StopPATH WV
  • News
  • StopPATH WV Blog
  • FAQ
  • Events
  • Fundraisers
  • Make a Donation
  • Landowner Resources
  • About PATH
  • Get Involved
  • Commercials
  • Links
  • About Us
  • Contact

AEP's persuasive essay exercise receives grade of "F"

5/4/2011

5 Comments

 
Be careful when doing a little spring plowing in PATH's Internet back forty.  Mouldering corpses come popping out of the ground like a well-fertilized crop!  One such corpse I recently caught in my plow is this, which looks like AEP's attempt at a persuasive essay on why coal-by-wire is better than coal-by-rail.  AEP's wordsmith needs to go back to school because they obviously missed the unit on how to write a persuasive essay.  They must have been absent due to illness; perhaps it was a severe case of hemorrhoids because AEP's essay certainly gives me a pain in the ....

Ahem... AEP, you're getting an "F" on this assignment!  Not only am I not convinced that coal-by-wire is a great idea, I am sorely tempted to smack you upside the head with a ruler and make you sit in the corner wearing a dunce cap for the rest of the school year.

I'm not going to go through this thing line by line because I would be here all night.  I will pull out some of my favorites though, and demonstrate how AEP failed to
anticipate the readers’ objections and address them in their paper.  I strongly urge you to read the essay for yourself.  You'll enjoy it in much the same way those Fractured Fairy Tales were always the best part of Saturday morning cartoons when you were a kid.
.. because they were bizarre and funny!

The issue here is transmission grid expansion versus local siting of new generation to meet growing electricity demand.  AEP contends that grid expansion is the better option.

But, first, let's get this out of the way:

"On Jan. 31, 2006, American Electric Power became the first electric utility to employ the 2005 Energy Policy Act in attempting to have a major transmission expansion project deemed a National Interest Electric Transmission Corridor. AEP proposed a 550-mile 765-kV transmission line that would originate in AEP’s West Virginia service territory and travel toward the Atlantic Coast, offering opportunities for new generation and transmission expansion along the way. The project would increase transmission capacity by 5,000 MW in one of the most heavily congested regions of the United States. Some
opponents of the line – largely those who do not want to look at it in their own communities – have suggested that a more efficient solution would be to build new coal
generation plants in New Jersey and take the coal to those plants via existing rail infrastructure."


American Electric Power also became the first electric utility to have their project employing the 2005 Energy Policy Act FAIL.  Woo Hoo for first place, AEP!!!  And thank you for spending a whole bunch of time manufacturing this "issue" and inappropriately assigning it to fictional "NIMBYs" as part of your PR spin campaign.  And still, you failed at persuading anyone.

"While the transmission line – silently traversing the Pennsylvania landscape – is designed to blend into the background as much as possible and will be overhead and out of the way, it also will facilitate construction of additional generation sources, including renewables, all along its route."

"Silently traversing the landscape"? *SNAP* *CRACKLE* *POP*  Obviously you don't have one of these monsters in your backyard, do you AEP?  "[B]lend[ing] into the background"?  What background would that be?  The background set for the movie "Giant Erector Sets from Mars Invade Suburbia"?  "[O]verhead and out of the way"?  The same way a guillotine is "overhead and out of the way," I suppose?  And what happens if those renewables don't happen to spring up in close proximity to the route you have chosen for your coal-by-wire transmission line?  Is your transmission line portable so it can be moved closer to mythical future renewables?

"And rail shipment of coal from West Virginia to New Jersey to produce an equivalent amount of new
generation there would increase rail traffic by 115,000 coal cars annually along one of two routes, increasing traffic congestion, noise, pollution and safety hazards throughout the state."


Oh no!  Increased traffic congestion, noise, pollution and safety hazards!  And lions, and tigers and bears, oh my!  Let's see, your eventual concept consisted of the PATH project with a length of 275 miles.  It affected between 1500 - 2000 property owners who would be subject to eminent domain, noise and congestion from construction, continual noise and safety hazards from operation of your line and the pollution from the additional coal burned at your John Amos plant to create the electricity to be transported by the line.  Now, multiply that by two because your original concept was 550 miles long, nearly twice the length of PATH.

"Due to new concerns about the environmental impacts of coal, some would assert that it’s best not to transmit coal at all.  And new clean-coal technologies are leading us to a day when coal plants will be emission-free, or
nearly so.  And the coal of tomorrow is not the coal of yesterday.
"

There's no such thing as "clean coal!"  There's that word "nearly" again.  Power companies do so love that weasel word!  But what I really want to know is how the properties of coal, buried for eons, is going to change into "the coal of tomorrow" and come out of the ground in a pristine, toxin-free state in the future.

"In looking at the map above, I-765 would connect the Pennsylvania, Maryland and New Jersey red to the West Virginia blue, levelizing costs in the region..."

See, that's just the problem... the "levelizing" of costs make New Jersey's electric costs cheaper, but on the other side of the scale they make West Virginia's electric costs more expensive. 

"Based on PJM’s rate structure in which those consumers who benefit most from a project pay proportionally more than those who benefit less, much of the cost of the I-765 project likely would be borne by consumers in the eastern PJM area – including eastern Pennsylvania and New Jersey."

But that's not what happened, is it?  PJM applied postage-stamp rates that socialized the cost among ALL customers of PJM.  West Virginians got to pay for the privilege of having their electric rates "levelized."

"With a 2014 service date, the I-765 project will be transmitting electricity generated via much cleaner methods than those used today."

I don't know when this persuasive essay was written, but none of that cleaner electricity to be transported by the project ever materialized.

"...this transmission line is urgently needed to ensure the reliability of the nation’s power grid. AEP has stepped to the plate with its proposal..."

He swings, he misses.  He swings again, and misses.  He swings a third time... and YOU'RE OUT!

"Reliability concerns in one area can impact those in another, as evidenced in the blackout of Aug. 14, 2003, which took out more than 50 million consumers, in some places for many days. A lengthy investigation conducted by the U.S.-Canada Power System Outage Task Force determined that inadequate tree-trimming under transmission lines in northern Ohio was the cause of the outage, which might have rolled even farther across the
continent had it not been stopped by PJM and by AEP’s 765-kV transmission grid. "


AEP's version of the 2003 blackout.  Oh, thank you, mighty AEP!  You da man for stopping the blackout!  Can I feel your mighty 765-kV transmission grid?  Ooooh!  It's making me giddy!

"The Energy Policy Act of 2005 took a giant step toward alleviating congestion problems.  Transmission owners now can receive tax incentives for new transmission construction, and permitting processes have been streamlined. AEP’s project was the first proposed
under the new rules and will serve as a milestone for others."


Yup, there it is in the Power Company Playbook, heading up the chapter entitled, "What not to do."

See AEP's wind resources map on page 8.
"In the eastern U.S., wind energy could be productive along the Great Lakes and Atlantic shorelines, and atop the Smoky, Blue Ridge, Allegheny, Green and White Mountains.  These sites could offset the need for additional coal generation, but only if transmission
exists to move the electricity from the mountaintops to the consumers."


What happened to the wind energy along the Great Lakes and Atlantic shorelines?  All of a sudden AEP is moving energy from the mountain, like Moses showing up with the Ten Commandments.

"The presence of the line, which will spur upgrades of existing facilities owned by other companies, will create many opportunities for new generation – whether renewable such as wind, IGCC, or more traditional technologies – along the full length of the route."

Oh, fabulous!  Not only do we get a transmission line in our backyard, we will now also be a magnet for new power plants to spring up in our backyard!  Gee, AEP, you're such an outrageous flirt! ;-)

"They will be made of specially designed steel that is etched on the surface to encourage oxidation. In this process, tower steel starts out a dark, dull gray, eliminating sunlight reflection. The etching then causes
the towers to quickly develop a coat of rust, at which point they fade into the background for onlookers, especially in wooded areas."


Magical, disappearing transmission towers!  What will the geniuses at AEP think of next?  I hope they tie little flags on them so I don't accidentally run into these invisible towers on the lawn tractor while mowing.  That would probably hurt.

"A total of 1,150 100-car trains would be needed to transport coal from West Virginia to New Jersey. That’s 96 a month or just over three additional trains a day to equal the power transmitted overhead."

Wow!  Not three extra trains a day?!?  Say it's not so!  A $2.1 billion dollar transmission line that will take property from 2,000 families is so much less intrusive than 3 trains a day!

"The DOT reports, "coupled with expected increases in
auto and truck traffic, highway delay is likely to increase significantly at highway-rail grade crossings. The
delay to motorists and pedestrians could reach unacceptable levels in many communities, blocking
emergency vehicles, disrupting local commerce, inconveniencing residents and creating societal divisions."


Oh!  The horrors, the horrors!  Those three extra trains a day are going to be much too inconvenient, causing urban disaster!  It's preferable for thousands of people to be inconvenienced by your transmission line instead, of course!  We understand... we'll just stay on the proper side of the societal divide... with our EMF-toasted, three-eyed babies.

"Unlike the PJM transmission line projects in which the project benefactors pay the additional costs incurred, when added rail traffic increases wear and tear on crossings, taxpayers all share the bill."

Taxpayers or PJM ratepayers?  They're one and the same, you moron!  Which costs more?  A transmission line or three additional trains a day?  It's not who pays, but how much.

Oh look, the AEP wordsmith has anticipated my argument and countered  it with...

"While the addition of three trains a day through any given area would likely make an insignificant blip on numbers of this magnitude, the added stress on drivers in those areas as well as the lost productivity for employees who can’t get to work also must be considered."

...added stress for drivers?  Really?  I hope you never tempt fate by using a crosswalk in my route, buddy... I'll show you what driver stress is all about!

Gosh, AEP, we're so going to miss you now that PATH is dead!  Maybe you can start a railroad company subsidiary now, since your adventures in transmission line siting haven't quite worked out.  You could start by running three additional coal trains to New Jersey every day!


5 Comments
Da Hillbilly
5/4/2011 04:54:31 pm

HARHARHARHAR! Tell us how you REALLLLY feel. What a load of horse "s" they're trying with this one. Do they really think anyone believes the crap they spew out?

Reply
Da Hillbilly
5/4/2011 04:56:30 pm

BTW- how do I get me one of them "EMF Toasted three-eyed babies?" Do they get delivered by train or wire?

Reply
Keryn
5/4/2011 05:36:37 pm

Stork... but only if he can manage not to clothesline himself on the invisible power line on his way to your house.

Reply
ecift link
8/29/2013 08:14:14 pm

This site is very good site.Thanks for such a nice post. I found a lot of useful tips from this post.

Reply
Authentic Assignment Help Reviews link
2/2/2016 02:39:19 pm

This is such a helpful site for students. I like reading articles here.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    About the Author

    Keryn Newman blogs here at StopPATH WV about energy issues, transmission policy, misguided regulation, our greedy energy companies and their corporate spin.
    In 2008, AEP & Allegheny Energy's PATH joint venture used their transmission line routing etch-a-sketch to draw a 765kV line across the street from her house. Oooops! And the rest is history.

    About
    StopPATH Blog

    StopPATH Blog began as a forum for information and opinion about the PATH transmission project.  The PATH project was abandoned in 2012, however, this blog was not.

    StopPATH Blog continues to bring you energy policy news and opinion from a consumer's point of view.  If it's sometimes snarky and oftentimes irreverent, just remember that the truth isn't pretty.  People come here because they want the truth, instead of the usual dreadful lies this industry continues to tell itself.  If you keep reading, I'll keep writing.


    Need help opposing unneeded transmission?
    Email me


    Search This Site

    Got something to say?  Submit your own opinion for publication.

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010

    Categories

    All
    $$$$$$
    Aep Vs Firstenergy
    Arkansas
    Best Practices
    Best Practices
    Big Winds Big Lie
    Can Of Worms
    Carolinas
    Citizen Action
    Colorado
    Corporate Propaganda
    Emf
    Eminent Domain
    Events
    Ferc Action
    Ferc Transmission Noi
    Firstenergy Failure
    Illinois
    Iowa
    Kansas
    Land Agents
    Legislative Action
    Missouri
    Mtstorm Doubs Rebuild
    Mtstormdoubs Rebuild
    New Jersey
    Newslinks
    Opinion
    Path Alternatives
    Path Failures
    Path Intimidation Attempts
    Potomac Edison Investigation
    Power Company Propaganda
    Psc Failure
    Rates
    Regulatory Capture
    The Pjm Cartel
    Top Ten Clean Line Mistakes
    Transource
    Washington
    West Virginia
    Wisconsin

Copyright 2010 StopPATH WV, Inc.
✕