StopPATH WV
  • News
  • StopPATH WV Blog
  • FAQ
  • Events
  • Fundraisers
  • Make a Donation
  • Landowner Resources
  • About PATH
  • Get Involved
  • Commercials
  • Links
  • About Us
  • Contact

Misdelivered Mail From The Great Beyond

10/9/2021

0 Comments

 
The GBE propaganda from Invenergy is getting pretty thick on the ground.  One landowner received this mailer yesterday, along with a 60-day notice to sign an easement or else eminent domain may be used.
Picture
Does Invenergy really think this landowner is going to visit their little website to share why they support having their property taken by eminent domain in order to make way for a speculative transmission project that has no customers?  I continue to ask... what's the point of wasting millions of dollars on garbage mailers, radio & TV ads?  The whole thing is whack and can only work in the mind of Invenergy's PR hucksters.  Sort of like "Positive Energy."  Did the same team that was responsible for that PR disaster think up this one?  Looks like it to me.

Invenergy even has the wrong address for this landowner in its files and keeps trying to send notices to an address that hasn't been used for more than a decade.  Speaking of wrong addresses, a couple of responses to GBE's advertising binge that asks recipients to visit a website to share why they support GBE seem to have been delivered to the wrong place.  Perhaps their delivery got scrambled on the way from the great beyond?  I think I'll forward them to GBE via this blog, since GBE is one of my biggest fans.
Dear GBE, 

Here’s the thing… I don’t support you. I think you are an opportunistic thief without a moral compass. I would never treat people that way. Don’t compare yourself to me. I made millions smile, but you have made millions cry. Your hundreds of threats of eminent domain to take private property has turned Missouri into The Unhappiest Place on Earth.

Never yours,
Walt Disney
Rolling in my Grave

Hello Folks!

When it comes to disaster for Missouri, we've got a lot in common!  I may have turned a whole town into an environmental disaster, but you da man, turning an entire STATE into an environmental disaster! 

I support Grain Belt Express because of its potential for both environmental and financial disaster for Missouri.  We disasters gotta stick together!

At first, everyone thought I was harmless, but when I got sprayed all  over the place to control dust, it soon became apparent that I was a bad idea, much like you.

Times Beach would be a great place to build GBE.  The landowners there no longer mind.

Love,
Dioxin Contaminated Motor Oil
Former Superfund Site

Dear Grain Belt Express,

I was once quoted as saying, "Our job is only to hold up the mirror - to tell and show the public what has happened." 

When the mirror is held to GBE, I'm afraid it looks like a speculative energy project without enough customers that is having way too much fun playing with its new eminent domain toy unwisely gifted by a misguided, and perhaps biased, politically-poisoned institution.

Last time I checked you didn't have enough commercial interest to make your transmission project economically viable.  But yet you seem to be in a big, big hurry to take land for a project you can't build.  Is there something else going on here?

Please stop using my name in your insultingly facile advertising.  As the former "most trusted man in America", I do not support you.

And that's the way it is,
Walter Cronkite
Reporting from the Great Beyond

Rumble, tumble, Invenergy!  You shake things up more than I do, and not in a good way.  That's why I support the Grain Belt Express!

Sincerely yours,
New Madrid Earthquake
Soon to be Born Again if They Keep Pumping Things Deep Underground

To Whom It May Concern,

On the off chance that your misguided advertising campaign actually produces more than a handful of self-interested "supporters," I advise that whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect.  But I don't think you'll get much of a response from the Missouri people.  They know manure when they smell it.

I propose a grand deal... if you don't find any new supporters, then you abandon the Grain Belt Express.  What do you say?


In the first place God made idiots. This was for practice. Then he made public relations hacks.

The more I learn about people, the more I like my dog,
Samuel Clemens (my REAL name)


Sirs:

A competent leader can get efficient service from poor troops, while on the contrary an incapable leader can demoralize the best of troops.

You have demoralized the people of Missouri with your selfish, greedy scheme.

General John J. Pershing
No Longer At War In The Afterlife

Lovely, Contentious, Disastrous GBE,

We support you and look forward to adding you to our repertoire.

All the best,
Fire, Disease, Flood, Bad Weather and Pestilence, Inc.

Dear Invenergy,

Stop it!  You're making things tough on us.  We need the cropland you're taking out of production to stage our own disasters.

Not a fan,
Plague of Locusts

Hey Hucksters,

You don't really think people are going to go out of their way to support massive eminent domain takings across Missouri so that you can build a power line without any clear benefits for Missouri, do you?  Your "Way of the American Genius" campaign is a ship without a rudder.

What are you going to do with your manufactured support?  Push it under the noses of Missouri utilities and hope they see the light and sign up to become your customer?  Don't you know that utilities want to build and own infrastructure of their own because it's highly profitable?  Should Missouri close its own electric generators that employ thousands in good-paying jobs and replace them with energy imported from other places?

Or is this campaign just cover so you can make up "supporters" and then try to leverage your kingdom of make-believe for political purposes?

Failure looks good on you,
John Q. Public
Scanning a QR Code Because I Have Nothing Better To Do
0 Comments

PJM Suspends Transource Independence Energy Connection Project

10/7/2021

0 Comments

 
A couple weeks ago, PJM's Board of Managers very quietly suspended the Transource Independence Energy Connection Project "due to permitting risks."*

Between court, writing regulatory filings, and *gasp* a long-delayed vacation, I totally missed it.  From the look of things, though, so did everyone else.  So it's time to stand up and cheer, everyone!  You did it!!!

What does "suspend" mean?  It means that the project, which PJM calls "9A", has been removed from PJM's Regional Transmission Expansion Plan "pending further notice."  The project is not outright cancelled in its entirety... yet.  But, this means we're half-way there!!!
PJM says it will remove 9A from its upcoming RTEP and re-evaluate any reliability issues that remain.
Picture
And what reliability issues does PJM foresee in its unneeded project crystal ball?  These. 
Picture
But, pay attention to that last sentence in the very small font.  "Note: Violations are small in magnitude and operating steps for a short term duration can mitigate issues pending further review in 2022 RTEP."

Violations are small and not causing any problems currently.  You probably don't need a $500M sledgehammer to crack these nuts.

However, this whole thing bears watching.  I hate to tell you this, but when the same thing happened with the PATH Project, we had to wait 18 months for the re-evaluation and the actual cancellation of the project.  But I fully expect it is coming.

Now maybe Transource can quit wasting my money?
*This means YOU!  Good work!
0 Comments

Kleptomania

10/6/2021

0 Comments

 
Grain Belt Express has finally filed a condemnation case in Missouri.  It wants to
...condemn land and interests therein for any public use or purpose, and to acquire perpetual easements in, over, and across lands in which defendants have an interest, together with rights of ingress and egress to said lands.
Here's the gory details
The property interests and easement rights which Plaintiff seeks to condemn and are necessary for the Project include and are described as follows:
rights to develop, permit, construct, reconstruct, repair, improve, alter, replace,
operate, use, inspect, maintain and remove a transmission line, which transmission
line may include poles, towers and structures, such wires and cables as Grain Belt
shall from time to time suspend therefrom, foundations, footings, attachments,
anchors, ground connections, communications devices, and other equipment,
accessories, access roads and appurtenances, as Grain Belt may deem necessary or
desirable in connection therewith and to study or inspect in preparation therefor,
including survey, soil sampling, geotechnical evaluation, environmental tests,
archeological assessments, and transmission and interconnection studies. The
permanent rigbt-of-way may be used for the transmission of electrical energy and
for communication purposes, whether existing now or in the future in order to
facilitate the delivery of electrical energy. The easement rights include the nonexclusive
right of ingress and egress over the Easement Property itself in order to obtain access to the permanent right-of-way,
and over the Defendant's property adjacent to the Easement Property and lying
between public or private roads. Grain Belt shall, without being liable for damages,
have the right from time to time, including after the initial construction of the
transmission line, to clear the Easement Property of any improvements or other
structures to the extent that they interfere with Grain Belt's use of the Easement
Property as described herein, except fences (provided Grain Belt shall at all times
have access through any such fence by means of a gate); control, cut down, trim
and remove trees and underbrush from the Easement Property; and cut down and
trim any tree encroaching upon the Easement Property or the transmission line that
in the reasonable opinion of Grain Belt may interfere with the safety, proper
operation and/or maintenance of the transmission line.
What for?
...to construct and maintain a high voltage, direct current transmission line and associated facilities commonly referred to as the Grain Belt Express Project.
Yeah, well, I'm betting it has a more common name, but I don't use such language here.

But GBE says this won't be burdensome to the landowner

The use of the foregoing Property Interests, including any expansion of its facilities within the Easement Property by Plaintiff, upon condemnation thereof, does not impose an
unreasonable burden or impact on Defendants' property or Defendants' activities thereon, and
Defendants shall retain the right to use the Easement Property in any manner not inconsistent with the rights of Plaintiff described herein, including use of the Easement Property for agricultural or other similar purposes.
So, what happens next?  The Court
Appoint[s] three disinterested residents of Buchanan County, Missouri as the Commissioners to ascertain and assess the damages, if any, that the Defendants may sustain and the just compensation, if any, to which they may be entitled by reason of the appropriation of the Easement Property and
Property Interests;
Picture
It could get expensive.

But why now?  GBE says it needs to take this property NOW to construct a merchant transmission line that only has one known customer.  If GBE does not have enough customers to create a revenue stream adequate to pay its costs to build and operate, then the project will not be built.

Why would any court authorize a taking for a speculative project?  If GBE doesn't find enough customers, the line won't be built and it will have acquired property that is NEVER put into public use.  This may keep lawyers in Missouri busy for years to come...

Is this what the Missouri Public Service Commission envisioned?

What if you build it and they don't come?
0 Comments

Hubris is a Renewable Resource

10/6/2021

0 Comments

 
...a wise man once said.

I guess Invenergy is expanding its renewable resource portfolio then.  What else explains this:
Picture
Yes, right there in North Missouri the locals are going to erect a new Mt. Rushmore to their homegrown heroes.  Mark Twain, J.C. Penney, Walt Disney... and... Michael Polsky?  Don't hold your breath, Mikey, old boy.

First off, these three are from Missouri, born and bred.  Michael Polsky is not.  Invenergy isn't even a company based in Missouri.  Its headquarters are in Chicago.

What the heck, Invenergy... "our legacy"?  Invenergy has no legacy in Missouri, aside from the absolute misery it has put thousands of landowners through over the past decade trying to build a merchant transmission project that doesn't have enough customers to be viable.

Invenergy has no "legacy" as a genius, American or otherwise.  It's a company.  It's not human.  It has no brain of its own.  The real heroes that Invenergy used in its latest round of shameless propaganda were actual real people who did things to entertain or sustain people.  They didn't take private property from Missourians to fill their own pockets.

Does the crackpot PR team at Invenergy headquarters really think this kind of trash is going to impress "the locals"?  It's more likely to just... well... piss them off.

Besi menya.

Invenergy has been busier than a well-funded political candidate mailing out the oversized glossy card stock ads that fill everyone's mailbox in the run up to election day.  Ya know what happens to all that stuff?  Right in the trash can.  Nobody reads it.

But what if they did?  Would some random person who got one of these glossy ads in their mailbox really take the time to go to a website and tell them why they support something they know nothing about?  Not.  Happening.

Ya know... I'm going to take a guess here that the only people who sign up may be the dead and gone Mark (who had a real name that all Missourians know), J.C. and Walt.  In fact, it wouldn't surprise me if they signed up many, many times over the coming weeks and told Invenergy just why it is that they support the taking of private property for corporate profit.

Invenergy missed the boat though... Maya Angelou might have been a better choice of native Missourian.  They could have even quoted her...
I've learned that people will forget what you said, people will forget what you did, but people will never forget how you made them feel.
Invenergy makes Missourians feel pissed off.
0 Comments

Who's Ready For Another Round of Permit Whack-a-mole?

9/23/2021

1 Comment

 
Let's take a look at the Grain Belt Express shenanigans that have transpired while I was on blogging break...

Perhaps the most significant thing is the way Invenergy wormed its way into a crucial energy bill in Illinois.  Illinois was facing the closure of numerous baseload nuclear generators that were no longer financially efficient to operate, but could cause reliability issues if closed.  It's never just about the issue at hand when legislation is created  to fix a particular problem, though.  Instead, all the grifters showed up to cut themselves a huge piece of the energy $$$ pie, tagging their particular want onto a piece of legislation that was needed.  Before you knew it, Illinois had created a monster energy bill, with plenty of money to be had for all the players who could afford entry to the party.  And, of course, Invenergy used the legislation as a vehicle to favor Grain Belt Express in the state.

Remember all that blather about not changing the law to impede a project that was already under development?  Well, apparently that does not apply if the changed law BENEFITS a project already under development.  Missouri was prevented from changing its laws because Invenergy didn't like the change, but Illinois was encouraged to change its laws because Invenergy liked the change.  What's the change Invenergy inserted into the Illinois energy bill?  It granted Grain Belt Express eminent domain authority to take property in nine Illinois counties.  Not only that, it also requires that the Illinois Commerce Commission make certain findings "if demonstrated in the application" and "without the taking of additional evidence."  So, now the Illinois legislature is dictating the decisions a supposedly independent regulatory body will make?  And it is removing due process for other parties who may participate in the regulatory process?  Who knows if this is even legal... I'm sure it will end up in the courts at some point.  Seems like a stretch to me.

So, GBE got what it wanted in Illinois.  I'm sure it's busy scribbling its "demonstrated" application as I write this.  Does anyone know where I can get a kangaroo to bring to the public hearings?

Meanwhile, GBE has been busy trying to be liked in Kansas and Missouri by sprinkling a little money around.  I had a dream last night that sort of went something like this:

*Insert Wayne's World dream sequence music here*
                  *Diddly-doo, diddly-doo, diddly-doo*
Citified PR Person:  These local yokels think it's fun to gather at the end of the growing season and throw big festivals that they call "fairs" to display the things they have wasted their time growing over the past year.  They give out awards and everything!  Here's where we come in:  The locals auction their projects off for money at the end of the festival.  It appears that purchasing one of these food things garners great respect for the purchaser.  Our idea is to have GBE bid on these things!

Executive:  Why would we have to compete to own one of these animals?  Can't we simply take it from the local using eminent domain?  Besides, what do we want with farm animals?  I can't keep those kinds of animals at my home in Chicago.

Citified PR Person:  Well, sir, it appears that the locals send these animals to the butcher and then feed off their flesh over the winter.  Also, our eminent domain authority does not cover the taking of farm animals, however, if you want that changed I'm sure it can be done, but maybe not as cheaply as buying a cow.

Executive:  *screams*  That's barbaric!  I demand allegiance from state legislatures everywhere!  Besides, everyone knows that meat is manufactured at supermarkets, not created by killing things. And you must know that eating meat is causing climate change.  Everyone must stop eating meat in order to save the planet!

Citified PR Person:  I was prepared for that... so I also have another option.  Sometimes they auction off vegetarian options, such as pies.  But pies don't cost as much or earn as much respect for the purchaser.

Executive:  I like pie!  But you may also purchase animals for the express purpose of disposing of them in order to end their planet-warming flatulence.  Here's $10,000.  Now go forth and buy some goodwill.
Wow, I need to find a sleep aid that stops such crazy dreams!  But GBE did manage to purchase a stunning array of farm critters at fairs across the region, however that decision was actually made.  Maybe Polsky can potty train a few and make them into family pets?  I'm just wondering what purpose Invenergy sees in trying to be liked.  It's not like purchasing animals at fairs will change the mind of any landowner to voluntarily sell a transmission easement.  So, what's the purpose of trying to buy favoritism with everyone else?  Invenergy must have some scheme in the works, because it is also trying to manufacture likeability by sending out pointless propaganda in the mail.
Picture
Genius?  Sort of like Positive Energy?  I'm pretty sure the only people who care about GBE have already joined their neighbors... in opposition.  What's the point, Invenergy, what's the point?  What if you threw a party and nobody came?

GBE has also been busy making political contributions in Missouri.  What's next?  Special jackets for legislators with "Invenergy" embroidered on the lapel?  Hey, maybe they can hold a legislative barbecue to dispose of all those unwanted farm animals they purchased at the fair!  Whatever....

It's apparent that GBE still doesn't have enough customers to make its project economic, or it wouldn't be trying so hard.


Picture
How would a new application in Illinois change things?  It would bleed Invenergy of even more cash trying to get GBE approved, that's for sure.

What if Invenergy stopped throwing good money after bad and re-imagined its project into something everyone didn't hate?  What if it could build a transmission line that didn't require eminent domain, and contentious siting battles?  It could if it went back to the drawing board and routed its project underground on existing rights of way.  Other developers have been smart from the start, and feel confident that the additional costs to bury will be offset by avoiding legal and regulatory battles caused by opposition, as well as avoiding costly project delays.  That business plan is a win for everyone!  Do you suppose Invenergy (and before them Clean Line) has already spent MORE trying to build above-ground transmission on new rights of way using eminent domain than it would have spent designing a better project in the first place?  It's never too late to do the right thing.
1 Comment

Can Unicorn Farts Power Your Refrigerator?

9/23/2021

1 Comment

 
Just because I've been too busy to write doesn't mean I haven't been paying attention.  I have... and now that I've found the way out from under other projects, you get to hear all about it!  Lucky you!  (Hey, remember, reading this blog is voluntary.)

Do you want to sacrifice your reliable electric service in order to rely on power sources that have not yet been invented?  It looks like New York does.

The graph included in this article kind of took my breath away yesterday.  Here it is:
Picture
The power source at the number three slot doesn't even exist!  New York is going to provide 10% of the power it needs in 2040 using technology that does not currently exist!  "Dispatchable emmissions-free resources" is footnoted to point out that this resource is, "Not commercially available at this time, but will be critical to future grid reliability."  Is this a sensible, reliable plan?

Take note also that aside from nuclear, all of these resources are variable.  That is that they are not "dispatchable" at will.  They cannot always perform when called.  So, less than 10% of New York's future power could actually be reliably turned on when needed.

Another 7% or so of the resource is undefined "imports."  Imports of what, and from where?  If these are supposed to be imports of dispatchable resources from other states, what happens if those states also develop a plan similar to New York's that closes them down because they are  not "clean"?

New York seems pretty confident about its plan.  Maybe they plan to capture and enslave a herd of unicorns who will be forced to produce methane that can be converted into energy?  Sounds as plausible as other "not commercially available" sources these days.

Guard your unicorn!  The times, they are a'changing.
1 Comment

The Truth About Transmission in the Bipartisan Energy Bill

8/6/2021

2 Comments

 
Did this guy think everyone would cheer for his reasons to pass the Bipartisan Energy Bill?

Here's what's there when all the polish and generalities are are wiped off.
A long-running challenge in many parts of the US is that electricity generating capacity and energy demands grow faster than transmission systems. People and businesses want cheap, reliable electricity, but few embrace the necessary towers and wires—especially if they seem to deliver electricity and economic benefits mostly to far-off areas. There are often aesthetic, environmental, social justice, and business competition criticisms as well.

A 2005 energy law sought to address these tensions, granting the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) the ability to step in and sign off on projects that could alleviate transmission constraints in certain areas designated national electric transmission corridors. But so far, the Department of Energy has only designated two such areas, in the mid-Atlantic and in Southern California.
In addition, a federal court of appeals ultimately limited FERC’s authority, finding it only had the right to sign off on projects if states or other jurisdictions held up an application for more than a year. It did not have the ability to overrule state rejections of applications under the law, the court ruled.

So how will the Bipartisan Bill fix that?
A section of the infrastructure package expands the criteria that the department can use in selecting and designating transmission corridors. Among other changes, it could incorporate not just areas that are experiencing “capacity constraints and congestions” but those that are expected to, says Liza Reed, a research manager focused on transmission at the Niskanen Center, a think tank in Washington, DC.

In addition, the proposed rules now state that FERC would have the right to reverse state decisions for transmission lines in these high-priority corridors, not just act when states don’t. Making the process clearer and increasing the odds of approval should encourage more investors and developers to pursue such projects.

Shocking as that is, it's simply not enough for the environmental snob set (and the transmission builders who stroke their enormous egos).
But the infrastructure deal is still just a baby step toward the modern national grid we need.
Some have argued that legislators should grant FERC the authority not just to overrule states, but to run the whole approval process for lines that cross several states, similar to its powers over natural-gas pipelines today.

Because FERC's siting and permitting authority over buried gas lines has worked out so swell, hasn't it?  I mean, nobody is complaining about how FERC has handled that process, right?  Do these folks realize how very hypocritical they actually are?
And what about that transmission facilitation thing?
The bill also establishes a $2.5 billion revolving loan program for projects, which effectively makes the Department of Energy the initial customer for new transmission lines. This federal financing could help get time-consuming but necessary transmission projects under way before the developer has lined up customers. That could ease the perpetual chicken-and-egg problem between building more electricity generation and constructing the lines needed to transport it, observers say.

Eventually the federal government can sell those rights to clean electricity plants that need access to the lines as they come online.
It’s a promising policy tool that “just needs another zero in that budget line,” Jenkins says.

But what if the customers never show up?  What if these speculative transmission projects are built in the wrong places?  What if they never become operational?  How would they justify the taking of private property in order to build a bridge to nowhere using taxpayer funds?

Any transmission project that needs customers before being built is a merchant, or market-based,  transmission project.  It is only built if there is enough market need to financially support it.  Mandating that the federal government artificially skew the market only ensures unnecessary and unneeded transmission that nobody wants to use.  This has to be the absolutely dumbest idea in the whole stinking thing.

One last thing... this clown starts off with a totally incorrect premise.
Any effective plan to tackle climate change hinges on a basic technology: long wires strung across tall towers.
First of all, there's absolutely no proof that building transmission willy nilly will stop heat waves, cold snaps, wildfires, and droughts.  In fact, I can guarantee that those things will continue unabated.  Except now we'll be completely dependent upon transmission to ship our electricity from far, far away because we have no local sources of energy, and those transmission lines will be subject to failure from weather and wildfire.

Because buried transmission on existing rights of way is the future.  In fact, it's happening right now!!!  We no longer need long wires on tall towers.

When did our universities turn into cesspools of political idiocy?

If you haven't yet signed the petition or written to your senator, get busy! 
2 Comments

Sign Citizen Petition To Stop Big Government Overreach on Transmission

8/3/2021

1 Comment

 
Haven't had much time for blogging lately... big, BIG, BIG project coming up!

However, this is too important not to share.

!SIGN THIS PETITION!

Please sign to keep transmission siting and permitting in state hands.  Only your state officials can accurately judge the local effects of new transmission.  Just think about some suburban policy wonk making political decisions about land use in the Midwest.  It can only amount to bad news.

As well, we must stop unneeded merchant transmission from being supported with our tax dollars when it can't find customers.  We don't need anymore "clean" lines trying to use our tax dollars to fill their filthy rich investors' pockets.

Sign now!  Share with your friends!  We've got to put a stop to this out-of-control corporate welfare before a transmission line ends up in your back yard, or the back yard of someone you love.
1 Comment

SkellyFail 2.0 Begins

7/18/2021

1 Comment

 
Dear Michael Skelly:

The people you've been harassing with your failed transmission projects for well over a decade now still have their eye on you.  You pretty much can't get away with anything anymore.  It's not like last time where "the farmers" didn't know you existed and the threat you posed to their lives.  You know what they say... once bitten, twice shy...
Hubbs Land Management LLC to Michael Skelly, warranty deed, District 5, 5.126 acres, Hubbs Land Management property, lot 1, $525,000.
This is a recently published land sale for Loudon County, Tennessee.

Did Michael Skelly buy some lovely retirement property  southwest of Knoxville in east central Tennessee?

Nope.  It appears that he bought a backdrop for updated vanity photos that resemble this old pose.
Picture
That's right... it appears that Skelly has bought his very own vacant lot right next to an existing high voltage electric substation.
Picture
Who wouldn't want this backdrop for new "Our Team" pictures?
Picture
But wouldn't that also make a dandy spot for a new DC/AC converter station? 

It's not in Memphis this time... but about 400 miles further east.  However, it could follow the same path as the last one between Tennessee and Oklahoma.

What is Michael Skelly up to?  And why did he purchase this property in his own name, and not the name of his "early-stage transmission development company"?  Did he think nobody would find out?

Well, at least not before he "fixed" the reason that Plains and Eastern Clean Line ultimately failed.  It had no customers.  Nobody wanted to purchase any service on the "clean line."  However, the new "bipartisan energy bill" includes a provision that would require the Secretary of Energy to purchase transmission capacity for up to 40 years from new transmission projects that have no customers.  Read it for yourself.

Kind of reminds me of growing up in a small town, like Mayberry.  You can't get away with anything because someone is always watching.

Keep your eye on this.

1 Comment

Shenanigans and Malarkey

7/15/2021

2 Comments

 
Picture
Just like unsupervised children, our elected representatives get up to all sorts of hijinks when left unsupervised in Washington, D.C.  What have they been doing lately that you should care about?

A "bi-partisan" energy bill was reported out of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee yesterday.  This proposed legislation, hundreds of pages long, does two things that may affect you personally.

Ranking Senator John Barrasso took issue with these two provisions.  His statement is available here.  Bravo, Senator!

Title I, Section 1005, allows the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to site and permit an electric transmission project in the event that a State Utility Commission rejects or denies an application.  It usurps state authority to make the decision.  Just like the dreaded eminent domain authority, it demands that a state "voluntarily" approve the project, or else FERC will do it for them.

On this provision, Barrasso stated:
“To that end, the bill would empower the federal government to override states’ decisions on the siting of high voltage electric transmission lines. 
Last week, the president of the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, wrote to this committee saying: ‘this new provision simply gives the state an ultimatum: ‘Approve the project or FERC will approve it for you.'

At a minimum, a change of this significance should be the subject of its own hearing before this committee." 

Sen. Roger Marshall from Kansas proposed striking this offensive provision, but his amendment failed on a party line vote.

Also, Title I, Section 1007, requires that the Secretary of Energy to enter into capacity contracts for service on transmission lines.  It's not that the Secretary is going to use this capacity for delivery of energy, it's that the Secretary is going to pay for the capacity and then try to resell it to others.  The Secretary is going to use your money to financially support transmission projects that are so unnecessary that they cannot find any customers to use them. 
...the Secretary shall seek to enter into capacity contracts that will encourage other entities to enter into contracts for the transmission capacity of the eligible project.
Say what?  If an entity wanted to enter into a contract, it would do so.  It doesn't need "encouragement" from the Secretary of Energy to take a white elephant off its hands.  The legislation presumes everyone will step up to want a contract after the Secretary gets one.  Sorry, transmission capacity is not Tom Sawyer's fence.  What happens when no one is "encouraged?"  Well, looks like the Secretary is stuck holding the hot potato... for 40 years... paying for transmission capacity nobody uses.  Yes, it's as dumb as it sounds.

Senator Barrasso's take:
“This bill also gives the federal government the authority to buy electric transmission capacity. 

There is no shortage of private sector investment in transmission capacity. 

There is no reason to make the federal government a transmission buyer or seller. 

Au contraire, Senator.  There's 200 million reasons for this stupid, expensive and pointless provision.  One reason for every investor dollar Michael Skelly* wasted on his Clean Line projects that failed because he couldn't find any customers to buy capacity.  Skelly solves that problem by requiring the Secretary to buy his unneeded transmission capacity so that his unnecessary transmission projects can financially support themselves on the taxpayer dole.  It's pure subsidy for absolutely no reason at all.  A merchant transmission project, like Skelly wanted to build, is a market based project.  If there is market for a project, it will find customers, and the amount of its profits are set by the market.  Creating artificial market demand through captive, taxpayer-funded contracts does not create an actual market.  It only creates the proverbial "bridge to nowhere" while filling Skelly's pockets.

Sen. James Lankford from Oklahoma proposed striking this ridiculous provision from the legislation, but his amendment also failed on a party line vote.

If you like these provisions and their effect that could ram a transmission line down your throat and across your property, you need do nothing.  If, however, you object, get vocal.  Contact your Senators.  Contact Senators Barasso, Lankford and Marshall.  Contact NARUC.  Contact your state public utility commission.  Let them know these provisions are completely unacceptable, and why.  These people/organizations would probably agree with you.  Please let them know you are standing by to take further action and ask them how you can help.  This legislation must be defeated!
*And you won't believe what Michael Skelly is up to lately.  More on that later...
2 Comments
<<Previous
Forward>>

    About the Author

    Keryn Newman blogs here at StopPATH WV about energy issues, transmission policy, misguided regulation, our greedy energy companies and their corporate spin.
    In 2008, AEP & Allegheny Energy's PATH joint venture used their transmission line routing etch-a-sketch to draw a 765kV line across the street from her house. Oooops! And the rest is history.

    About
    StopPATH Blog

    StopPATH Blog began as a forum for information and opinion about the PATH transmission project.  The PATH project was abandoned in 2012, however, this blog was not.

    StopPATH Blog continues to bring you energy policy news and opinion from a consumer's point of view.  If it's sometimes snarky and oftentimes irreverent, just remember that the truth isn't pretty.  People come here because they want the truth, instead of the usual dreadful lies this industry continues to tell itself.  If you keep reading, I'll keep writing.


    Need help opposing unneeded transmission?
    Email me


    Search This Site

    Got something to say?  Submit your own opinion for publication.

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010

    Categories

    All
    $$$$$$
    2023 PJM Transmission
    Aep Vs Firstenergy
    Arkansas
    Best Practices
    Best Practices
    Big Winds Big Lie
    Can Of Worms
    Carolinas
    Citizen Action
    Colorado
    Corporate Propaganda
    Data Centers
    Democracy Failures
    DOE Failure
    Emf
    Eminent Domain
    Events
    Ferc Action
    FERC Incentives Part Deux
    Ferc Transmission Noi
    Firstenergy Failure
    Good Ideas
    Illinois
    Iowa
    Kansas
    Land Agents
    Legislative Action
    Marketing To Mayberry
    MARL
    Missouri
    Mtstorm Doubs Rebuild
    Mtstormdoubs Rebuild
    New Jersey
    New Mexico
    Newslinks
    NIETC
    Opinion
    Path Alternatives
    Path Failures
    Path Intimidation Attempts
    Pay To Play
    Potomac Edison Investigation
    Power Company Propaganda
    Psc Failure
    Rates
    Regulatory Capture
    Skelly Fail
    The Pjm Cartel
    Top Ten Clean Line Mistakes
    Transource
    Valley Link Transmission
    Washington
    West Virginia
    Wind Catcher
    Wisconsin

Copyright 2010 StopPATH WV, Inc.