on Monday.  The mysterious group claims it includes "wind power activists, vendors and industry leaders" and that is it "neutral" about the Rock Island Clean Line.  How could a group advocating for transmission lines in Iowa not be for RICL?
The true purpose of this group was revealed later on in the interview, however:
The Rock Island Clean Line is one for-profit company proposing to ship wind power produced in western Iowa to the outskirts of Chicago. None of that power would stay in Iowa and a number of landowners along the proposed 500-mile-long transmission line route have opposed the plan. Some owners and farmers have expressed concerns about potential damage to land from transmission tower construction and the threat of eminent domain to push a route if enough willing sellers aren’t found.

 But Lang, and Mike Prior, interim director of the Iowa Wind Energy Association, hope the new organization could serve as a “go-between” to bridge some of the disagreements between land owners and the Clean Line developers.
"Neutral," my eye!

A front group is an organization that purports to represent one agenda while in reality it serves some other party or interest whose sponsorship is hidden or rarely mentioned. [or denied!] The front group is perhaps the most easily recognized use of the third party propaganda technique.
So, what are Clean Line's ties to the new Windward Iowa group?

Windward Iowa's web domain was purchased October 21, 2013 by Larson Shannahan Slifka Group, aka LS2Group.
Larson Shannahan Slifka Group (LS2group) is a bipartisan public relations, public affairs, and marketing firm that guides its practices with one goal in mind: what others may do, we strive to do better. We offer clients an unparalleled commitment to excellence and take pride in our consistent delivery of successful outcomes. Our strength lies in the diversity of our team and its determination to apply creative solutions and unique perspectives to clients' needs. We see possibilities others cannot and have a track record of helping our clients reach their goals.
Right.  I'm sure other public relations companies cannot "see" the wheels coming off the front groups they set up for their clients at roll out.  But, that's neither here nor there. 

Who are LS2Group's clients?
"LS2group has a thorough understanding of our needs and responds quickly to our requests, coupled with a vast network of strong relationships with key officials."
- Cary K., Director of Development, Rock Island Clean Line
Who are LS2Group's employees?  I saw this one minding the Clean Line information table at the first Mendota public hearing.  Others have reported seeing her at other Illinois and Iowa public events.
This same LS2Group employee is also the named company contact on a recent press release about the Rock Island Clean Line project.

The claims that Windward Iowa is not advocating for Clean Line's RICL project, and has nothing to do with the company, are beyond credible belief.


Windward Iowa incorporated as a non-profit Iowa corporation on December 12, 2013.  According to its Articles of Incorporation, its purpose is:
to promote social welfare by seeking to educate and encourage landowners to become familiar with wind energy production and transmission, and expand the wind industry in the state of Iowa to further the common good and general welfare of the people of Iowa and the Midwest.
According to its Articles:
no substantial part of the activities of the corporation shall be the carrying on of propaganda, or otherwise attempting to influence legislation, and the corporation shall not participate in, or intervene in (including the publishing or publication of statements) any political campaign on behalf of or in opposition to any candidate for public office
and must abide by the laws for a 501(c)4 corporation as determined by the Internal Revenue Service.  This also means that donations to this corporation are not tax deductible.

Donations?  Yes, that's one of the ways you can "get involved" with this group, in addition to "submitting a letter to the editor or opinion editorial; commenting online through Facebook, Twitter or LinkedIn, or on an article; commenting to the Iowa Utility Board; or contacting your legislator or local government official."  Hey, wait a tick, doesn't that last one violate the Articles' prohibition on attempts to influence legislation?  That's some pretty thin ice!

I also wonder what the legal implications are of this corporation involving itself in negotiations with property owners that eventually result in eminent domain takings?

Windward Iowa's Facebook page contains numerous links to stories about RICL.

Windward Iowa's website makes sweeping statements that it does not back up, such as:

"Experts predict the U.S. will soon be in the midst of a transmission crisis. It is important to be proactive in addressing the issue and developing new infrastructure. We cannot afford to wait another 60 years for wind energy development.
The country’s electric grid is outdated and in need of attention and upgrades. Projects that bring wind energy through new avenues are part of the solution to providing clean, dependable, and renewable power."


Who are these "experts" and where have they made these statements?  Or did the public relations firm just make it up out of whole cloth?

Compare this information to the signs of a front group here:

1.  The group does not report who they are really working for, who their members are, or the source of their funding.  The idea that three individuals spontaneously decided to start an advocacy group managed by a pricey lawyer and a public relations group defies belief.

2.  There is no physical address or list of staff on the website.

3.    The group claims neutrality on some hot button issue and appears to be making general arguments about a topic only marginally related to the issue, and yet they mainly focus on a “secondary” issue (RICL).

This is all so classic.  I've had experience uncovering and reporting on transmission company front groups in the past, and my opinion is that Windward Iowa is a front group being paid for by Clean Line Energy Partners.

Because RICL and Clean Line Energy Partners are no longer viewed as an impartial and trustworthy source of information in Iowa, the company and its public relations contractor have created a supposedly "neutral" third-party entity that will continue to advocate for its project under another name.  If you wouldn't believe a word RICL says, then don't believe anything the company tells you when it is wearing its "Windward Iowa" mask.

Windward Iowa only has the same amount of credibility as RICL, and should be treated accordingly by opposition, elected officials, and the media.  It's very disappointing that none of the reporters attending the group's "launch" yesterday had the curiosity to ask where this group is getting its funding.  That's the literal "million dollar question."
 


Comments

02/25/2014 7:01pm

Why does their Facebook page have all the posts that Clean" Line's would...... if they still had it?
Guess it a good place to get "likes" with all the college kids "Windward Iowa" is trying to schmooz. Pretty funny that Block RICL's demographic almost never Facebooks and has more than 3400 likes, but RICL couldn't manage to scrounge up more than a few hundred likes after years of marketing to the prime FB demographic!

Reply
02/25/2014 9:15pm

Funny that their attorney's recommendation (Cary K.) was on LS2's social media page. They couldn't operate their own pages anymore without educated and informed comments being posted so now they need another cover to spread their propaganda?

Reply
Not Fooled
02/25/2014 8:36pm

I am not fooled by this company's dishonesty and duplicity. Why should the ICC or the IUB give such a dishonest company utility status and eminent domain rights over my property?

Clean Line Energy, you suck.

Reply
Kim
02/25/2014 9:20pm

I wonder how much they're paying that Lang guy........... I heard he was out of work.

Reply
Doctor Quack
02/25/2014 11:16pm

If it walks like a duck
If it quacks like a duck

It's probably another dishonest, dirty trick from RICL!!!!!!

Reply
Judge Judy
02/25/2014 11:24pm

Would someone please get that woman a shirt that fits her?

BANG BANG BANG

Reply
Integrity?
02/26/2014 10:07am

CLE — Transparent and forthcoming? What a load of bull. Will this front group censor its facebook comments as well? Clean Line lied about this practice before they shut their pages down. How do I know? 1. Posts by others were hidden. 2. Within a ten minute span: A Clean Line representative, after she checked with the maintainer of the pages, told me they didn't censor others' posts. Then when asked the same question, Director of Development Lawlor told me, paraphrasing: "Facebook isn't the best place to have open conversation/communication", as close to a forthcoming answer one should expect from Clean Line. Someone lied. Within a couple of days of my questions, their pages were down. Not honest. Not transparent. No integrity.

Reply
Born at night, not last night
02/26/2014 2:30pm

What is it these guys don't get about the word NO?
NO, some landowners will not sell you an easement.
NO, you can't convince them with more money.
NO, you can't convince them with fancier arguments.
NO, they will not willingly grant an easement.

RICL keeps operating under the premise that it will find some magic words to convince landowners to give up if they just keep at it enough. It's always about coming up with a better deal, making the landowners "understand" better, or paying their own neighbors to try to convince them to give up.

NO! It will never happen.
NO means NO!
Save your money, RICL, and quit wasting our time!

Reply



Leave a Reply